New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes
Updated August 2026 — The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 offers superior performance features and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 offers superior performance features and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper at C$94.99.
Weight
New Balance is lighter, making it suitable for casual use.
Versatility
New Balance is ideal for everyday activities beyond running.
Why ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes is better
Cushioning
ASICS features advanced FF BLAST PLUS cushioning.
Stability
ASICS includes a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better stability.
Durability
ASICS has an ASICSGRIP outsole for improved traction and longevity.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe | ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | New Balance | ASICS |
| Model | Fresh Foam 520 V9 | Noosa TRI 16 |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Midsole | Fresh Foam | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Outsole | Rubber | ASICSGRIP |
| Target Audience | Casual Runners | Serious Athletes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is designed for those seeking a lightweight and cushioned running experience. Priced at C$94.99, it combines a durable and breathable mesh upper with a Fresh Foam midsole that promises an ultra-cushioned ride. This shoe is ideal for casual runners who prioritise comfort and versatility in their footwear.
The shoe’s construction features a Fresh Foam midsole that is precision-engineered to provide a lightweight feel while maintaining adequate cushioning. This makes it suitable for everyday use on various road surfaces, appealing to runners who prefer a blend of performance and comfort. The overall design and price point position it as an accessible option for everyday runners.
Key Features of ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes offer advanced technology for a performance-oriented running experience. At a higher price of C$179.90, these shoes incorporate several features aimed at enhancing stability and comfort during runs. With FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, they are tailored for those who demand more from their footwear.
The FF BLAST PLUS cushioning is noted as ASICS' softest yet lightweight material, providing an exceptional level of comfort without adding bulk. Additionally, the engineered mesh upper enhances breathability, making these shoes suitable for warmer conditions. The unique full-ground contact design ensures a smoother and more efficient ride, catering to runners looking for high performance and stability during their activities.
Comfort and Cushioning Comparison
In terms of comfort, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 focuses on providing a plush experience through its Fresh Foam midsole, which is engineered specifically for lightweight cushioning. This shoe is designed for everyday use, making it a great choice for those who enjoy casual running or walking.
On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 takes comfort a step further with its FF BLAST PLUS cushioning system, which is specifically crafted to offer exceptional softness while remaining lightweight. This shoe also features the 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which adds a layer of adaptive stability, making it ideal for runners who may experience foot fatigue during longer runs. The Noosa TRI 16 clearly targets performance-oriented runners who need both comfort and advanced support.
Breathability and Fit
When it comes to breathability, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 utilises a breathable mesh upper that ensures air circulation, helping to keep feet cool and comfortable during runs. This feature is crucial for those who run in warmer climates or prefer a shoe that can manage moisture effectively.
In contrast, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 also boasts an engineered mesh upper, which is designed to improve breathability while providing a snug fit. This shoe's fit, along with its padded collar and round toe silhouette, enhances overall comfort during runs. Both shoes offer excellent breathability, but the Noosa TRI 16’s engineered design may provide a slight edge for runners looking for a more performance-oriented fit.
Durability and Construction
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is built to withstand regular wear with its durable materials, making it a reliable choice for everyday runners. Its construction balances lightweight design with sturdiness, ensuring that it can handle the rigours of regular road running.
ASICS, with its Women’s Noosa TRI 16, includes features like the ASICSGRIP outsole, which improves durability and traction. The full-ground contact design not only enhances efficiency but also contributes to the shoe's overall durability, making it suitable for various running conditions. While both shoes promise a degree of durability, the Noosa TRI 16 may offer more longevity for serious runners due to its advanced construction techniques.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 and the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 is significant, with the former retailing at C$94.99 and the latter at C$179.90. This C$84.91 difference reflects the additional technological features and performance enhancements found in the Noosa TRI 16, appealing to more serious runners who require specific performance attributes.
In contrast, the New Balance option represents a budget-friendly choice for casual runners or those new to the sport, making it an attractive option for individuals prioritising cost over advanced features. The pricing clearly indicates two different segments of the running shoe market, with the New Balance focusing on accessibility and the ASICS targeting performance.
Target Audience and Use Case
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is perfect for casual runners or those looking for a reliable shoe for everyday activities. Its combination of comfort, lightweight construction, and affordability makes it an ideal choice for individuals who may not run competitively but still enjoy staying active.
Conversely, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 is tailored for more serious athletes or runners who participate in triathlons or longer races. With its advanced cushioning, stability features, and higher price point, it caters to individuals who are willing to invest in their footwear for enhanced performance and comfort during extended runs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 and the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 largely depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you are a casual runner looking for a comfortable and affordable shoe, the New Balance option is a great fit at C$94.99. However, if you are a dedicated runner seeking advanced performance features and are willing to invest C$179.90 for enhanced comfort and stability, the ASICS Noosa TRI 16 is the superior choice. Each shoe serves its purpose well, but understanding your requirements will guide your decision effectively.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

