Intel Core i5 Core 12400F Desktop Processor 18M Cache vs Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225
Updated August 2026 — The Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225 is the more cost-effective choice with advanced features, while the Intel Core i5 offers better single-thread performance.
The Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225 is the more cost-effective choice with advanced features, while the Intel Core i5 offers better single-thread performance.
Why Intel Core i5 Core 12400F Desktop Processor 18M Cache is better
higher turbo frequency
Intel Core i5 can reach up to 4.4 GHz
larger cache size
Intel Core i5 has an 18MB cache
strong single-thread performance
Intel Core i5 excels in single-thread tasks
Why Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225 is better
lower price
Intel Core Ultra 5 is priced at C$239.99
higher max memory support
Intel Core Ultra 5 supports up to 256 GB
hybrid core architecture
Intel Core Ultra 5 has 10 cores for multitasking
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Intel Core i5 Core 12400F Desktop Processor 18M Cache | Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Price (CAD) | C$308.17 | C$239.99 |
| Cores | 6 Performance | 6 Performance + 4 Efficient |
| Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Cache Size | 18MB | N/A |
| Max Memory | N/A | 256GB |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When comparing the prices of the Intel Core i5 Core 12400F Desktop Processor and the Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225, the latter is the more affordable option. The Intel Core i5 is priced at C$308.17, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 comes in at C$239.99. This results in a difference of C$68.18, making the Ultra 5 an attractive choice for budget-conscious consumers who still seek solid performance for everyday tasks and gaming.
Performance Overview
In terms of performance, the Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225 features a 10-core configuration, including six Performance-cores and four Efficient-cores. This hybrid architecture allows it to effectively manage both demanding applications and background tasks, optimising resource allocation. In contrast, the Intel Core i5 has six cores (all Performance-cores) and can reach a turbo frequency of up to 4.4 GHz. While the i5 offers strong single-thread performance, the Ultra 5's design facilitates improved multitasking capabilities, especially useful for users engaging in content creation or gaming.
Power Consumption
Both processors have a base power rating of 65 watts, which indicates that they are designed to operate efficiently without excessive energy consumption. This is beneficial for users looking to build or upgrade systems with minimal heat output and power draw. The comparable power ratings suggest that neither processor is a significantly better choice in terms of energy efficiency, allowing users to prioritise other features over power consumption alone.
Cache Size
The Intel Core i5 Core 12400F boasts an 18MB cache, which can enhance performance in data-heavy applications by reducing latency. On the other hand, the Intel Core Ultra 5 does not specify a cache size in the available data, but its architecture suggests a focus on optimising performance through its hybrid core design. For users who rely heavily on cache size for applications like gaming or data processing, the Intel Core i5 may offer a slight edge.
Memory Support
The Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225 supports a maximum memory size of 256 GB, which is significantly higher than what the Intel Core i5 can support. While the specific maximum memory for the i5 is not listed, typical configurations suggest it is lower than the Ultra 5. This capability makes the Ultra 5 a more suitable option for users who plan to run memory-intensive applications or multitask with multiple demanding programs simultaneously.
Integrated Features
The Intel Core Ultra 5 includes an integrated NPU, which enhances its ability to perform tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This feature positions the Ultra 5 as a forward-thinking processor, capable of improving the user experience in applications that leverage these technologies. The Intel Core i5 does not mention any integrated AI capabilities, which might limit its utility in certain emerging tech applications. For users interested in the latest technological advancements, the Ultra 5 could provide a more future-proof solution.
Gaming and Content Creation
For gaming and content creation, the Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225 is designed with its hybrid core architecture to manage performance and efficiency effectively. It features six 3.3 GHz Performance-cores that handle gaming and demanding applications, while the Efficient-cores support background processes. In comparison, the Intel Core i5's higher turbo frequency may provide an advantage in scenarios where raw clock speed is critical. However, the Ultra 5’s architecture could translate into smoother overall performance during multitasking, appealing to gamers and content creators alike.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Intel Core i5 Core 12400F and the Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. The Ultra 5 is the more cost-effective option at C$239.99, offering advanced features like a hybrid core design and support for up to 256 GB of memory, making it suitable for users interested in multitasking and future-proofing their systems. Conversely, if you prioritise single-thread performance and cache size, the Intel Core i5 at C$308.17 might be the better choice. Both processors have their strengths, so consider your usage requirements, budget, and whether you value raw performance or enhanced multitasking capabilities when making your decision.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

