Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 offers superior cushioning and stability, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 is a more budget-friendly option with good comfort.
The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 offers superior cushioning and stability, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 is a more budget-friendly option with good comfort.
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - is better
cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
stability
Brooks has a wide base and raised sidewalls for support.
medical certification
Brooks is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 Running Shoe is better
price
New Balance is C$181.96, cheaper than Brooks.
lightweight
New Balance has a sleek design with no-sew overlays.
bio-based content
New Balance uses approximately 3% bio-based content in its foam.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 Neutral Running & Walking Shoe - Black/Black/Ebony - | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Upper Material | Textile/Mesh | Synthetic/Textile |
| Midsole | DNA Loft v3 | Fresh Foam X |
| Outsole | Rubber | Rubber Pods |
| Weight | Light | Light |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 is the more economical option at C$181.96, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 costs C$237.97. This means that the Brooks shoe is approximately 31% more expensive than the New Balance model. For budget-conscious buyers, the cost difference is significant, especially if the shoes will be used for daily wear rather than competitive running. However, the higher price of the Brooks shoe may be justified by its additional features and performance benefits, which we will explore further.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both shoes excel in comfort, but the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 offers a higher level of cushioning with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 technology. This feature not only reduces underfoot pressure but also promotes natural movement, making it ideal for long runs or walks. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 also boasts impressive cushioning with its Fresh Foam X midsole, providing a soft and comfortable experience. While both shoes prioritise comfort, the Brooks model’s advanced cushioning technology may appeal more to those prioritising long-term wear during extended activities.
Fit and Upper Design
The fit and upper design of both models cater to different preferences. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 features a breathable upper made of high-fidelity textile combined with engineered mesh, offering a comfortable and well-ventilated fit. In contrast, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 includes no-sew overlays for a sleek fit, along with an engineered mesh, synthetic, and textile upper. While both designs aim for a secure fit, the Brooks shoe provides enhanced breathability, which can be crucial for those who sweat more during their activities.
Stability and Support
Stability is a key factor for both shoes, but they approach it differently. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 incorporates a wide base and raised sidewalls, creating a stable ride that supports natural stride and accommodates various foot shapes. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require additional support. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 focuses on a sleek, streamlined design that may offer less inherent stability compared to the Brooks model. For users prioritising stability, the Brooks shoe may be the more suitable choice.
Versatility for Activities
In terms of versatility, both shoes are designed for running and walking, but the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 stands out as a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, which may appeal to a wider audience, including those with specific foot care needs. This certification, along with its APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicates a design that prioritises foot health. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 is marketed as suitable for daily wear and training, but it lacks the specific medical endorsements that the Brooks shoe has. For users needing versatile footwear that caters to health considerations, the Brooks option is a clear winner.
Durability and Build Quality
Durability is essential for any running shoe, particularly for those who log significant mileage. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 is constructed with a focus on long-lasting performance, featuring a high stack of cushioning that not only absorbs impact but also prolongs the shoe's lifespan. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 includes rubber outsole pods designed to withstand daily wear and tear, enhancing durability for regular activities. While both shoes are built for durability, the Brooks model may provide a more resilient option for serious runners looking to maximise the life of their footwear.
Brand Reputation
Both Brooks and New Balance have established reputations in the running shoe market. Brooks is particularly known for its high-quality running shoes that focus on comfort, support, and injury prevention. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 aligns with these values, offering features that cater to serious runners and walkers. New Balance, on the other hand, is celebrated for its innovative cushioning technologies and stylish designs. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 showcases the brand's commitment to comfort and performance. Ultimately, your brand preference may influence your decision, but both brands are reputable choices.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 3 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X Kaiha Road V1 largely depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritise enhanced cushioning, stability, and medical certification, the Brooks model may be worth the higher investment of C$237.97. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers good comfort and versatility for daily activities, the New Balance model at C$181.96 is a solid choice. Ultimately, both shoes have their unique strengths, catering to different preferences and requirements for running and walking enthusiasts.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

