New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe vs Under Armour Women's Aurora 3
Updated August 2026 — The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers superior cushioning and comfort, while the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 is more budget-friendly with a tailored fit for women.
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers superior cushioning and comfort, while the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 is more budget-friendly with a tailored fit for women.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is better
cushioning
Fresh Foam technology provides ultra-cushioned comfort
brand reputation
New Balance is known for high-quality running shoes
overall comfort
Designed for both casual and serious runners
Why Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 is better
price
More affordable at C$79.99
female fit
Specifically designed for the female foot
durability
Full rubber outsole for maximum durability
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe | Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | New Balance | Under Armour |
| Price | C$94.99 | C$79.99 |
| Cushioning | Fresh Foam | Charged+ |
| Upper Material | Breathable mesh | Mesh with suede |
| Weight | Lightweight | 9 oz. |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is designed for runners seeking a lightweight and cushioned experience. Priced at C$94.99, it features a Fresh Foam midsole that is precision engineered to provide an ultra-cushioned ride. This shoe combines a durable construction with a breathable mesh upper, making it suitable for various running conditions. The focus on cushioning and comfort makes it a great option for both casual joggers and more serious runners.
Overview of the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3
The Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 is tailored specifically for the female foot and is available at a lower price of C$79.99. This model boasts a streamlined fit with a soft, breathable mesh upper complemented by suede details for added style. The updated Charged+ midsole cushioning enhances comfort and performance, making it ideal for those who want both aesthetics and functionality in their running shoes. With a focus on support and durability, the Aurora 3 aims to provide a comprehensive running experience.
Cushioning and Comfort Comparison
When it comes to cushioning, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 features a Fresh Foam midsole that is engineered for an ultra-cushioned feel, making it a strong contender for comfort-focused runners. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 utilises Charged+ midsole cushioning, which is designed to deliver elevated comfort and performance. While both shoes aim to enhance the running experience through cushioning, the Fresh Foam technology in the New Balance shoe is specifically highlighted for its precision engineering, potentially offering a more tailored comfort experience.
Fit and Design
The fit of a running shoe significantly impacts performance, and here the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 shines with its female-specific design and streamlined fit. This shoe is built to support the foot better during dynamic movements, which can be crucial for female runners. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers a more general fit with a focus on breathability and lightweight construction. While both models feature breathable materials, the specific attention to fit in the Aurora 3 may provide an advantage for female athletes looking for support during their runs.
Durability and Traction
Durability is key in running shoes, and the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 offers a full rubber outsole designed for maximum durability, featuring a multidirectional traction pattern. This design is particularly beneficial for varied terrain, providing the traction needed for different surfaces. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is described as durable but does not specify the outsole materials or traction capabilities. As such, the Aurora 3 may offer a more reliable performance in terms of durability and grip, particularly for runners who frequently change surfaces.
Price Point Analysis
Price can be a determining factor for many shoppers, and here, the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 presents a more budget-friendly option at C$79.99, compared to the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9, which is priced at C$94.99. This C$15 difference may appeal to those looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. However, the value proposition is dependent on individual preferences for features such as cushioning and fit, which can justify the higher price of the New Balance model for some consumers.
Target Audience
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 caters to a broad audience, including casual and dedicated runners alike, thanks to its combination of comfort and cushioning. Its versatility makes it suitable for various running styles and preferences. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 is designed specifically for women, focusing on their unique foot structure and fit needs, making it an excellent choice for female athletes who require targeted support and performance. Therefore, the choice between the two largely depends on the buyer's specific requirements and running habits.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 and the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 ultimately hinges on individual preferences and priorities. If you are looking for advanced cushioning and a lightweight feel, the New Balance option might be worth the extra investment at C$94.99. However, if budget is a key consideration and you prefer a shoe specifically tailored for a female fit, the Under Armour model at C$79.99 could be the better choice. Each shoe offers unique advantages, so consider your running style and comfort needs before making a decision.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

