New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe vs ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes
Updated August 2026 — The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes offer advanced features and durability, making them a better choice for serious runners, while the New Balance model is more budget-friendly.
The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes offer advanced features and durability, making them a better choice for serious runners, while the New Balance model is more budget-friendly.
Why New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe is better
price
New Balance is priced at C$89.97, significantly cheaper than ASICS at C$179.90.
lightweight
New Balance features lightweight synthetic material.
aesthetic
New Balance has a sleek and modern design.
Why ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes is better
cushioning
ASICS uses FF BLAST PLUS cushioning for a softer feel.
stability
ASICS includes a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability.
durability
ASICS features ASICSGRIP outsole for improved durability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe | ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | New Balance | ASICS |
| Midsole | FuelCell foam | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Upper | Structured | Engineered mesh |
| Outsole | Standard | ASICSGRIP |
| Drop | 6 mm | Not specified |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe is significantly more affordable than the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes. The FuelCell Propel V5 is priced at C$89.97, while the Noosa TRI 16 costs C$179.90. This presents a price difference of C$89.93, which could be a crucial factor for budget-conscious shoppers. The New Balance model offers excellent value for those looking for a quality running shoe without breaking the bank, while the ASICS model may appeal to those willing to invest more for advanced features.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a key aspect of any running shoe, and both models offer unique cushioning technologies. The New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 features a FuelCell midsole foam that provides a propulsive feel, which is beneficial for forward momentum during runs. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 boasts FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, described as the softest and lightest material in the ASICS lineup. This may provide a plush feel underfoot, making it ideal for longer runs. For those prioritizing comfort, the choice may depend on whether they prefer a more responsive feel or a softer cushioning experience.
Breathability
Breathability is essential for keeping feet cool and comfortable during runs. The New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 has a structured upper designed for breathability and a lightweight fit, which can help in warmer weather. The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16, on the other hand, features an engineered mesh upper that also enhances breathability. Both shoes aim to keep your feet comfortable, but the specific design of the ASICS may offer an edge in airflow due to its engineered mesh, which is often more effective in wicking moisture away from the foot.
Stability Features
Stability can be a deciding factor for runners seeking support during their runs. The New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 does not explicitly mention stability features, focusing more on the propulsive feel of its midsole. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 includes a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM designed to provide adaptive on-demand stability. This can be particularly beneficial for runners who may overpronate or need additional support in their footwear. For those prioritizing stability, the ASICS model clearly stands out.
Weight
The weight of running shoes can affect performance, especially for competitive runners. While exact weights for both models aren't provided, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 is noted for its lightweight synthetic material, which contributes to a nimble running experience. The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 also emphasizes lightweight construction with its FF BLAST PLUS cushioning. While we can't provide specific weights, both models are designed to keep you light on your feet, making them suitable for various running conditions.
Durability
Durability is another important consideration when choosing running shoes. The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 features ASICSGRIP outsole technology, which is designed to improve durability, suggesting that this shoe may withstand harsher conditions and longer wear. In contrast, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 does not highlight any specific durability features. For runners who frequently log miles on tough terrains, the ASICS may offer a better long-term investment due to its enhanced durability features.
Aesthetic Appeal
When selecting running shoes, aesthetics can play a significant role in the decision-making process. The New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 presents a sleek and modern design that appeals to many runners. Similarly, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 features vibrant colourways and a dynamic design that stands out. While both shoes are visually appealing, personal preference will ultimately dictate which model resonates more with individual tastes.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe and the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes hinges on various factors. If budget is a primary concern, the New Balance model at C$89.97 offers excellent value. However, for those prioritizing advanced cushioning, stability features, and potentially greater durability, the ASICS model, priced at C$179.90, may justify the higher cost. Each shoe has its strengths, making the best choice ultimately depend on your specific running needs and preferences.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

