MOVA P10 Pro Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop 13 vs iRobot Roomba 104 2in1 Vacuum & Mop Robot - Self-Empties for 75 Days
Updated August 2026 — The MOVA P10 Pro offers superior suction power and extensive coverage, making it ideal for larger homes. The iRobot Roomba 104 is a budget-friendly option with effective cleaning features.
The MOVA P10 Pro offers superior suction power and extensive coverage, making it ideal for larger homes. The iRobot Roomba 104 is a budget-friendly option with effective cleaning features.
Why MOVA P10 Pro Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop 13 is better
Suction Power
MOVA has 13,000Pa suction compared to Roomba's 70X power-lifting suction.
Coverage Area
MOVA covers up to 4,300 sqft, while Roomba's coverage is unspecified.
Customization
MOVA offers more app customization options for cleaning routines.
Why iRobot Roomba 104 2in1 Vacuum & Mop Robot - Self-Empties for 75 Days is better
Price
Roomba is significantly cheaper at C$299.99.
Hands-Free Cleaning
Roomba empties into a bag that traps 99% of allergens.
Smart Mapping
Roomba uses ClearView LiDAR for efficient navigation.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | MOVA P10 Pro Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop 13 | iRobot Roomba 104 2in1 Vacuum & Mop Robot - Self-Empties for 75 Days |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mova | iRobot |
| App Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto-Empty | Yes | Yes |
| Voice Control | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 3.0 kg |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Product Pair
When comparing robotic vacuums, the MOVA P10 Pro Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop 13 and the iRobot Roomba 104 2in1 Vacuum & Mop Robot stand out. The MOVA is priced at C$630.50, while the iRobot offers a more budget-friendly option at C$299.99. Both products provide advanced cleaning capabilities, but they cater to different needs and preferences.
Suction Power and Cleaning Efficiency
The MOVA P10 Pro boasts a powerful suction capability of 13,000Pa, making it suitable for tackling a variety of messes, including dust, pet hair, and crumbs. In contrast, the iRobot Roomba 104 features a unique suction system that claims to deliver 70 times more power-lifting suction. This significant difference indicates that while both offer strong cleaning capabilities, the Roomba may provide superior dirt removal, especially in challenging conditions.
Mopping Functionality
The MOVA P10 Pro includes an automatic mopping feature, with a mop that lifts to avoid wetting carpets during cleaning. This ensures that both hard floors and carpets are treated appropriately. On the other hand, the iRobot Roomba 104 is designed to automatically detect carpets while mopping, ensuring that rugs stay dry. The ability of both devices to handle mopping makes them versatile, but the Roomba adds the convenience of not requiring user intervention to avoid carpets.
Dust Management
Dust management is simpler with the MOVA P10 Pro, featuring a 3.2L dust bag that allows for 75 days of hands-free cleaning. This is complemented by an auto-empty function that ensures ongoing performance without frequent maintenance. Meanwhile, the iRobot Roomba 104 also offers a similar level of convenience, emptying into its AutoEmpty dock with a bag that traps 99% of allergens. Both systems provide effective dust management, but the MOVA’s larger dust capacity might appeal to those with more extensive cleaning needs.
Smart Features
Smart technology plays a crucial role in both robotic vacuums. The MOVA P10 Pro features an interactive app that allows users to set cleaning schedules, create virtual walls, and customize cleaning modes. Additionally, the intelligent RGB camera aids in precise object avoidance. The iRobot Roomba 104 excels in mapping and navigation with its ClearView LiDAR technology, ensuring efficient cleaning even in low-light conditions. Both products leverage smart features to enhance user experience, but the MOVA offers more customization options for cleaning routines.
User Control and Customization
The MOVA P10 Pro provides comprehensive control through its app, allowing users to schedule cleaning sessions and define specific areas for cleaning or avoidance. In comparison, the iRobot Roomba 104 also allows for scheduling and has customizable cleaning settings, including vac only, mop only, or a combination of both. While both models offer robust control options, the MOVA’s app may provide a more tailored experience with virtual wall settings.
Smart Home Integration
When it comes to smart home integration, both the MOVA P10 Pro and the iRobot Roomba 104 offer convenient ways to control the device. The MOVA allows for app control and interactive video calls, while the Roomba can be operated through voice commands via compatible smart home devices. This feature enhances the user experience, allowing for seamless integration into existing smart home ecosystems.
Cleaning Area Coverage
The MOVA P10 Pro can cover a vast mopping area of up to 4,300 sqft, making it ideal for larger homes. Its dual extensions ensure thorough cleaning in corners and edges, reaching areas that might be missed by less capable models. The iRobot Roomba 104, while designed for efficiency, does not specify coverage area, which may limit its appeal for larger spaces. Homeowners with extensive areas to clean might find the MOVA P10 Pro more suitable for their needs.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the MOVA P10 Pro Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop 13 and the iRobot Roomba 104 ultimately depends on your specific cleaning needs and budget. If you require a powerful suction capability, extensive coverage, and advanced customization options, the MOVA P10 Pro at C$630.50 is a strong contender. However, if you are looking for a more affordable option with effective cleaning features and smart technology, the iRobot Roomba 104 at C$299.99 offers excellent value for money. Both products are equipped to handle everyday cleaning tasks, but your choice should reflect your priorities in price, performance, and specific functionalities.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

