Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - vs ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 is priced at C$237.97, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is significantly more affordable at C$99.95. This represents a price difference of C$138.02, making the ASICS option more budget-friendly for those looking for a reliable running shoe without a hefty investment. The Brooks shoe, while more expensive, offers a high stack of DNA Loft 3 cushioning and a certified carbon-neutral design, appealing to runners and walkers seeking superior comfort and support.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 boasts a high stack of nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which is designed to reduce underfoot pressure and enhance natural movement. This specific cushioning aims to lower the risk of injury while promoting an effortless stride. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 utilises AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, providing a softer ride and combined with Rearfoot GEL technology for shock absorption. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Brooks model's advanced cushioning technology is tailored for those prioritising a plush feel during longer runs or walks.

Breathability and Upper Design

The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 features a breathable upper constructed from high-fidelity textile and engineered mesh, which enhances airflow, ensuring a comfortable fit for all-day wear. This design is particularly beneficial for users who experience overheating during physical activities. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 incorporates an engineered jacquard mesh upper that promotes airflow and provides a softer feel against the foot. Both shoes offer breathability, but the Brooks model may provide a marginally better fit through its unique textile combination, catering to those needing extended comfort during prolonged use.

Stability and Support

Stability is a key factor for runners, and the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 excels in this regard with its wide base and raised sidewalls, which enhance bending stiffness and provide a snug, supportive fit. This design aims to accommodate various foot shapes and orthotics, ensuring comfort and support during movement. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11, while also supportive, does not emphasize stability to the same extent and focuses more on cushioning and shock absorption. Those requiring additional stability for their runs may find the Brooks model a better fit for their needs.

Transition and Performance

The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 features a GlideRoll Rocker that actively supports smooth heel-to-toe transitions, making each step feel effortless. This design is particularly advantageous for runners looking to enhance their stride efficiency. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 also includes cushioning technologies aimed at providing a responsive ride, but it does not specifically mention a rocker design. As a result, the Brooks shoe may be better suited for those prioritising performance in their running form, while the ASICS model may appeal to casual runners focused on comfort.

Versatility for Activities

The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 is marketed as suitable for both running and walking, making it a versatile choice for various activities. Its features cater to users who engage in different types of physical exercise, enhancing its practicality. In comparison, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is primarily designed as a running shoe, although it may still serve well for casual walking. However, the Brooks model’s dual-purpose capabilities position it as a more versatile option for those who wish to engage in multiple activities without needing to switch shoes.

Brand Reputation and Certification

Brooks is recognised for producing high-quality running shoes and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance for the Ghost Max 3, certifying its suitability for individuals with specific foot health concerns. Additionally, it is a certified carbon-neutral product, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers. The ASICS brand is also reputable, known for its innovative technologies in cushioning and support. However, it lacks the specific certifications that the Brooks model boasts, which may influence the decision for consumers prioritising health and environmental factors.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 largely depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are seeking advanced cushioning, stability, and the versatility to engage in both running and walking, the Brooks model is a strong contender, albeit at a higher price of C$237.97. Conversely, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers comfort and decent performance for running, the ASICS model at C$99.95 is an attractive choice. Ultimately, your decision should reflect your priorities, whether they lie in advanced technology and support or in affordability and casual use.