ASRock Pg 1600G Atx 3.1 1600W Pcle5.1 Capacitor Japanese Fully Modular Phantom G vs CORSAIR CX750M
Updated August 2026 — The ASRock Pg 1600G is a superior choice for high-performance systems, while the CORSAIR CX750M offers great value for mid-range builds.
The ASRock Pg 1600G is a superior choice for high-performance systems, while the CORSAIR CX750M offers great value for mid-range builds.
Why ASRock Pg 1600G Atx 3.1 1600W Pcle5.1 Capacitor Japanese Fully Modular Phantom G is better
Power Output
ASRock offers 1600W compared to CORSAIR's 750W.
Modularity
ASRock features a fully modular design.
Cooling Technology
ASRock has advanced fan control features.
Why CORSAIR CX750M is better
Price
CORSAIR is significantly cheaper at C$124.99.
Noise Level
CORSAIR runs quieter under low loads.
Sufficient Power
CORSAIR is adequate for most mid-range systems.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASRock Pg 1600G Atx 3.1 1600W Pcle5.1 Capacitor Japanese Fully Modular Phantom G | CORSAIR CX750M |
|---|---|---|
| Power Output | 1600W | 750W |
| Certification | 80 PLUS GOLD | 80 PLUS BRONZE |
| Modularity | Fully Modular | Semi-Modular |
| Cooling Fan | 135mm TempGuard | 120mm Low-Noise |
| Warranty | 10 Years | 5 Years |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASRock Pg 1600G and CORSAIR CX750M
The ASRock Pg 1600G and the CORSAIR CX750M are both high-quality power supplies designed to meet modern computing needs. Priced at C$304.99, the ASRock Pg 1600G boasts a significant power output of 1600W, making it suitable for high-performance systems. In contrast, the CORSAIR CX750M, priced at a more budget-friendly C$124.99, offers a solid 750W output, which is sufficient for the majority of mid-range builds. This price difference highlights the varying target markets and application scenarios for each power supply.
Power Output and Efficiency
When it comes to power output, the ASRock Pg 1600G clearly takes the lead with its impressive 1600W capacity. This level of power is advantageous for users who may run multiple high-end components simultaneously, such as powerful GPUs and CPUs. The ASRock is also 80 PLUS GOLD Certified, indicating high energy efficiency, which is further reinforced by its Cybenetics PLATINUM and LAMBDA A certifications. On the other hand, the CORSAIR CX750M, delivering 750W, is suitable for most standard gaming and workstation configurations. Both units are ATX3.1 and PCIe5.1 ready, ensuring compatibility with the latest hardware, but for sheer power, the ASRock outshines the CORSAIR.
Design and Modularity
The design approach of each power supply reflects its intended use case. The ASRock Pg 1600G features a fully modular cable design, allowing users to connect only the cables they need for their specific builds. This can reduce cable clutter and improve airflow within the case. Additionally, the ASRock unit has a unique dual-color design and includes a TempGuard 135mm striped axial fan, which is engineered for operational efficiency and thermal management. In contrast, the CORSAIR CX750M employs a semi-modular design, where the main cables are permanently attached while the remaining cables can be added as needed. This design strikes a balance between convenience and flexibility but may not provide the same level of neatness as the fully modular ASRock.
Cooling Solutions
Effective cooling is critical for maintaining performance and longevity in power supplies. The ASRock Pg 1600G is equipped with a TempGuard 135mm striped axial fan, designed to operate quietly while efficiently dissipating heat. Furthermore, it features iCool Intelligent Fan Control Mode and a 5V BOOST mode, enhancing its ability to manage thermal conditions under various loads. The CORSAIR CX750M, on the other hand, is outfitted with a 120mm low-noise fan that is engineered to run cool and quiet, particularly under low to medium loads. While both units prioritise cooling, the ASRock’s advanced fan technology may offer superior thermal management in high-demand scenarios.
Build Quality and Reliability
Reliability is paramount when selecting a power supply, and both the ASRock Pg 1600G and CORSAIR CX750M are designed with quality components. The ASRock unit uses 100% highly reliable Japanese capacitors, known for their durability, which enhances the overall lifespan and performance stability of the power supply. In comparison, the CORSAIR CX750M's build quality is also commendable, but specific details regarding its internal components are not highlighted in the available information. The ASRock's emphasis on premium materials gives it an edge in terms of long-term reliability, especially for users with demanding power needs.
Price Considerations
The price difference between the two power supplies is significant, with the ASRock Pg 1600G retailing at C$304.99 and the CORSAIR CX750M priced at C$124.99. This disparity reflects the ASRock’s high power output and advanced features, making it more suitable for enthusiast-level builds or those requiring extensive power. Conversely, the CORSAIR CX750M presents an appealing option for budget-conscious consumers or those with standard computing needs, offering solid performance without the extra cost. Buyers should carefully consider their specific power requirements and budget constraints when choosing between these two options.
Compatibility
Compatibility with modern components is crucial for any power supply. The ASRock Pg 1600G is designed to be fully compatible with the latest standards, including ATX3.1 and PCIe5.1 specifications, which means it can support the newest graphics cards and motherboards seamlessly. The CORSAIR CX750M also meets these standards, ensuring it can comfortably power newer GPUs, including the Nvidia RTX 50-series and older 40-series cards, without the need for adapters. While both units offer excellent compatibility, the ASRock’s higher wattage makes it more versatile for high-performance setups that demand more power.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASRock Pg 1600G and the CORSAIR CX750M ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are building a high-performance system that requires extensive power and advanced cooling features, the ASRock Pg 1600G is the superior choice, despite its higher price tag of C$304.99. However, if you are looking for a reliable and budget-friendly option for a mid-range build, the CORSAIR CX750M, priced at C$124.99, provides excellent value without compromising on essential features. Assess your system’s power requirements and choose accordingly.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

