vsversusfinder

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes

Updated August 2026The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 offers a budget-friendly option with plush comfort, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in sustainability and responsive cushioning.

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 offers a budget-friendly option with plush comfort, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in sustainability and responsive cushioning.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 Running Shoe is better

price

C$109.99 vs C$160.00

comfort

plush Fresh Foam cushioning

style

bold athletic design

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes is better

sustainability

75% recycled materials

cushioning

PureGEL technology for softer landings

fit

engineered jacquard mesh upper

Overall score

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 Running Shoe
75
ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
85

Specifications

SpecNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 Running ShoeASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
BrandNew BalanceASICS
PriceC$109.99C$160.00
CushioningFresh FoamPureGEL
Upper Materialbootie upperjacquard mesh
SustainabilityNoYes

Dimension comparison

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 Running ShoeASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 Running Shoe is significantly more affordable at C$109.99 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, which retail for C$160.00. This represents a price difference of C$50.01, making the New Balance option a more budget-friendly choice for those seeking quality running shoes without breaking the bank.

Comfort and Cushioning

The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav V1 features a Fresh Foam midsole designed to provide an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride, giving the impression of running on clouds. On the other hand, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates PureGEL technology, which is specifically engineered to offer lightweight cushioning and softer landings. Both shoes prioritise comfort, but the Fresh Foam technology in the New Balance may appeal more to casual runners looking for plushness, while the ASICS model may attract those who prefer a more responsive cushioning system.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav V1 boasts a bold and attractive look, appealing to those who appreciate casual athletic style. Its Ultra Heel design not only enhances aesthetics but also provides a snug fit. Conversely, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 features an engineered jacquard mesh upper that wraps the foot with a soft feel and is made with at least 75% recycled content. This eco-friendly approach might appeal to environmentally conscious consumers, while New Balance's design leans more towards a sporty and stylish appearance.

Upper Material and Fit

The upper construction of the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav V1 focuses on a bootie upper that enhances comfort and support. This shoe is designed to hug the back of the foot for a secure fit. On the other hand, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 utilises an engineered jacquard mesh upper that offers a soft feel and is made predominantly from recycled materials. While both shoes provide a comfortable fit, the choice may boil down to personal preference regarding the type of upper material and the overall fit experience.

Durability

Durability is a key factor in any running shoe. The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav V1 incorporates NDurance rubber outsole technology, which enhances durability in high-wear areas, ensuring that these shoes can withstand the rigours of regular use. In contrast, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 does not explicitly mention its outsole material or durability features, which could be a consideration for runners looking for longevity in their footwear. Thus, if durability is a primary concern, the New Balance model may have the edge.

Environmental Considerations

For consumers concerned about environmental impact, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out with its commitment to sustainability. At least 75% of its main upper material is made with recycled content, and its sockliner uses a dyeing process that conserves water and reduces carbon emissions. The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav V1 does not highlight any similar environmentally friendly features. Therefore, if sustainability is a significant factor in your purchasing decision, the ASICS model is the more responsible choice.

Performance and Usage

When it comes to performance, both shoes are designed for running, but they cater to slightly different preferences. The New Balance Fresh Foam Roav V1, with its plush cushioning and lightweight feel, is ideal for casual runners or those who value comfort over long distances. In contrast, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is engineered with PureGEL technology that may provide a more responsive experience for serious runners. Thus, while both shoes perform well, the intended use may dictate which model is better suited for your needs.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the decision between the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 Running Shoe and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes boils down to individual priorities. If you are looking for a cost-effective, stylish option that offers plush comfort, the New Balance model at C$109.99 is a great choice. However, if you are willing to invest C$160.00 for enhanced cushioning, sustainable materials, and a soft fit, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 may be the better option. Your choice should reflect your running habits, comfort preferences, and any environmental considerations that are important to you.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav V1 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes | versusfinder