Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive Running & Walking Shoe - Grey/Blacke vs ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes
Updated August 2026 — The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 offers better value for budget-conscious shoppers, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels in advanced support and cushioning technologies.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 offers better value for budget-conscious shoppers, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels in advanced support and cushioning technologies.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive Running & Walking Shoe - Grey/Blacke is better
price
Brooks is C$14.95 cheaper than ASICS
cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning
support system
Brooks has GuideRails holistic support system
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes is better
breathability
ASICS has engineered mesh upper reducing overlays
dynamic response
ASICS features 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for stability
softness
ASICS rearfoot PureGEL technology is softer
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive Running & Walking Shoe - Grey/Blacke | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | ASICS |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Cushioning Tech | DNA LOFT v3 | PureGEL |
| Support Tech | GuideRails | 4D GUIDANCE |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is more affordable at C$175.00 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32, which retails for C$189.95. This makes the Brooks model a better option for budget-conscious shoppers looking for a high-quality running shoe. The price difference of C$14.95 could be significant for some, especially when considering multiple purchases or budget constraints.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, both shoes offer unique aesthetics that cater to different preferences. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features a classic grey and black colour scheme, appealing to those who prefer a more traditional look. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 boasts an engineered mesh upper that not only enhances breathability but also adds a modern touch to its overall appearance. While both shoes are stylish, your choice may depend on whether you favour a classic or contemporary design.
Comfort and Fit
Both shoes prioritise comfort, but they achieve it through different technologies. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 utilizes premium nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, designed to provide lightweight softness. This shoe also features a breathable engineered mesh upper and a flat-knit collar for a secure fit, accommodating natural movement. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 incorporates a 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION feature that helps cater to individual gait differences, improving compression at footstrike. This shoe also includes a knit heel pull tab for added convenience. Depending on your specific comfort needs, either shoe could be a good fit.
Support Features
When it comes to support, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 excels with its innovative GuideRails holistic support system. This technology promotes natural motion while keeping excess movement in check, making it a suitable choice for runners who need extra stability. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 features a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that responds dynamically under load, providing stability throughout your run. Each shoe offers valuable support features, but the choice may hinge on whether you prefer a more structured support system or a dynamic response to your running style.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning is a crucial factor in running shoes, and both models offer unique solutions. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 boasts soft and dynamic nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, designed for comfort over long distances. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 features a rearfoot PureGEL technology that is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology. This difference in cushioning could affect your running experience, especially if you have specific preferences for softness or responsiveness underfoot.
Breathability
Breathability is essential for keeping feet comfortable during long runs. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 includes a breathable engineered mesh upper, which allows for airflow and helps regulate temperature. Similarly, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 also features an engineered mesh upper designed to reduce the need for additional overlays, enhancing its breathability. Both shoes perform well in this category, but if you’re particularly concerned about heat and moisture, either option could serve your needs effectively.
Weight and Agility
Weight can significantly impact your running experience, especially for those who prefer a lighter shoe. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is designed to offer a lightweight feel while providing robust support and cushioning. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32, while also lightweight, places a strong emphasis on stability and cushioning, which may add slightly to its overall weight. Runners who favour agility may lean towards the Brooks model, while those prioritising stability might appreciate the ASICS offering.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If budget is a primary concern, the Brooks shoe offers high-quality features at a lower price of C$175.00. However, if you are looking for advanced support technologies and superior cushioning, the ASICS model, priced at C$189.95, may be worth the investment. Both shoes are excellent choices for running and walking, but your decision should reflect your priorities in comfort, support, and budget.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

