vsversusfinder

New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe vs Under Armour Women's Aurora 3

Updated August 2026The New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 offers superior performance and sustainability features, while the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 is a more budget-friendly option. Choose based on your priorities.

The New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 offers superior performance and sustainability features, while the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 is a more budget-friendly option. Choose based on your priorities.

Why New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe is better

Sustainability

FuelCell Propel V5 has bio-based content in midsole

Performance

TPU plate enhances propulsive experience

Comfort

FuelCell midsole provides a better forward feel

Why Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 is better

Price

Aurora 3 is C$10 cheaper

Weight

Aurora 3 weighs 9 oz, making it lightweight

Durability

Full rubber outsole offers maximum durability

Overall score

New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe
85
Under Armour Women's Aurora 3
75

Specifications

SpecNew Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running ShoeUnder Armour Women's Aurora 3
BrandNew BalanceUnder Armour
ModelFuelCell Propel V5Aurora 3
MidsoleFuelCellCharged+
Upper MaterialSyntheticMesh with suede
DurabilityHighMedium

Dimension comparison

New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running ShoeUnder Armour Women's Aurora 3

Introduction to the New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 and Under Armour Aurora 3

In the realm of women's running shoes, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 and Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 stand out as two compelling options. Both shoes cater to female runners but offer distinct features that may appeal to different preferences. The FuelCell Propel V5 is priced at C$89.97, while the Aurora 3 comes in slightly cheaper at C$79.99. This price difference can be a deciding factor for many shoppers.

Design and Aesthetics

The New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 features a structured upper designed for breathability and a lightweight fit, making it an attractive option for runners seeking comfort and style. In contrast, the Under Armour Aurora 3 is built specifically for the female foot, offering a streamlined fit with a soft, breathable mesh upper adorned with suede details. The aesthetic appeal of both shoes is strong, but the Aurora 3 may resonate more with those looking for a feminine touch in their footwear.

Comfort and Fit

When it comes to comfort, both shoes have unique attributes. The New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 incorporates a FuelCell midsole foam that contains approximately 3% bio-based content, providing a propulsive feel that aids in forward momentum. On the other hand, the Under Armour Aurora 3 features updated Charged+ midsole cushioning, which is specifically designed to enhance comfort and performance. The FuelCell Propel V5 has a 6 mm drop, while the Aurora 3 features a slightly higher offset of 7 mm, which may better suit runners who prefer a more elevated feel.

Performance and Functionality

In terms of performance, the New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 includes a TPU plate that enhances the propulsive experience, making it ideal for faster runs. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Aurora 3's full rubber outsole delivers maximum durability along with a multidirectional traction pattern, which is beneficial for varied terrains. This makes the Aurora 3 a versatile choice for runners who may encounter different surfaces during their workouts.

Weight Considerations

The weight of running shoes can significantly impact performance, and both options have their merits. While the exact weight of the New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 isn't specified, the Under Armour Aurora 3 weighs in at 9 oz. This weight is considered lightweight for a running shoe, which can contribute to a more comfortable running experience over longer distances. Runners seeking a lighter shoe may lean towards the Aurora 3, depending on their specific preferences.

Sustainability Factors

Sustainability is an increasingly important factor for many consumers. The New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 stands out with its bio-based content in the midsole foam, which aims to reduce carbon footprints. Although the Under Armour Aurora 3 does not highlight any specific sustainable features, its overall design and materials are crafted for durability and longevity. For eco-conscious shoppers, the FuelCell Propel V5 may be the more appealing option.

Price Point Analysis

The pricing of both shoes reflects their respective features. The New Balance FuelCell Propel V5 is priced at C$89.97, whereas the Under Armour Aurora 3 is available for C$79.99. This C$10 difference may seem minor, but it could influence budget-conscious consumers. The added features and technologies in the FuelCell Propel V5 may justify its higher price for some, while others may find the affordability of the Aurora 3 more attractive without sacrificing essential performance attributes.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 and the Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences as a runner. If you prioritise sustainability and a propulsive feel, the FuelCell Propel V5, priced at C$89.97, is an excellent option. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly choice that still offers comfort and versatility, the Aurora 3 at C$79.99 could be the better fit. Both shoes cater to women’s unique needs in running, ensuring that whichever option you choose, you'll be equipped for your next run.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

New Balance Women's FuelCell Propel V5 Running Shoe vs Under Armour Women's Aurora 3 | versusfinder