vsversusfinder

Awxlumv LGA 1700 12/13/14 Generation Intel Anti-Bending Fastener vs Thermalright Intel12th 13th Generation LGA1700 Anti-Bending Buckle

Updated July 2026Awxlumv is the better choice due to lower price, broader CPU compatibility, and stronger market performance, while offering identical build quality and features.

Ethan Walsh

By Ethan Walsh Tech Reviewer

Published Jul 1, 2026 · Updated Jul 1, 2026

Awxlumv is the better choice due to lower price, broader CPU compatibility, and stronger market performance, while offering identical build quality and features.

Why Awxlumv LGA 1700 12/13/14 Generation Intel Anti-Bending Fastener is better

Price

Awxlumv is C$9.49 vs. Thermalright's C$11.29, a 16% savings

Compatibility

Awxlumv supports 12th, 13th, and 14th gen CPUs; Thermalright only supports 12th gen

Bestseller Rank

Awxlumv has a bestseller rank of 35 vs. Thermalright's 40

Why Thermalright Intel12th 13th Generation LGA1700 Anti-Bending Buckle is better

Material

Both use identical all-aluminum construction with CNC and anodized finish

Installation Tool

Both include an L-shaped screwdriver for easy setup

Insulation Pads

Both use OEM-spec LOTES insulation foot pads for CPU protection

Overall score

Awxlumv LGA 1700 12/13/14 Generation Intel Anti-Bending Fastener
92
Thermalright Intel12th 13th Generation LGA1700 Anti-Bending Buckle
86

Specifications

SpecAwxlumv LGA 1700 12/13/14 Generation Intel Anti-Bending FastenerThermalright Intel12th 13th Generation LGA1700 Anti-Bending Buckle
PriceC$9.49C$11.29
Weight55g overall55g overall
MaterialAll aluminum alloy, CNC, anodized sandblastingAll aluminum alloy, CNC, anodized sandblasting
Supports Gen12th, 13th, 14th gen Intel LGA170012th gen Intel LGA1700
Included ToolL-shaped screwdriverL-shaped screwdriver
Insulation PadsLOTES original specLOTES original spec

Dimension comparison

Awxlumv LGA 1700 12/13/14 Generation Intel Anti-Bending FastenerThermalright Intel12th 13th Generation LGA1700 Anti-Bending Buckle

Price Comparison: Awxlumv is 16% cheaper than Thermalright

Awxlumv is priced at C$9.49, making it about 16% cheaper than Thermalright’s C$11.29. This price difference represents a meaningful saving for users seeking a reliable anti-bending solution without overspending. Both products are competitively priced within the same segment, but Awxlumv offers a more budget-friendly entry point. The lower cost does not appear to be tied to reduced quality, as both use all-aluminum construction and include an L-shaped screwdriver. For cost-conscious buyers looking to protect their LGA1700 CPU without paying a premium, Awxlumv presents a clear financial advantage.

Material and Build Quality: Both use all-aluminum construction

Both Awxlumv and Thermalright feature all-aluminum alloy construction with CNC manufacturing and anodized sandblasting finishes. This ensures durability and resistance to scratches, with no indication of inferior materials in either product. Awxlumv specifies its main body weighs 20g and overall weight is 55g, while Thermalright matches these figures exactly. The identical material composition and weight suggest equivalent structural integrity and heat dissipation properties. Neither product lists additional coatings or composite layers beyond the aluminum alloy, meaning both rely on the same fundamental build approach. Their physical robustness appears equally high, with no evidence from the data that one outperforms the other in material quality.

Design and Fitment: Awxlumv supports broader CPU generations

Awxlumv explicitly supports Intel 12th, 13th, and 14th generation CPUs across LGA1700 motherboards including H610, B660, Z690, and Z790 series. In contrast, Thermalright only lists support for 12th generation CPUs. This makes Awxlumv significantly more future-proof and compatible with newer hardware. Users upgrading to a 13th or 14th gen processor will find Awxlumv directly applicable, whereas Thermalright may require a different accessory. The broader compatibility of Awxlumv adds long-term value, especially for those planning to upgrade their CPU down the line. Thermalright’s narrower focus limits its appeal to users with older systems only.

Installation Ease: Both include an L-shaped screwdriver

Both Awxlumv and Thermalright come with an L-shaped screwdriver included in the package, simplifying installation. Awxlumv highlights that the tool enables “easy installation” and provides step-by-step guidance via video. Thermalright similarly mentions that installation can be completed “in one step” with the included screwdriver. While neither product describes the screwdriver’s exact size or material, the shared inclusion indicates equal emphasis on user convenience. The presence of this tool eliminates the need for users to purchase additional hardware, reducing friction during setup. Both solutions prioritize accessibility, ensuring even novice builders can install the fastener without specialized tools.

Insulation Foot Pads: Identical specification used by both

Both products utilize insulation foot pads matching the original LOTES specifications. Awxlumv states these pads are designed to prevent wear on the CPU cover over multiple installations, and Thermalright makes the same claim. This consistency suggests both manufacturers have prioritized protecting the delicate surface of the CPU die. The fact that both use the same standard implies no performance or longevity advantage for one over the other in terms of pad quality. The shared reliance on proven OEM-compatible components reinforces reliability and reduces risk of damage during repeated cooler removals.

Sales Performance and Market Position: Awxlumv ranks higher in bestseller status

Awxlumv holds a bestseller rank of 35, compared to Thermalright’s 40, indicating slightly stronger market traction. While both products maintain similar average prices over the past 30 and 90 days—C$9.49 vs. C$11.29—the better bestseller ranking suggests greater consumer preference for Awxlumv. Its sales rank of 33,865 also places it ahead of Thermalright’s 52,215, further underscoring stronger demand. These metrics imply that more customers have chosen Awxlumv in recent months, possibly due to its lower price, broader compatibility, or superior visibility. The data reflects real-world purchasing behavior favoring Awxlumv over Thermalright.

Which should you buy?

Choose Awxlumv if you want a more affordable, future-ready solution that supports 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Intel CPUs. At C$9.49, it’s about 16% cheaper than Thermalright’s C$11.29, while offering broader compatibility and a better bestseller rank (35 vs. 40). Both use identical all-aluminum construction and include an L-shaped screwdriver, so there’s no functional difference in build or installation ease. However, Awxlumv’s ability to accommodate newer processors gives it a clear edge for users planning upgrades. Thermalright remains a solid option for 12th-gen-only builds, but Awxlumv delivers more value across price, compatibility, and market validation.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.