Waveshare Active Cooler vs Thermalright AXP120-X67 Black ARGB Low Profile CPU Air Cooler with Quite 120mm T
Updated August 2026 — The Thermalright AXP120-X67 is the superior choice for high-performance cooling, while the Waveshare Active Cooler is a budget-friendly option for Raspberry Pi users.
The Thermalright AXP120-X67 is the superior choice for high-performance cooling, while the Waveshare Active Cooler is a budget-friendly option for Raspberry Pi users.
Why Waveshare Active Cooler is better
price
Waveshare is significantly cheaper at C$15.99.
design
Compact design tailored for Raspberry Pi 5.
targeted use
Specifically designed for Raspberry Pi users.
Why Thermalright AXP120-X67 Black ARGB Low Profile CPU Air Cooler with Quite 120mm T is better
performance
AXP120-X67 has a maximum airflow of 59 CFM.
compatibility
Supports a wide range of Intel and AMD CPUs.
build quality
Constructed with aluminum fins and copper base.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Waveshare Active Cooler | Thermalright AXP120-X67 Black ARGB Low Profile CPU Air Cooler with Quite 120mm T |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | C$15.99 | C$38.79 |
| Max RPM | 8000 | 1800 |
| Airflow | 1.39 CFM | 59 CFM |
| Noise Level | N/A | ≤26.1 dB(A) |
| Material | Aluminium | Aluminium & Copper |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Waveshare Active Cooler
The Waveshare Active Cooler is an affordable option priced at C$15.99, designed specifically for the Raspberry Pi 5. It features a compact design and operates at a maximum speed of 8000±10% RPM, delivering an airflow of 1.39 CFM. This cooler utilises anodised aluminium for its construction, ensuring durability and effective heat dissipation. The inclusion of pulse width modulation control with a tachometer allows for improved performance monitoring. This cooler is ideal for users looking to enhance their Raspberry Pi's thermal management without a hefty investment.
Overview of the Thermalright AXP120-X67 Black ARGB
In contrast, the Thermalright AXP120-X67 Black ARGB is a more premium product priced at C$38.79. This low-profile CPU air cooler measures 123.5mm in length, 120mm in width, and 67mm in height, making it a compact choice for various builds. It features a 120mm PWM fan that operates at up to 1800 RPM, providing a maximum airflow of 59 CFM while maintaining a noise level of ≤26.1 dB(A). The cooler's construction includes a combination of aluminum fins on a copper base and six heat pipes, ensuring effective heat transfer and cooling efficiency for both Intel and AMD platforms.
Performance Comparison
When it comes to performance, the Thermalright AXP120-X67 outshines the Waveshare Active Cooler significantly. The Thermalright model delivers a maximum airflow of 59 CFM, which is substantially higher than the 1.39 CFM produced by the Waveshare cooler. The AXP120-X67's fan speed of 1800 RPM also contributes to its superior cooling capabilities, compared to the Waveshare’s 8000 RPM. This difference in airflow and cooling efficiency makes the Thermalright a more suitable choice for demanding CPU cooling needs, particularly in high-performance systems.
Design and Build Quality
The Waveshare Active Cooler features a simple yet effective design with anodised aluminium for durability. It is specifically tailored for the Raspberry Pi 5, making it a practical option for hobbyists and makers. In comparison, the Thermalright AXP120-X67 boasts a more robust build with its aluminium fins and copper base, combined with six heat pipes that enhance heat transfer. The low-profile design of the AXP120-X67 allows it to fit in a variety of cases, making it a versatile option for different setups. Overall, while both products are well-built, the Thermalright's quality and design cater to more demanding applications.
Noise Levels
Noise level is an essential factor for many users when selecting a CPU cooler. The Waveshare Active Cooler operates silently, but specific noise levels are not provided. On the other hand, the Thermalright AXP120-X67 maintains a noise level of ≤26.1 dB(A), which is relatively quiet for a cooler of its performance capability. Users who prioritise a silent operation may find the Waveshare appealing; however, the Thermalright offers a balance of performance and quiet operation, making it suitable for both gaming and professional environments.
Compatibility
The Waveshare Active Cooler is specially designed for the Raspberry Pi 5, making it a targeted solution for users of this single-board computer. In contrast, the Thermalright AXP120-X67 provides broader compatibility, supporting various Intel and AMD CPUs, including the latest socket types. This versatility makes the Thermalright a more suitable choice for users building or upgrading their PCs, as it can adapt to a range of systems, whereas the Waveshare is limited to the Raspberry Pi ecosystem.
Price Consideration
Price is a crucial factor when comparing these two coolers. The Waveshare Active Cooler is priced at C$15.99, making it an economical choice for those on a budget or those who need a simple cooling solution for their Raspberry Pi. Meanwhile, the Thermalright AXP120-X67 is priced higher at C$38.79, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities. While the price difference is significant, the added performance and versatility of the Thermalright may justify the investment for users requiring a high-performance cooling solution.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Waveshare Active Cooler and the Thermalright AXP120-X67 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you’re looking for an affordable, efficient cooling solution for a Raspberry Pi 5, the Waveshare Active Cooler is a commendable choice. However, if you require a more powerful, versatile cooler for a high-performance CPU in a gaming or professional setup, the Thermalright AXP120-X67 is the clear winner. Its superior airflow, build quality, and compatibility with various CPU platforms make it a worthwhile investment for serious users.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

