Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 Supportive Running Shoe - Spellbound/Yucca/Pink - vs Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 offers superior cushioning and support, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 is a budget-friendly option for neutral runners.
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 offers superior cushioning and support, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 is a budget-friendly option for neutral runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 Supportive Running Shoe - Spellbound/Yucca/Pink - is better
cushioning
Glycerin GTS 23 features advanced DNA TUNED cushioning.
support
Glycerin GTS 23 includes GuideRails for added stability.
durability
Glycerin GTS 23 is built for consistent daily wear.
Why Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 Running Shoe is better
price
Charged Rogue 4 is significantly cheaper.
weight
Charged Rogue 4 is lighter, enhancing speed.
flexibility
Charged Rogue 4 offers better flexibility for neutral runners.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 Supportive Running Shoe - Spellbound/Yucca/Pink - | Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Under Armour |
| Current Price | C$209.95 | C$117.99 |
| Upper Material | Triple jacquard knit | Engineered mesh |
| Midsole Technology | DNA TUNED | Charged Cushioning |
| Offset | 8mm | 8mm |
| Target Audience | Overpronators | Neutral runners |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Shoes
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 and Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 are both excellent choices for runners, but they cater to different needs and preferences. The Glycerin GTS 23 is priced at C$209.95, while the Charged Rogue 4 is more budget-friendly at C$117.99. This price difference reflects their unique features and intended use cases.
Target Audience
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 is designed for runners who appreciate plush cushioning and require added structure, particularly those who overpronate. With its GuideRails technology, this shoe provides mild-to-moderate support, making it an excellent choice for daily runs and long-distance training. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 caters to neutral runners who seek a blend of flexibility and cushioning. This makes it suitable for a variety of running styles, particularly for individuals who enjoy a lightweight feel.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 excels with its zonal nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning. This feature provides a plush feel that softens landings and energizes toe-offs, ideal for those longer runs or recovery days. The Glycerin GTS 23's high-stack midsole offers a smooth transition from heel to toe, promoting stability and comfort. Conversely, the Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 uses a Charged Cushioning midsole that prioritizes responsiveness and durability. While it provides adequate comfort, the overall plushness may not compare to that of the Glycerin GTS 23.
Upper Design
The upper construction of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 features a triple jacquard warp-knit design that ensures breathability and adaptive comfort. This engineered upper wraps the foot securely, allowing for natural movement while running. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 boasts a full-length engineered mesh upper, which is lightweight and breathable. While both designs focus on comfort and breathability, the Glycerin GTS 23 may offer a more structured, secure fit for those needing additional support.
Durability and Traction
Durability is an essential factor when choosing running shoes, and both options showcase commendable features. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 is built to withstand daily wear, making it a reliable choice for consistent runners. Its high-stack midsole not only enhances comfort but also contributes to the shoe's overall durability. The Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 also emphasizes durability with its rubber outsole, designed for traction and flexibility during toe-off. However, the Glycerin GTS 23's additional supportive features may offer a longer lifespan for runners who require extra stability.
Weight and Feel
The weight of running shoes can significantly impact a runner's performance. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23, while providing substantial cushioning and support, may feel heavier compared to the more lightweight Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4. The Charged Rogue 4 is designed for a close-to-foot feel, which can enhance speed and agility on shorter runs. Runners prioritizing a lightweight shoe for speed might prefer the Charged Rogue 4, while those looking for comfort over long distances may lean towards the Glycerin GTS 23.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two shoes is notable, with the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 retailing at C$209.95 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 at C$117.99. This C$91.96 gap reflects the Glycerin's advanced support features and cushioning technology, which cater to specific running needs. For budget-conscious runners, the Charged Rogue 4 offers solid performance at a more accessible price point, making it a viable option for those who might be new to running or not looking to invest heavily in footwear.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 23 and Under Armour Women's Charged Rogue 4 ultimately depends on your running style and preferences. If you require maximum cushioning and support, particularly if you overpronate or run long distances, the Glycerin GTS 23 is the superior choice despite its higher price. However, if you prefer a lightweight shoe that offers flexibility and a close-to-foot feel for neutral running, the Charged Rogue 4 is an excellent option that won’t break the bank.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

