New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes
Updated August 2026 — The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior comfort and advanced features, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the New Balance model is more budget-friendly.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior comfort and advanced features, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the New Balance model is more budget-friendly.
Why New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe is better
price
New Balance is C$254.22 cheaper.
lightweight
New Balance is made from lightweight synthetic materials.
breathability
New Balance has a structured upper for breathability.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes is better
cushioning
ASICS features PureGEL technology for enhanced softness.
durability
ASICS uses advanced materials for better longevity.
performance
ASICS has FF BLAST PLUS cushioning for a responsive ride.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | New Balance | ASICS |
| Midsole | FuelCell foam | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Upper | Structured | Engineered knit |
| Outsole | Standard | HYBRID ASICSGRIP |
| Drop | 6 mm | Not specified |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe is significantly more affordable at C$89.97 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, which retail for C$344.19. This price difference of C$254.22 makes the New Balance option an attractive choice for budget-conscious runners. While both shoes are designed for runners, the substantial cost of the ASICS model reflects its advanced technologies and premium materials, which may appeal to more serious or frequent runners.
Design and Aesthetics
The New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 features a structured upper designed for breathability and a lightweight fit, making it visually appealing for those who prefer a sleek look. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 boasts an engineered knit upper that not only enhances its aesthetic appeal but also reduces the need for additional overlays, contributing to a minimalist design. The Gel-Nimbus 28's contemporary look is complemented by its robust features aimed at providing comfort and performance, making it suitable for both casual and serious runners alike.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is a crucial factor for any running shoe, and here, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 stands out with its premium cushioning technology. It incorporates PureGEL, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, ensuring a plush experience for long-distance runners. The New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5, while also offering a propulsive feel with its FuelCell midsole foam, does not match the cloud-like comfort provided by the ASICS model. This makes the Gel-Nimbus 28 more suitable for individuals prioritizing cushioning on longer runs.
Performance Features
Both running shoes offer unique performance features tailored to enhance the running experience. The New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 utilises a TPU plate for a propulsive feeling, promoting a forward drive. On the other hand, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, which combines lightweight and responsive qualities with a cloud-like feel. This midsole technology, alongside the HYBRID ASICSGRIP outsole that provides advanced grip and durability, positions the Gel-Nimbus 28 as a superior choice for varied terrains and conditions.
Breathability and Temperature Control
Breathability is essential for maintaining comfort during runs, especially in warmer conditions. The New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 includes a structured upper promoting airflow, while the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28's engineered knit upper not only enhances breathability but also offers moisture management through its OrthoLite X-55 sockliner. This combination ensures that the Gel-Nimbus 28 delivers a cooler and drier environment for runners, particularly beneficial for those who often run in hot weather.
Weight and Portability
Weight can significantly impact running performance, and in this comparison, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, making it a more agile option for runners. In contrast, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 is constructed from lightweight synthetic materials, which contribute to its overall portability. However, the specific weight of each model is not provided, making it difficult to directly compare their weights. Both shoes aim to offer a lightweight experience, but the Gel-Nimbus 28's design advancements may provide a marginal edge.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is an essential aspect of running shoes, especially for those who log frequent miles. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features a combination of ASICSGRIP rubber and AHARPLUS materials in its outsole, designed to provide advanced grip and extended durability across various terrains. While the New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 also claims to be lightweight and structurally sound, its durability features are less explicitly detailed. Therefore, the ASICS model may offer better longevity for runners who require a shoe that withstands rigorous use.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for an affordable, lightweight option that offers decent performance for everyday runs, the New Balance model at C$89.97 is a solid choice. However, if you're willing to invest in a premium shoe that excels in comfort, cushioning, and durability for longer distances, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28, priced at C$344.19, is likely to be worth the higher investment.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

