Shark Matrix Plus 2in1 Robot Vacuum & Mop with Sonic Mopping vs iRobot Braava Jet M6
Updated August 2026 — The Shark Matrix Plus offers superior versatility and advanced features, making it the better choice for comprehensive cleaning. However, the iRobot Braava Jet M6 is a more budget-friendly option for those focused solely on mopping.
The Shark Matrix Plus offers superior versatility and advanced features, making it the better choice for comprehensive cleaning. However, the iRobot Braava Jet M6 is a more budget-friendly option for those focused solely on mopping.
Why Shark Matrix Plus 2in1 Robot Vacuum & Mop with Sonic Mopping is better
Price
Shark Matrix Plus is more feature-rich despite being pricier.
Functionality
Shark Matrix Plus vacuums and mops, while Braava Jet M6 only mops.
Filtration
Shark Matrix Plus has a True HEPA filtration system.
Why iRobot Braava Jet M6 is better
Cost
iRobot Braava Jet M6 is more budget-friendly.
Mopping Focus
Braava Jet M6 specializes in mopping with advanced features.
Smart Mapping
Braava Jet M6 offers extensive control through Smart Mapping.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Shark Matrix Plus 2in1 Robot Vacuum & Mop with Sonic Mopping | iRobot Braava Jet M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Shark | iRobot |
| Vacuuming | Yes | No |
| Mopping | Yes | Yes |
| Smart Features | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA Filter | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Shark Matrix Plus 2in1 Robot Vacuum & Mop is priced at C$899.99, while the iRobot Braava Jet M6 is more budget-friendly at C$599.99. This significant C$300 difference may influence your decision, particularly if you're looking for a more economical option. While both products offer advanced cleaning capabilities, the cost disparity could make the iRobot more appealing for those who want effective cleaning without breaking the bank.
Cleaning Versatility
The Shark Matrix Plus is a versatile 2in1 device that functions as both a vacuum and a mop, boasting incredible suction power and sonic mopping capabilities. It excels in cleaning carpets and hard floors simultaneously, making it a great option for those who require comprehensive home cleaning. In contrast, the iRobot Braava Jet M6 is solely focused on mopping, using Precision Jet Spray to tackle sticky messes effectively. While the Braava Jet is highly efficient for hard floor cleaning, its lack of vacuuming functionality may limit its appeal for users who desire a complete cleaning solution.
Navigation Technology
Both the Shark Matrix Plus and the iRobot Braava Jet M6 employ advanced navigation technologies to enhance their cleaning efficiency. The Shark features Matrix Clean, which uses a precision matrix grid to ensure that no spots are missed and delivers 30% better carpet cleaning compared to its predecessor. Meanwhile, the Braava Jet M6 utilises vSLAM navigation, allowing it to learn the layout of your home and create Smart Maps for efficient cleaning. This means that while the Shark focuses on thoroughness in cleaning, the iRobot excels in navigating around objects and under furniture, making it ideal for larger spaces.
Edge and Corner Cleaning
The Shark Matrix Plus is designed with CleanEdge Detect technology, which provides 50% better edge cleaning compared to previous models. This feature enhances its ability to tackle dirt and debris located at edges and corners, ensuring a more comprehensive clean. On the other hand, the Braava Jet M6 does not specifically mention edge cleaning capabilities, focusing instead on precision mopping. For those who prioritise edge and corner cleaning, the Shark Matrix Plus may have the upper hand.
Smart Features
Smart features play a crucial role in modern robotic cleaning devices. The Shark Matrix Plus offers Recharge & Resume functionality, allowing it to automatically recharge and continue cleaning where it left off. This is particularly useful for larger homes that may require more cleaning time. Conversely, the Braava Jet M6 provides extensive control through Smart Mapping, allowing users to schedule cleaning times and designate Keep Out Zones. While both products offer smart features, the Shark's self-emptying capability and automatic charging make it an attractive option for users who prefer minimal maintenance.
Filtration and Allergen Control
The Shark Matrix Plus includes a True HEPA filtration system, which captures and traps 99.97% of dust and allergens down to 0.3 microns. This is a significant advantage for allergy sufferers, as it ensures cleaner air quality in your home. The iRobot Braava Jet M6 does not specifically mention allergen filtration, focusing more on its mopping capabilities. For households where air quality and allergen control are priorities, the Shark Matrix Plus stands out due to its superior filtration system.
Cleaning Performance
In terms of overall cleaning performance, the Shark Matrix Plus excels with its dual function of vacuuming and mopping. It can clean carpets and hard floors simultaneously, making it particularly efficient in homes with varied flooring types. The Braava Jet M6, while specialised in mopping, is also designed to clean finished hard floors effectively. However, it lacks the vacuuming capability, which may limit its performance in homes that require a thorough clean across different surfaces.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Shark Matrix Plus 2in1 Robot Vacuum & Mop and the iRobot Braava Jet M6 ultimately depends on your specific cleaning needs and preferences. If you require a comprehensive cleaning solution that combines both vacuuming and mopping with advanced features, the Shark Matrix Plus at C$899.99 may be the better option. However, if your focus is primarily on mopping and you want a more budget-friendly option, the iRobot Braava Jet M6 at C$599.99 offers excellent performance for hard floors. Consider your home’s layout, flooring types, and cleaning priorities to make the best choice for your cleaning needs.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

