Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket vs Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3 Liquid CPU Cooler
Updated August 2026 — The Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3 excels in cooling performance and features, while the Thermaltake Gravity i3 is a budget-friendly option for basic needs.
The Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3 excels in cooling performance and features, while the Thermaltake Gravity i3 is a budget-friendly option for basic needs.
Why Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket is better
price
Gravity i3 costs C$20.90, significantly cheaper than Aqua Elite's C$91.70.
size
Gravity i3 has a low-profile design, suitable for compact builds.
noise
Gravity i3 operates at a quieter 21.3 decibels.
Why Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3 Liquid CPU Cooler is better
cooling
Aqua Elite has superior airflow of 66.17 CFM compared to 31.343 CFM.
features
Aqua Elite includes ARGB lighting and advanced pump design.
installation
Aqua Elite supports a wider range of CPU sockets.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket | Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3 Liquid CPU Cooler |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Thermaltake | Thermalright |
| Price | C$20.90 | C$91.70 |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA 1700 | LGA 1150/1151/1155/1156/1200/2011/2066/1700/AM4/AM5 |
| Cooling Type | Air | Liquid |
| Fan Speed | N/A | 1500 RPM |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Thermaltake Gravity i3 is significantly more affordable than the Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3. Priced at C$20.90, the Gravity i3 is a budget-friendly option, while the Aqua Elite comes in at C$91.70, making it more than four times the price of its competitor. This substantial difference in pricing may appeal to users looking for basic cooling solutions without breaking the bank. However, the higher price point of the Aqua Elite suggests that it offers advanced features aimed at performance enthusiasts who require superior cooling capabilities.
Cooling Performance
When it comes to cooling performance, the Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3 is designed for high efficiency, featuring a 360mm radiator and three 120mm fans that deliver an airflow of 66.17 CFM. This makes it suitable for overclocking and demanding applications that generate significant heat. In contrast, the Thermaltake Gravity i3 has a more modest airflow of 31.343 CFM, which may be adequate for general use but likely falls short for high-performance systems. Thus, if cooling performance is a priority, the Aqua Elite stands out as the superior choice.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the Aqua Elite features an octagonal pump head with ARGB lighting, providing a visually striking appearance that syncs with motherboard lighting for a cohesive look. The aesthetic appeal of the Aqua Elite is enhanced by its modern design and customizable lighting options. On the other hand, the Gravity i3 has a low-profile design with a height of 2.58 inches, making it suitable for compact builds. While it lacks advanced lighting features, its straightforward design may appeal to those who prefer a more subtle approach.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are an essential consideration for many users. The Thermaltake Gravity i3 operates at a noise level of 21.3 decibels, making it a quiet choice for users who prioritise a peaceful computing environment. The Aqua Elite, while equipped with powerful fans, operates at a maximum noise level of 23 dBA, slightly louder than the Gravity i3. The difference in noise levels may not be significant for everyone, but users sensitive to sound may prefer the quieter operation of the Gravity i3.
Installation Process
Both coolers are designed with user-friendly installation in mind. The Gravity i3 offers a quick and easy installation process, allowing users to set it up without hassle. Meanwhile, the Aqua Elite provides a more comprehensive installation experience, supporting a wide range of CPU sockets, including AMD AM4/AM5 and various Intel sockets. It comes with the necessary accessories for installation, which may be appreciated by users building or upgrading their systems. In this category, both products cater to different user experiences, with the Gravity i3 being simpler and the Aqua Elite offering broader compatibility.
Warranty and Support
The Thermaltake Gravity i3 comes with a two-year warranty, which is standard for budget-friendly coolers. This warranty period provides peace of mind for users investing in a lower-priced product. In contrast, the warranty details for the Aqua Elite are not specified in the provided data. However, given its premium positioning in the market, it may offer a longer warranty period. Users looking for long-term reliability may want to consider the warranty options when choosing between these two products.
Target Audience
The Thermaltake Gravity i3 is aimed at budget-conscious consumers or those who require basic cooling for their systems. Its low price and compact design make it ideal for everyday use, such as office computers or casual gaming rigs. Conversely, the Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3 targets performance enthusiasts who demand superior cooling solutions for high-end gaming or workstation builds. Its advanced features, higher price, and impressive cooling capabilities make it a better fit for users who push their systems to the limits.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Thermaltake Gravity i3 and the Thermalright Aqua Elite 360 V3 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for an economical cooling solution for standard usage, the Gravity i3 is an excellent choice, offering quiet operation and easy installation at a very low price. However, if you require superior cooling performance for high-demand tasks or overclocking, the Aqua Elite is worth the investment, providing advanced features and impressive airflow. Evaluate your priorities, whether they lean towards budget-friendly simplicity or high-performance capability, to make the best choice for your system.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

