vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - vs ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes

Updated August 2026The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 offers superior comfort and stability, while the ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 28 provides a lightweight and energetic ride. Choose based on your specific needs.

The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 offers superior comfort and stability, while the ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 28 provides a lightweight and energetic ride. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - is better

Cushioning

Brooks has a higher stack of cushioning.

Stability

Brooks offers a wider base for better support.

Certification

Brooks is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes is better

Price

ASICS is more affordable.

Weight

ASICS is marketed as a lightweight trainer.

Energy Return

ASICS features responsive FF BLAST MAX cushioning.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony -
85
ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes
78

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes
BrandBrooksASICS
Current PriceC$237.97C$179.90
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshEngineered Mesh
Cushioning TechDNA Loft 3FF BLAST MAX
WeightHeavierLighter

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes

Overview of the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3

The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 is designed for both running and walking, featuring a price point of C$237.97. This shoe prioritizes comfort and support, making it a great choice for those who may require additional cushioning during their activities. Its high stack of DNA Loft 3 cushioning is engineered to reduce pressure underfoot, ensuring that users experience less fatigue during prolonged use.

The shoe's GlideRoll Rocker technology aids in smooth heel-to-toe transitions, enhancing natural foot movement. Furthermore, it is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and holds the APMA Seal of Acceptance, adding to its credibility as a supportive footwear choice. The breathable upper, made from high-fidelity textile and engineered mesh, provides a well-ventilated fit that is comfortable for all-day wear.

Overview of the ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 28

The ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 28 is priced at C$179.90 and is marketed as a lightweight trainer that promises a smooth underfoot feel during runs. The shoe incorporates FF BLAST MAX cushioning technology, providing a combination of cloud-like softness and energy return, vital for an efficient running experience. The PureGEL technology further enhances cushioning, making it approximately 65% softer compared to standard GEL technology.

The shoe's engineered mesh upper is designed to be lightweight and breathable, reducing the need for additional overlays that could weigh the shoe down. The FLUIDRIDE outsole blends EVA and rubber to offer both comfort and durability, ensuring that runners can maintain traction on various surfaces without compromising the shoe's lifespan.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort and cushioning, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 stands out with its high stack of nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning. This feature significantly reduces underfoot pressure, allowing for a more comfortable stride. The shoe is particularly beneficial for those who may be prone to injuries, as it helps with energy absorption during movement.

Conversely, the ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 28 utilises FF BLAST MAX cushioning, which also prioritizes comfort but focuses on providing a responsive energy return with each step. The addition of PureGEL technology makes the shoe softer and more adaptable to different foot shapes. While both shoes excel in cushioning, the Brooks shoe may offer a slightly more protective feel due to its high stack height.

Breathability and Fit

When it comes to breathability, both shoes feature engineered mesh uppers designed for proper ventilation. The Brooks shoe’s upper is made from a high-fidelity textile paired with engineered mesh, focusing on comfort and breathability for extended wear. This combination allows for a snug fit while also facilitating airflow.

The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 also prioritizes breathability with its lightweight mesh upper, which minimizes overlays that could hinder airflow. This design helps keep feet cool, particularly during warmer weather. While both options are breathable, the Brooks shoe may provide a bit more comfort over long periods due to its emphasis on soft materials.

Stability and Support

Stability and support are crucial factors for runners, and the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 excels in this area with its wide base design. This design enhances stability and provides a secure feel for users, accommodating a variety of foot shapes and orthotics. The raised sidewalls further contribute to the shoe’s supportive structure, making it suitable for those who need extra stability while engaging in physical activities.

On the other hand, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 employs its FLUIDRIDE outsole and AHAR LO rubber heel plug for support and traction. While it does offer stability, it primarily focuses on delivering a responsive ride rather than the heightened stability found in the Brooks shoe. Therefore, individuals seeking maximum support may find the Brooks option more appealing.

Durability

Both shoes are crafted with durability in mind, but they use different technologies to achieve this. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 features a combination of high-quality materials that ensure longevity, particularly with its carbon-neutral certification, which reflects a commitment to sustainable practices.

The ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 28 is also designed for durability, thanks to the AHAR LO rubber strategically placed in high-wear areas of the outsole. This material provides reliable grip and traction, which is essential for runners who frequent varied terrains. Overall, both products showcase durability, but the Brooks shoe leans towards a more robust construction.

Aesthetic Appeal

In terms of aesthetic appeal, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 comes in a sleek black design, catering to those who prefer a classic look that pairs well with various athletic outfits. Its understated elegance allows it to transition easily from running to casual wear.

The ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 28 presents a more vibrant option with its SUNNY SIZZLE collection, inspired by the colours of sunrise and sunset. The unique gradient spray on the upper and midsole adds an eye-catching element, making it a good choice for those who enjoy a pop of colour in their running gear. Ultimately, the choice between the two may depend on personal style preferences.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 and the ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 28 ultimately hinges on your specific needs as a runner or walker. If you prioritise maximum comfort, support, and stability, the Brooks shoe, priced at C$237.97, may be the better option, especially for those who require additional cushioning and a wider base. However, if you seek a lightweight shoe with energetic cushioning and a more affordable price point of C$179.90, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 is an excellent choice that balances comfort and durability.

In conclusion, both shoes offer unique benefits, and your personal preferences regarding fit, style, and intended use will guide your final decision.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - vs ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes | versusfinder