New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe vs Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers superior cushioning, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 excels in versatility and value.
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers superior cushioning, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 excels in versatility and value.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is better
Cushioning
New Balance features ultra-cushioned Fresh Foam midsole.
Brand reputation
New Balance is known for high-quality running shoes.
Weight
New Balance is marketed as a lightweight option.
Why Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 Running Shoe is better
Price
Saucony is more budget-friendly at C$75.95.
Versatility
Saucony is suitable for both road and trail running.
Durability
Saucony features durable mesh that is debris resistant.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe | Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | New Balance | Saucony |
| Cushioning Type | Fresh Foam | VERSARUN |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Mesh |
| Best For | Road Running | Trail/Casual |
| Fit | Comfortable | Secure |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When considering the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 Running Shoe, the price difference is notable. The New Balance model is priced at C$94.99, while the Saucony option is more budget-friendly at C$75.95. This places the Saucony shoe C$19.04 less expensive than the New Balance version. For those on a tighter budget, the Saucony may seem like the more appealing choice, while the New Balance shoe might justify its higher price with advanced cushioning technology.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a crucial factor in running shoes, and here, both models offer unique cushioning systems. The New Balance shoe features Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, designed to deliver an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride. In contrast, the Saucony model utilises VERSARUN cushioning, which absorbs impact and reduces pressure points, ensuring a smooth transition from heel to toe. Both cushioning technologies aim to enhance the running experience, yet the New Balance might provide a slightly softer feel due to its emphasis on ultra-cushioning.
Breathability
Breathability is vital for runners, especially during longer runs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 boasts a lightweight, breathable mesh upper, which helps keep feet cool and comfortable. Similarly, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 features light, breathable mesh that promotes ventilation. Both shoes effectively address breathability, ensuring a fresh feeling during runs. However, the choice may come down to personal preference in fit and style, as both shoes utilise mesh materials to enhance airflow.
Versatility
When it comes to versatility, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 appears to have an edge. It is designed for both daily trail running and casual treks, featuring mild 3.5mm lugs that grip a variety of surfaces. This makes it suitable for more diverse terrain, from road to trail. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is described as a durable, versatile runner but does not specifically highlight its suitability for trail use. Runners who frequently change their running environment may find the Saucony a more adaptable option.
Weight
Weight can significantly impact a runner's performance. While specific weight data isn't provided, the New Balance shoe is marketed as a lightweight option due to its Fresh Foam midsole and breathable mesh. The Saucony model, while also lightweight, focuses on providing comfort and support for both trail and road running. Runners seeking a featherlight option may lean towards the New Balance, whereas those prioritising a balance of weight and versatility might prefer the Saucony.
Durability
Durability is essential for runners looking for long-lasting footwear. The New Balance model is constructed to be durable and versatile, although specific materials are not detailed. The Saucony shoe, however, includes durable mesh that is debris resistant, making it particularly suitable for trail running. This suggests that the Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 may withstand harsher conditions better than the New Balance option, appealing to runners who frequently encounter rugged terrains.
Fit and Security
Fit and security are paramount for running shoes, affecting performance and comfort. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is designed for a comfortable fit, although specifics on the fit are not provided. The Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 explicitly states it offers a comfortable and secure fit, which is crucial for maintaining stability while running. Runners who value a snug, secure fit may find the Saucony model more appealing, especially for varied terrains.
Which should you buy?
Both the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 17 Running Shoe offer unique advantages. The New Balance shoe is pricier at C$94.99 and focuses on ultra-cushioned comfort, making it a great choice for those prioritising cushioning in their running experience. In contrast, the Saucony model, priced at C$75.95, provides excellent value with its versatile design suitable for various terrains and features like VERSARUN cushioning. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your specific running needs: if budget and versatility are key, the Saucony may be the better option; if you seek comfort and cushioning, the New Balance could be worth the investment.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

