ASRock Pg 1600G Atx 3.1 1600W Pcle5.1 Capacitor Japanese Fully Modular Phantom G vs CORSAIR CX650M
Updated August 2026 — The ASRock Pg 1600G is a high-performance power supply ideal for demanding systems, while the CORSAIR CX650M offers great value for mid-range builds.
The ASRock Pg 1600G is a high-performance power supply ideal for demanding systems, while the CORSAIR CX650M offers great value for mid-range builds.
Why ASRock Pg 1600G Atx 3.1 1600W Pcle5.1 Capacitor Japanese Fully Modular Phantom G is better
higher wattage
ASRock provides 1600W compared to Corsair's 650W
fully modular
ASRock features a fully modular design
longer warranty
ASRock offers a 10-year warranty versus Corsair's 5-year
Why CORSAIR CX650M is better
lower price
Corsair is priced at C$109.99 compared to ASRock's C$304.99
quiet operation
Corsair has a low-noise fan for quieter performance
easy compatibility
Corsair includes native cables for Nvidia RTX 50-series GPUs
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASRock Pg 1600G Atx 3.1 1600W Pcle5.1 Capacitor Japanese Fully Modular Phantom G | CORSAIR CX650M |
|---|---|---|
| Power Output | 1600W | 650W |
| Modular Design | Fully Modular | Semi-Modular |
| Efficiency Rating | 80 PLUS GOLD | 80 PLUS GOLD |
| Cooling Fan | 135mm FDB | 120mm Low-Noise |
| Warranty | 10 Years | 5 Years |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the ASRock Pg 1600G is significantly more expensive at C$304.99 compared to the CORSAIR CX650M, which is priced at C$109.99. This means that the ASRock power supply costs over two and a half times more than the Corsair model. The price difference may reflect the higher wattage and additional features of the ASRock unit, but for budget-conscious consumers, the CORSAIR option is much more accessible.
Power Output
Power output is a crucial factor in choosing a power supply, and here the ASRock Pg 1600G excels with a robust 1600W compared to the 650W provided by the CORSAIR CX650M. This substantial difference means that the ASRock model is better suited for high-performance systems or those with multiple graphics cards. If you’re looking to power a more demanding setup, the ASRock’s higher wattage can accommodate that need, while the Corsair’s output may be more than adequate for standard gaming rigs or mid-range builds.
Modular Design
The ASRock Pg 1600G features a fully modular cable design, allowing users to connect only the cables they need, which helps in maintaining a clean build and improving airflow. In contrast, the CORSAIR CX650M is semi-modular, meaning the main power cables are fixed while the remaining cables are modular. This design provides flexibility but not to the extent of the ASRock model. For users prioritizing a tidy build and optimal cable management, the ASRock offers a clear advantage.
Efficiency Ratings
Efficiency ratings are essential for understanding how much power is wasted as heat and how much is usable. The ASRock Pg 1600G boasts an 80 PLUS GOLD certification, indicating high efficiency, while the CORSAIR CX650M is certified under the same efficiency standard. Both power supplies are designed to deliver reliable performance, but the ASRock's additional certifications, including Cybenetics PLATINUM and LAMBDA A, suggest it may offer superior efficiency and reliability in demanding situations.
Cooling Features
Cooling capabilities are vital for maintaining system stability and longevity. The ASRock Pg 1600G employs a 135mm Striped Axial FDB fan with iCool Intelligent Fan Control Mode, which adapts to temperature changes for optimal cooling. Conversely, the CORSAIR CX650M is equipped with a 120mm low-noise fan that operates quietly under low and medium loads. While both fans are designed to mitigate noise, the ASRock appears to have the edge in terms of intelligent cooling features, which can be particularly beneficial during extended high-load periods.
Compatibility
Compatibility is a key consideration when selecting a power supply. The ASRock Pg 1600G is noted to be ATX3.1 and PCIe5.1 ready, ensuring it can support the latest components and technologies. However, it also comes with a warning that it may not be compatible with all built-in systems, which could limit its usability for some users. The CORSAIR CX650M also meets ATX 3.1 and PCIe 5.1 standards, and it includes native cables for easy connectivity to the newest Nvidia RTX 50-series GPUs. This makes the Corsair option more user-friendly for those upgrading from older systems, as it requires no additional adapters.
Warranty
Both power supplies come with significant warranties that reflect their manufacturers' confidence in their products. The ASRock Pg 1600G offers a global 10-year warranty, which is quite generous and suggests a commitment to quality and durability. In comparison, the warranty details for the CORSAIR CX650M are not specified in the provided data, but Corsair typically offers a standard 5-year warranty on their power supplies. The longer warranty of the ASRock could be a deciding factor for consumers concerned about long-term reliability.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASRock Pg 1600G and the CORSAIR CX650M will depend on your specific needs and budget. If you require a high-wattage power supply for a demanding system and value features like a fully modular design and superior cooling capabilities, the ASRock Pg 1600G is the clear choice, despite its higher price of C$304.99. On the other hand, if you are looking for a cost-effective, reliable power supply for a mid-range build, the CORSAIR CX650M offers excellent value at C$109.99, with adequate power and modern features suitable for most users.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

