vsversusfinder

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes

Updated August 2026The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers advanced cushioning and eco-friendly features, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a budget-friendly option with solid comfort. Ultimately, the ASICS is the better choice for serious runners.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers advanced cushioning and eco-friendly features, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a budget-friendly option with solid comfort. Ultimately, the ASICS is the better choice for serious runners.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is better

price

New Balance is C$94.99, more affordable than ASICS at C$160.00.

lightweight

New Balance is designed as a lightweight shoe.

casual use

New Balance is suitable for casual runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes is better

cushioning

ASICS features advanced PureGEL technology for better cushioning.

sustainability

ASICS uses at least 75% recycled materials in its upper.

comfort

ASICS provides superior comfort for long-distance running.

Overall score

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe
75
ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
88

Specifications

SpecNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running ShoeASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
BrandNew BalanceASICS
Upper MaterialMeshJacquard Mesh
Cushioning TechFresh FoamPureGEL
Eco-FriendlyNoYes
Target AudienceCasual RunnersSerious Runners

Dimension comparison

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running ShoeASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes

Overview of New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe and ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes

When comparing the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, a clear distinction emerges in their pricing and features. The New Balance model is priced at C$94.99, while the ASICS option is significantly higher at C$160.00. This price difference suggests that the ASICS shoes may offer additional features or technologies that justify the cost.

Comfort and Cushioning

Comfort is a crucial aspect for any running shoe, and both models offer unique cushioning technologies. The New Balance 520 V9 features a Fresh Foam midsole, engineered for an ultra-cushioned and lightweight ride. This design aims to provide a comfortable experience over long distances. On the other hand, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates PureGEL technology, which not only enhances lightweight cushioning but also aims to deliver softer landings. The comfort level may vary depending on personal preference; however, the ASICS shoe seems to focus more on advanced cushioning technology.

Upper Material and Breathability

The upper construction of running shoes significantly affects breathability and fit. The New Balance 520 V9 is designed with lightweight, breathable mesh, ensuring good airflow and comfort during runs. Meanwhile, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 features an engineered jacquard mesh upper, which wraps the foot with a soft feel. Additionally, at least 75% of the upper material is made with recycled content, reflecting a commitment to sustainability. Therefore, if eco-friendliness and softness are priorities, the ASICS shoe may have the edge.

Weight and Performance

Weight can influence running performance, particularly for long-distance runners. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is described as a lightweight shoe, making it a versatile option for various running activities. In contrast, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 does not explicitly state its weight, its advanced cushioning technologies may add weight compared to simpler designs. However, the performance benefits from its cushioning may outweigh any additional weight, depending on the runner’s needs.

Environmental Considerations

In today's market, sustainability is increasingly important to consumers. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out in this area, as it uses at least 75% recycled materials for its main upper. Furthermore, the sockliner is produced with a solution dyeing process that reduces water usage by approximately 33% and carbon emissions by around 45%. The New Balance 520 V9 does not highlight any eco-friendly materials or processes, making the ASICS model the more environmentally conscious choice.

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is significantly more accessible at C$94.99, compared to the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27, which retails for C$160.00. This C$65.01 difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious runners. While the ASICS may offer advanced features and technologies, the New Balance model provides a more economical option without sacrificing basic comfort and functionality.

Target Audience

Understanding who each shoe is designed for can also influence purchasing decisions. The New Balance 520 V9 is a great choice for casual runners or those new to running, providing comfort and a lightweight design at an affordable price. Conversely, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 targets more serious runners who may require advanced cushioning and support for longer distances. This distinction in target audience is crucial for consumers when making a choice based on their running habits and experience levels.

Style and Aesthetics

Aesthetics can play a significant role in a runner's choice of footwear. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 combines a simple design with functional elements, making it versatile enough for both running and casual wear. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers a more modern look, enhanced by the engineered jacquard mesh upper. The choice between these two will depend largely on personal style preferences, but both offer appealing designs for different tastes.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes ultimately hinges on individual preferences and priorities. If budget is a primary concern, the New Balance option offers excellent value at C$94.99 while still providing comfort for casual runners. However, for those willing to invest more for advanced cushioning and eco-friendly features, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 at C$160.00 presents a compelling case. Assessing comfort, environmental impact, and performance needs will guide you to the right choice for your running journey.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes | versusfinder