vsversusfinder

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes

Updated August 2026The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 offers superior cushioning and advanced features, making it a better choice for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 offers superior cushioning and advanced features, making it a better choice for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is better

price

Fresh Foam 520 V9 is C$94.99, more affordable than Gel-Cumulus 28

weight

Fresh Foam 520 V9 is lighter, providing a more agile feel

simplicity

Fresh Foam 520 V9 has a minimalistic design, appealing to those who prefer simplicity

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes is better

cushioning

Gel-Cumulus 28 features FF BLAST MAX for superior comfort

traction

Gel-Cumulus 28 includes AHAR LO rubber for enhanced grip

breathability

Gel-Cumulus 28's engineered mesh upper promotes better airflow

Overall score

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe
75
ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes
88

Specifications

SpecNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running ShoeASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes
BrandNew BalanceASICS
ModelFresh Foam 520 V9Gel-Cumulus 28
Upper MaterialMeshEngineered Mesh
Midsole TechnologyFresh FoamFF BLAST MAX
Outsole TechnologyNot specifiedFLUIDRIDE
SocklinerNot specifiedOrthoLite X-30

Dimension comparison

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running ShoeASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes

Overview of the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 and ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 and ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 are both high-quality running shoes designed for comfort and performance. The Fresh Foam 520 V9 is priced at C$94.99, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to the Gel-Cumulus 28, which retails for C$179.90. While both shoes focus on providing a comfortable running experience, they incorporate different technologies and materials that cater to various runner preferences.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers a sleek, minimalistic look with a breathable mesh upper that emphasizes functionality. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 features a unique gradient spray on its upper and midsole, inspired by the colours of sunrise and sunset, which adds a visually appealing touch. The Gel-Cumulus 28 is part of the SUNNY SIZZLE Collection, aimed at providing both style and performance for runners who enjoy running during warmer seasons.

Comfort and Fit

Comfort is a crucial factor for any running shoe, and both models deliver in distinct ways. The Fresh Foam 520 V9 is equipped with a Fresh Foam midsole that provides an ultra-cushioned and lightweight ride, making it suitable for those who prefer a soft underfoot feel. On the other hand, the Gel-Cumulus 28 employs FF BLAST MAX cushioning, offering a cloud-like softness and responsive energy return with each step. Both shoes utilize engineered mesh uppers for breathability, but the Gel-Cumulus 28's design aims to reduce the need for additional overlays, enhancing comfort.

Cushioning Technologies

Cushioning technology is where the two shoes noticeably diverge. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 features a Fresh Foam midsole that is precision engineered for a lightweight ride, though specific energy return metrics are not provided. In comparison, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 boasts FF BLAST MAX foam, noted as one of ASICS' most energetic cushioning technologies. This shoe also includes PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, promising enhanced comfort and performance for longer runs.

Outsole Performance

The outsole performance of running shoes can significantly affect traction and durability. The Fresh Foam 520 V9 is designed with a focus on durability and a responsive ride, although specific material details are not provided. In contrast, the Gel-Cumulus 28 features a FLUIDRIDE outsole, which combines EVA and rubber for added comfort and traction without sacrificing durability. Furthermore, the Gel-Cumulus 28 includes an AHAR LO heel plug rubber, enhancing grip in key areas, making it a solid option for varied running surfaces.

Breathability and Temperature Control

Breathability is essential for keeping your feet cool during runs, especially in warmer conditions. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 incorporates a lightweight, breathable mesh upper, promoting airflow and comfort. Similarly, the Gel-Cumulus 28's engineered mesh upper is designed to keep your feet cool and comfortable, particularly during spring and summer runs. The sockliner in the Gel-Cumulus 28 also features moisture management properties, ensuring a drier environment, which can be a significant advantage for long-distance runners.

Target Audience

The target audience for each shoe differs based on their features and pricing. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 appeals to budget-conscious runners looking for a reliable and comfortable shoe without breaking the bank. At a price point of C$94.99, it offers excellent value. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28, priced at C$179.90, is aimed at serious runners who prioritize advanced cushioning technologies and are willing to invest more for enhanced performance and comfort.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 and ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 largely depends on your running style, budget, and preference for cushioning technology. If you're looking for a more economical option that still delivers comfort and breathability, the Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a solid choice. However, if you are willing to invest more for advanced features like FF BLAST MAX cushioning and superior grip, the Gel-Cumulus 28 might be the better option. Ultimately, both shoes have their strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 28 Running Shoes | versusfinder