LGA 2011 CPU Cooler 230w TDP 3pin 12VDC 2000RPM Hydraulic Bearing CPU Cooler wit vs Thermalright Burst Assassin 120 SE ARGB CPU Air Cooler
Updated August 2026 — The Thermalright Burst Assassin 120 SE ARGB CPU Air Cooler offers superior cooling performance and compatibility, making it the better choice overall.
The Thermalright Burst Assassin 120 SE ARGB CPU Air Cooler offers superior cooling performance and compatibility, making it the better choice overall.
Why LGA 2011 CPU Cooler 230w TDP 3pin 12VDC 2000RPM Hydraulic Bearing CPU Cooler wit is better
quieter operation
LGA 2011 CPU Cooler operates at 22 dB
longer lifespan
LGA 2011 CPU Cooler lasts up to 50,000 hours
easier installation
LGA 2011 CPU Cooler has a straightforward 3-pin interface
Why Thermalright Burst Assassin 120 SE ARGB CPU Air Cooler is better
better cooling
Thermalright Burst Assassin has 66.17 CFM airflow
wider compatibility
Thermalright supports multiple Intel and AMD sockets
aesthetic appeal
Thermalright features ARGB lighting
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | LGA 2011 CPU Cooler 230w TDP 3pin 12VDC 2000RPM Hydraulic Bearing CPU Cooler wit | Thermalright Burst Assassin 120 SE ARGB CPU Air Cooler |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Cuifati | Thermalright |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA 2011 B | LGA 1150/1151/1155/1156/1200/1700/1851, AM4/AM5 |
| Bearing Type | Hydraulic | S-FDB |
| Installation Ease | Easy | Moderate |
| Light Effects | None | ARGB |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Thermalright Burst Assassin 120 SE ARGB CPU Air Cooler is slightly more affordable than the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler. The Burst Assassin is priced at C$29.90, while the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler comes in at C$30.15. This makes the Burst Assassin a more budget-friendly option for those looking to save a few cents while still acquiring a quality CPU cooler. Both coolers offer competitive pricing within their respective categories, but the price difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers.
Cooling Performance
The Thermalright Burst Assassin boasts a superior cooling performance compared to the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler. With a maximum airflow of 66.17 CFM and fan speeds reaching 1550 RPM, the Burst Assassin is designed for optimal heat dissipation. In contrast, the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler has a maximum airflow of 48 CFM and operates at 2000 RPM. While the LGA model runs at a higher RPM, its lower airflow suggests it may not cool as effectively as the Burst Assassin. Therefore, if cooling performance is paramount, the Thermalright cooler is the clear winner.
Compatibility
Compatibility is a critical factor when selecting a CPU cooler, and both products cater to different needs. The LGA 2011 CPU Cooler is specifically designed for 2011 motherboards of version B, making it unsuitable for other versions. On the other hand, the Thermalright Burst Assassin offers broader compatibility, supporting various Intel sockets including LGA 1150, 1151, 1155, 1156, 1200, 1700, and 1851, as well as AMD sockets AM4 and AM5. This versatility makes the Burst Assassin more appealing for users who may upgrade their systems in the future.
Noise Levels
In terms of noise levels, both coolers are designed to operate quietly, but there is a slight difference in their specifications. The LGA 2011 CPU Cooler operates at a noise level of 22 dB, while the Thermalright Burst Assassin can reach up to 25.6 dB. Although both are relatively quiet, the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler has the edge in terms of silent operation. However, the Burst Assassin’s PWM fan technology helps maintain a balance between performance and low noise, which may be important for users prioritizing a quiet computing environment.
Installation Ease
Both coolers are designed for easy installation, but the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler has an advantage with its straightforward 3-pin interface. This feature simplifies the installation process and saves time for users. The Thermalright Burst Assassin, while also designed for easy installation, requires specific mounting plates and fastener parts for different CPU socket platforms. Users with varying CPU setups might find the LGA cooler easier to install without any additional components, making it a more user-friendly choice.
Lifespan and Durability
When considering lifespan, the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler has a notable advantage with a lifespan of up to 50,000 hours due to its hydraulic bearing design. This longevity ensures consistent cooling performance over time. The Thermalright Burst Assassin does not specify its lifespan, which may raise questions about its durability in the long run. Consumers looking for a cooler that promises extended use may find the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler to be a more reliable option in this regard.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the Thermalright Burst Assassin incorporates ARGB lighting, which adds an aesthetic appeal for users who value visual flair in their build. The LGA 2011 CPU Cooler, however, lacks any lighting effects, focusing purely on functionality. While the Burst Assassin's design may attract gamers and PC builders aiming for a vibrant setup, the LGA cooler prioritizes simplicity and efficiency. The choice between the two may depend on individual preferences for aesthetics versus practicality.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler and the Thermalright Burst Assassin 120 SE ARGB CPU Air Cooler hinges on your specific needs and preferences. If you are looking for a cooler with better compatibility across various CPU sockets, superior cooling performance, and an appealing design with ARGB lighting, the Thermalright Burst Assassin is the better choice. However, if you have a specific 2011 motherboard version B and prioritize quiet operation, long lifespan, and easy installation, the LGA 2011 CPU Cooler may suit you better. Consider your system requirements and personal preferences to make the best decision for your cooling needs.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

