Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 Supportive Running Shoe - Spellbound/Yucca/Pink - vs Reebok Energen Run 4 Running Shoes for Women
Updated August 2026 — The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 excels in cushioning and stability for serious runners, while the Reebok Energen Run 4 offers versatility and affordability for casual use.
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 excels in cushioning and stability for serious runners, while the Reebok Energen Run 4 offers versatility and affordability for casual use.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 Supportive Running Shoe - Spellbound/Yucca/Pink - is better
price
C$209.95 vs C$85.99
cushioning
Zonal nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning
support
GuideRails technology for stability
Why Reebok Energen Run 4 Running Shoes for Women is better
versatility
Suitable for running, walking, and gym workouts
weight
Lightweight design for casual wear
style
Timeless styling for everyday use
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 Supportive Running Shoe - Spellbound/Yucca/Pink - | Reebok Energen Run 4 Running Shoes for Women |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Reebok |
| Model | Glycerin GTS 23 | Energen Run 4 |
| Upper Material | Triple jacquard knit | Engineered mesh |
| Midsole | DNA TUNED | FuelFoam Plus |
| Offset | 8mm | N/A |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 is significantly more expensive at C$209.95 compared to the Reebok Energen Run 4, which retails for C$85.99. This difference of C$123.96 may be a critical factor for budget-conscious buyers. While the Glycerin GTS 23 promises advanced features tailored for serious runners, the Energen Run 4 offers a more accessible price point, making it an attractive option for casual joggers or those seeking a versatile shoe for various activities.
Target Audience
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 is specifically designed for runners who require soft cushioning and stability, particularly those who overpronate. Its features cater to individuals looking for guidance during daily runs, long distances, or recovery days. In contrast, the Reebok Energen Run 4 targets a broader audience, including runners, walkers, and gym-goers. This versatility is evident in its design, which is suitable for both casual joggers and marathon runners, appealing to a wider demographic.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a standout feature of both shoes, but they take different approaches. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 utilizes zonal nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning, providing plush comfort that softens landings and energizes toe-offs. This shoe also incorporates an 8mm offset for a smooth transition from heel to toe. The Reebok Energen Run 4, on the other hand, highlights its FuelFoam Plus midsole designed for springy cushioned responsiveness, offering a lightweight experience. While both shoes provide comfort, the Glycerin GTS 23 is likely to appeal more to those prioritizing cushioning and stability on longer runs.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 presents a more performance-oriented aesthetic, featuring a triple jacquard warp-knit upper that balances breathability and structure. Its colourway, Spellbound/Yucca/Pink, adds a touch of flair suitable for serious runners. The Reebok Energen Run 4, however, embraces a timeless styling approach, available in versatile colours like all black and white. This design makes it suitable not just for running but also for casual wear and workouts, appealing to those who value style alongside function.
Durability
Durability is an essential consideration for any running shoe, especially for those who engage in regular training. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 is crafted with a focus on stability and support, which generally contributes to its longevity on the road. Its high-stack midsole is engineered to withstand the rigours of daily running. The Reebok Energen Run 4 also promises durability, featuring a rubber sole designed for solid traction and stability. It is constructed to endure heavy wear, making it a reliable choice for those who need a dependable shoe for various activities.
Performance Features
The performance features of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 are particularly noteworthy. Its GuideRails technology stabilizes the foot and aligns the knee, making it ideal for runners needing mild-to-moderate support. This feature allows for a more guided stride without hindering natural movement. Meanwhile, the Reebok Energen Run 4 focuses on lightweight performance with an engineered mesh upper for breathability, making it suitable for various activities. While both shoes have features that enhance performance, the Glycerin GTS 23 is tailored for serious runners seeking structured support.
Versatility
Versatility is a key strength of the Reebok Energen Run 4, as it functions well across different activities, from running to gym workouts. Its lightweight design and stylish appearance make it an easy choice for everyday wear. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23, while excellent for running, is more specialized and may be less appealing for casual use. Runners seeking a shoe that can transition seamlessly from the pavement to the gym may find the Energen Run 4 to be a better fit for their lifestyle.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 and the Reebok Energen Run 4 ultimately depends on your needs and budget. If you are a serious runner looking for advanced cushioning and stability, the Glycerin GTS 23 is worth the investment at C$209.95. However, if you prioritize versatility and affordability, the Energen Run 4 at C$85.99 offers an excellent balance of comfort and performance for various activities. Consider your running habits, style preferences, and budget to make the best choice for your footwear needs.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

