PGID Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo vs Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 with Wi-Fi Voice Control .45-Quart Dust Cup Capacit
Updated August 2026 — The PGID Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum offers superior features and convenience compared to the Shark ION Robot Vacuum. It is the better choice for those seeking advanced cleaning technology.
The PGID Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum offers superior features and convenience compared to the Shark ION Robot Vacuum. It is the better choice for those seeking advanced cleaning technology.
Why PGID Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo is better
Self-Emptying
PGID has a self-emptying station for 60 days of debris storage.
Cleaning Technology
PGID's dual-brush system simulates manual mopping.
Maintenance
PGID requires less frequent maintenance due to larger dust capacity.
Why Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 with Wi-Fi Voice Control .45-Quart Dust Cup Capacit is better
Runtime
Shark ION has a runtime of up to 120 minutes.
Voice Control
Shark ION supports voice commands via Alexa and Google Assistant.
Price
Shark ION is priced C$20 higher but offers different features.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | PGID Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo | Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 with Wi-Fi Voice Control .45-Quart Dust Cup Capacit |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | PGID | Shark |
| Model | Self-Emptying | AV752 |
| Control | App | Voice |
| Cleaning Type | Dual-Brush | Tri-Brush |
| Self-Emptying | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the PGID Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo is more affordable than the Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752. The PGID model is priced at C$279.99, while the Shark variant costs C$299.99. This C$20 difference may seem minimal, but it can influence budget-conscious consumers. Additionally, the PGID model offers features such as a self-emptying station that can store debris for up to 60 days, potentially saving users time and effort in the long run.
Cleaning Technology
The PGID vacuum boasts a dual-brush system designed to simulate manual mopping, ensuring that hard floors are cleaned thoroughly without excessive power consumption. This contrasts with the Shark ION, which features a Tri-Brush System that combines side brushes, channel brushes, and a multi-surface brushroll. While both cleaning technologies are effective, the PGID's approach is particularly beneficial for households with hard floors, as it provides a more advanced scrubbing capability compared to Shark's multi-surface focus.
Navigation and Mapping
In terms of navigation, the PGID uses high-precision LDS Laser Navigation to map your home accurately, planning efficient cleaning paths while supporting up to five floor maps. This means it can adapt to complex multi-level homes with ease. Conversely, the Shark ION Robot uses sensors to avoid ledges and stairs and can navigate around furniture. While both robots are equipped to handle obstacles, the PGID's mapping technology offers a more systematic cleaning process, ensuring that no spot is missed in your home.
Runtime and Charging
The Shark ION Robot has a runtime of up to 120 minutes, allowing it to clean larger areas without needing a recharge. The PGID model, while not specifying a runtime, compensates with its self-emptying capability and automatic return to the base for recharging. Users may find that the PGID's hands-free approach, with 60 days of debris storage, reduces the frequency of manual intervention, making it a more convenient option for busy households, even if the runtime isn’t explicitly stated.
Smart Features
Both the PGID and Shark ION offer smart features that enhance user convenience. The PGID can be controlled via a smartphone app, enabling customized cleaning schedules, no-go zones, and water flow adjustments. In contrast, the Shark ION includes easy voice control through Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant, allowing users to command the robot verbally. While both models embrace modern technology, the PGID offers more tailored cleaning options through its app, catering to specific user preferences.
Maintenance and Upkeep
Maintenance is a critical aspect for any robotic vacuum owner. The PGID's self-emptying station holds up to 60 days of debris, significantly reducing the frequency of maintenance tasks. On the other hand, the Shark ION features a .45-quart dust cup, which requires more regular emptying compared to the PGID’s larger capacity. This substantial difference in upkeep may appeal to those who prefer a more hands-off cleaning experience.
Design and Aesthetics
Design can also play a role in consumer choice. The PGID has a sleek, modern appearance that fits well with contemporary home décor, while also being functional with its self-emptying station. The Shark ION, though compact and user-friendly, may not offer the same aesthetic appeal for those prioritizing design. The visual presence of cleaning devices in living spaces can influence buyer preferences, especially in homes where appearance matters.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the PGID Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo and the Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 depends on your specific cleaning needs and lifestyle. If you value advanced cleaning technology, automation, and less frequent maintenance, the PGID may be the better option at C$279.99. However, if you prefer a robot with a longer runtime and voice control capabilities, the Shark ION at C$299.99 could suit your requirements. Both products offer unique benefits, so consider your priorities before making a decision.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

