Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum - Easy to use vs Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 with Wi-Fi Voice Control .45-Quart Dust Cup Capacit

Cleaning Power and Effectiveness

The Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum offers 70 times more power-lifting suction compared to the Roomba 600 series, promising a deep clean with its 3-stage system. In contrast, the Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 features a Tri-Brush System combining side brushes, channel brushes, and a multi-surface brushroll to tackle debris on various surfaces. While the Roomba highlights suction strength as its main cleaning advantage, the Shark focuses on versatile brush types for capturing dirt.

Roomba’s 3-stage cleaning includes a Multi-Surface brush and Edge-Sweeping brush designed to devour dirt and dust bunnies, aiming for a "barefoot clean" floor. Meanwhile, Shark's brush system is engineered to handle debris comprehensively across floor types. Overall, Roomba 105’s suction power suggests a more aggressive dirt removal, while Shark ION’s brush variety aims for adaptability. The Roomba’s suction advantage may appeal to users prioritizing deep cleaning performance.

Navigation and Mapping Technology

When it comes to navigation, the Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum uses ClearView LiDAR technology that maps your home quickly, avoids obstacles, and cleans in neat rows—even in the dark. This super-smart mapping allows for efficient coverage. The Shark ION Robot Vacuum senses ledges and stairs, avoids damaging furniture and walls, and manoeuvres around potential stuck situations, showing an awareness of its surroundings.

Roomba’s LiDAR mapping provides a detailed approach to cleaning by systematically covering floors, while Shark’s system emphasizes obstacle avoidance and safety. Neither product description specifies whether Shark uses a mapping system as advanced as LiDAR, but Roomba’s detailed mapping likely contributes to a more structured cleaning path. For users wanting precise navigation, Roomba 105’s ClearView LiDAR stands out.

Customisation and Scheduling Features

The Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum excels in customisation, allowing users to schedule and target specific rooms based on daily routines, adjust cleaning passes, and modify suction power levels. Users can also skip rooms actively used or needing no cleaning. These features are accessible through the easy-to-use Roomba Home app, which supports time estimates, filter life checks, and keep-out zones.

By comparison, the Shark ION Robot Vacuum’s SharkClean app lets users start, stop, and schedule cleaning sessions, but it does not explicitly mention targeted room cleaning or suction adjustments. While Shark supports app-based scheduling, Roomba offers more granular control over cleaning tasks. For those who want tailored cleaning patterns and room-specific schedules, the Roomba 105 provides a more flexible experience.

Voice Control and App Integration

Both robot vacuums support voice commands and app controls, but there are some differences. The Roomba 105 can be controlled via voice assistants including Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant-enabled devices. It also offers three easy ways to control: voice, app, or robot buttons. This versatility makes it accessible to a wide range of users.

Shark ION also supports voice commands through Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant, but Siri integration is not mentioned. The SharkClean app provides remote control and scheduling but does not specify additional control methods. Roomba’s compatibility with multiple voice assistants and control options suggests a broader ecosystem integration, making it slightly more convenient for users invested in smart home platforms.

Battery Life and Runtime

The Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 boasts up to 120 minutes of runtime, enabling whole-home cleaning that can cover multiple floor types, including carpets. This extended runtime is a significant advantage for larger homes or longer cleaning cycles.

The Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum’s battery life is not directly specified, but it does offer a recharge-and-resume feature, sending itself back to recharge when needed and continuing cleaning where it left off. This function ensures efficient cleaning sessions even if the battery doesn’t last through the entire job. While Shark’s runtime is explicitly longer, Roomba’s smart recharge capability compensates for shorter battery life by maintaining cleaning continuity.

Design and Aesthetics

The Roomba 105 is described as having a sleek look inspired by modern design, with finishes and textures that blend easily with home décor. This suggests an emphasis on style as well as function, making it a subtle addition to living spaces.

Shark’s design details are not specifically highlighted, with a focus instead on performance features. While Shark prioritizes cleaning technology and runtime, Roomba places some importance on appearance, which could be a consideration for style-conscious buyers. The Roomba 105’s modern aesthetics may better complement home interiors.

Price and Value

Priced at C$199.99, the Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum is positioned as a budget-friendly option with advanced suction and smart mapping features. The Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 comes in at C$299.99, making it C$100 more expensive but offering a longer runtime and versatile brush system.

Given the price difference, Roomba 105 offers strong suction power, smart navigation, and customisation at a lower cost, while Shark provides longer battery life and a comprehensive brush system for a premium. Buyers must decide whether the additional runtime and brush variety justify the higher price or if Roomba’s cleaning power and smart features deliver better value.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum and the Shark ION Robot Vacuum AV752 depends on your priorities. If you want powerful suction with 70 times more power-lifting capability, detailed LiDAR mapping, extensive customisation options, and broad voice assistant compatibility—all at a lower price of C$199.99—the Roomba 105 stands out. Its ability to schedule targeted room cleaning and resume after recharging adds convenience for busy households.

On the other hand, if you require up to 120 minutes of runtime to cover larger areas in one go and prefer a robot equipped with a three-brush system designed for versatile cleaning, the Shark ION at C$299.99 might be the better fit. Its obstacle avoidance and integrated home sensing also provide peace of mind in varied home environments.

Ultimately, for users seeking deep cleaning power and navigational precision at a budget-friendly price, the Roomba 105 is the recommended choice. For those valuing longer runtime and brush versatility, Shark ION offers features worth the premium.