Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum - Easy to use vs Shark RV754CA ION Robot Vacuum
Updated August 2026 — The Roomba 105 offers superior suction power and advanced mapping technology, making it the better choice for most users. However, the Shark RV754CA provides longer battery life for extensive cleaning.
The Roomba 105 offers superior suction power and advanced mapping technology, making it the better choice for most users. However, the Shark RV754CA provides longer battery life for extensive cleaning.
Why Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum - Easy to use is better
Price
Roomba 105 is C$199.99, cheaper than Shark RV754CA at C$268.98.
Suction Power
Roomba 105 has 70X more power-lifting suction compared to the Roomba 600 series.
Mapping Tech
Roomba 105 uses ClearView LiDAR for advanced mapping and navigation.
Why Shark RV754CA ION Robot Vacuum is better
Battery Life
Shark RV754CA has a runtime of up to 120 minutes.
Brush System
Shark RV754CA features a Tri-Brush System for versatile cleaning.
Voice Control
Both support voice control, but Shark's app is more straightforward.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum - Easy to use | Shark RV754CA ION Robot Vacuum |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | iRobot | Shark |
| Control App | Roomba Home App | SharkClean App |
| Voice Assistants | Alexa, Siri, Google | Alexa, Google |
| Recharge | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 3.2 kg | 3.5 kg |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum is more budget-friendly at C$199.99, while the Shark RV754CA ION Robot Vacuum is priced at C$268.98. This represents a difference of C$68.99, making the Roomba the more affordable option for consumers looking to invest in a robotic vacuum. The significant price gap may influence buyers who are price-sensitive or those who are purchasing their first robotic vacuum and prefer to keep costs lower without sacrificing quality.
Cleaning Performance
The Roomba 105 boasts a powerful suction capability, described as having 70 times more power-lifting suction compared to the Roomba 600 series. Its 3-Stage Cleaning system incorporates a Multi-Surface brush and an Edge-Sweeping brush, ensuring comprehensive dirt and dust removal. On the other hand, the Shark RV754CA features a Tri-Brush System that combines side brushes, channel brushes, and a multi-surface brushroll, designed to tackle debris on various surfaces effectively. Both models aim to deliver excellent cleaning performance, but the Roomba's superior suction power may provide deeper cleaning, especially in homes with heavy dirt accumulation.
Navigation and Mapping
The Roomba 105 sets itself apart with its ClearView LiDAR technology, which quickly maps the home and navigates around obstacles, even in the dark. This level of smart mapping allows for efficient cleaning paths. Conversely, the Shark RV754CA is equipped with sensors that detect ledges and stairs, enabling it to avoid damage to furniture and walls, although it lacks the same advanced mapping technology. Therefore, if precise navigation and systematic cleaning are priorities, the Roomba 105 appears to have the edge in this category.
Control Options
In terms of controlling the devices, both the Roomba 105 and Shark RV754CA offer modern conveniences. The Roomba can be controlled through the Roomba Home App, voice commands via Alexa, Siri, or Google Assistant, and the physical buttons on the device. Meanwhile, the Shark RV754CA also features remote control capabilities through the SharkClean app and voice control through Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant. While both vacuums embrace smart technology, the Roomba's multiple control methods allow for more versatility in user interaction.
Battery Life and Efficiency
The Roomba 105 is designed to recharge itself when needed and resumes cleaning from where it left off, enhancing its cleaning efficiency. The Shark RV754CA, on the other hand, boasts a runtime of up to 120 minutes, allowing for more extensive cleaning in a single charge. While the Roomba does not specify its runtime, its self-recharging feature optimizes cleaning tasks. For those who require prolonged cleaning sessions without interruptions, the Shark RV754CA may be the better choice.
Design and Aesthetics
Aesthetically, the Roomba 105 is designed to blend beautifully with modern home décor, featuring sleek finishes and textures. The design is not just about looks; it also contributes to its functionality. The Shark RV754CA is designed to integrate seamlessly into the home environment, avoiding damage to furniture and walls. While both products are visually appealing, the Roomba 105's emphasis on aesthetic integration may appeal more to design-conscious users.
Smart Features
The Roomba 105 offers fully custom cleaning options, allowing users to schedule cleanings and target specific rooms based on their routines. It also features extra dirt-spot cleaning, which focuses on specific areas needing more attention. The Shark RV754CA provides similar smart features through its app, allowing scheduling and remote operation. However, the Roomba's more tailored cleaning options may provide a higher degree of personalization for users looking to optimise their home cleaning.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Roomba 105 Vac Robot Vacuum and the Shark RV754CA ION Robot Vacuum largely depends on your priorities as a consumer. If budget and advanced mapping technology are your primary concerns, the Roomba 105 at C$199.99 is the more compelling choice. Its powerful suction and ability to recharge and resume cleaning enhance its efficiency. However, if you require a longer battery life for extensive cleaning and appreciate a robust cleaning system with mixed brush types, the Shark RV754CA, priced at C$268.98, could be the right fit. Ultimately, both robotic vacuums offer excellent cleaning capabilities, but your specific needs will dictate which one is the better purchase for your home.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

