Thermaltake TR100 SFF Chassis; mITX Support; 18.9 Liters; PCIe 4.0 Riser Cable I vs Antec Flux M
Updated August 2026 — The Thermaltake TR100 is ideal for portability and compact builds, while the Antec Flux M excels in cooling performance and affordability.
The Thermaltake TR100 is ideal for portability and compact builds, while the Antec Flux M excels in cooling performance and affordability.
Why Thermaltake TR100 SFF Chassis; mITX Support; 18.9 Liters; PCIe 4.0 Riser Cable I is better
Compact Design
The TR100 is specifically designed for small form factor builds.
Lightweight
The TR100 is more portable due to its smaller size.
Easy GPU Install
The TR100 features a removable PCIe bracket for straightforward GPU installation.
Why Antec Flux M is better
Cooling Performance
The Flux M supports a larger 360mm radiator for better cooling.
Price
The Flux M is significantly more affordable at C$86.00.
Airflow Design
The Flux M has a mesh front panel for superior airflow.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Thermaltake TR100 SFF Chassis; mITX Support; 18.9 Liters; PCIe 4.0 Riser Cable I | Antec Flux M |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Thermaltake | Antec |
| Current Price | C$207.54 | C$86.00 |
| Form Factor | mITX | Mini-Tower |
| Pre-installed Fans | None | 6 |
| PCIe Slots | 1 | 5 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Thermaltake TR100 SFF Chassis and Antec Flux M
The Thermaltake TR100 SFF Chassis and the Antec Flux M are two distinct computer cases catering to different needs. The TR100 is a compact, portable chassis designed for small form factor builds, while the Flux M focuses on high-performance cooling and airflow in a mini-tower design. Priced at C$207.54, the TR100 offers unique features for mITX builds, whereas the Antec Flux M is significantly more affordable at C$86.00, emphasizing efficient heat dissipation.
Design and Build Quality
The design of the Thermaltake TR100 is compact and portable, making it ideal for users with limited space or those who travel frequently with their PC. With a volume of just 18.9 liters, it is engineered specifically for mITX builds, offering a dual chamber design that maximizes component placement options. Conversely, the Antec Flux M sports a mini-tower form factor that supports larger builds and features a large mesh front panel. This design allows for exceptional airflow, facilitating heat management effectively.
Cooling Performance
Cooling capabilities are a primary focus for both cases but are approached differently. The Thermaltake TR100 supports a radiator size of up to 280mm, which is adequate for effective cooling in a compact space. In contrast, the Antec Flux M excels with support for a 360mm radiator at the top, alongside an impressive setup of pre-installed fans, including two 120mm ARGB PWM fans at the front and three 120mm PWM reverse fans at the bottom. This design promotes optimal vertical airflow, making it more suitable for users prioritizing cooling performance.
Component Compatibility
When it comes to compatibility, the Thermaltake TR100 is specifically tailored for mITX components, providing a GPU clearance of 360mm and a CPU cooler clearance of 68mm. This makes it suitable for modern graphics cards and cooling solutions, albeit within a compact framework. The Antec Flux M, on the other hand, offers more flexibility for various component configurations with five reusable PCIe slots and ample cable management space of up to 59mm at the front. This allows for cleaner builds and easier installation of components, appealing to users looking for versatility.
Portability
Portability is a standout feature of the Thermaltake TR100. Its small footprint and lightweight design make it an excellent choice for individuals who need to transport their PC frequently. The inclusion of magnetic side panels also facilitates easy access to components, further enhancing its travel-friendly nature. On the other hand, the Antec Flux M, while more substantial in size, is still manageable for users who may need to move their setup occasionally. However, it is less optimized for travel compared to the highly portable TR100.
Ease of Assembly
Both cases offer different experiences in terms of assembly. The Thermaltake TR100 includes a removable PCIe bracket, which simplifies the installation of GPUs, and the magnetic side panels allow for quick teardown and access to internal components. This thoughtful design caters to users who may frequently assemble and disassemble their builds. In contrast, the Antec Flux M provides a more traditional assembly experience but is supported by its generous cable management space, which aids in creating cleaner and more organized builds.
Aesthetics
Aesthetic appeal can influence a buyer's decision, and both the Thermaltake TR100 and Antec Flux M have distinct looks. The TR100 features a sleek, minimalist design that emphasizes its compactness and portability, making it visually appealing for users who prefer understated elegance. The Antec Flux M, however, leans towards a more aggressive look with its mesh front panel and RGB fans, catering to gamers and PC enthusiasts who want a visually striking setup. The choice between them will largely depend on personal style preferences.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Thermaltake TR100 SFF Chassis and the Antec Flux M boils down to specific needs. If portability and compactness are your top priorities, the TR100, priced at C$207.54, stands out with its thoughtful design tailored for small form factor builds. However, if you are looking for superior cooling performance and flexibility in component compatibility at a more budget-friendly price of C$86.00, the Antec Flux M is the better option. Each case has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of users, whether you are a frequent traveler or a gaming enthusiast seeking high performance.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

