Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board vs Official Raspberry Pi Pico Board
Updated August 2026 — The Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board offers superior performance and connectivity for advanced projects, while the Raspberry Pi Pico is a cost-effective, beginner-friendly option for simpler applications.
The Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board offers superior performance and connectivity for advanced projects, while the Raspberry Pi Pico is a cost-effective, beginner-friendly option for simpler applications.
Why Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board is better
Performance
240 MHz dual-core vs 133 MHz dual-core processor
Connectivity
Built-in Ethernet and PoE support vs basic GPIO and no Ethernet
Memory
512KB SRAM and 16MB Flash vs 264KB SRAM and 2MB Flash
Why Official Raspberry Pi Pico Board is better
Price
C$19.96 vs C$42.99
Ease of Use
Drag-and-drop programming vs more complex development
Community Support
Extensive Raspberry Pi ecosystem vs smaller Waveshare user base
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board | Official Raspberry Pi Pico Board |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ESP32-S3R8 dual-core 240 MHz | Arm Cortex-M0+ dual-core 133 MHz |
| SRAM | 512KB | 264KB |
| Flash Memory | 16MB | 2MB |
| Ethernet | W5500 onboard with PoE option | None |
| GPIO Pins | Multiple, Pico header compatible | 26 pins including 3 analog inputs |
| Programming | USB Type-C, multiple interfaces | Drag-and-drop mass storage USB |
| Price | C$42.99 | C$19.96 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
When comparing the Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board and the Official Raspberry Pi Pico Board, it's clear that both products cater to different segments of the microcontroller market. The Waveshare board is priced at C$42.99, while the Raspberry Pi Pico is more budget-friendly at C$19.96. This price difference reflects their varied capabilities and intended use cases.
The Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board features a powerful ESP32-S3R8 chip with a dual-core processor that runs at 240 MHz, making it suitable for more demanding applications. In contrast, the Raspberry Pi Pico utilises a dual-core Arm Cortex-M0+ processor that operates at 133 MHz, which, while adequate for many projects, may not handle as intensive tasks as the Waveshare board.
Performance Comparison
In terms of performance, the Waveshare ESP32-S3 offers superior specifications with its 240 MHz processor, compared to the 133 MHz of the Raspberry Pi Pico. This higher clock speed allows the Waveshare board to handle more complex calculations and processes, making it ideal for applications requiring higher computational power.
Additionally, the Waveshare board comes equipped with 512KB SRAM and 16MB Flash memory, significantly outperforming the Raspberry Pi Pico's 264KB SRAM and 2MB on-board QSPI Flash. This enhancement in memory capacity allows for more extensive data handling and storage, which is crucial for memory-intensive applications like image processing.
Connectivity Features
Connectivity is another area where the Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board excels. It integrates a W5500 Ethernet chip, enabling a 10/100Mbps network connection, which is essential for projects requiring stable internet connections. Furthermore, the board supports Power over Ethernet (PoE) through an optional module, providing both power and data over a single cable.
On the other hand, the Raspberry Pi Pico offers basic connectivity with its 26 GPIO pins and supports communication protocols like UART, SPI, and I2C. However, it lacks built-in Ethernet capabilities and advanced wireless features. While the Pico is suitable for simpler projects, the Waveshare board stands out for more connected, IoT-focused applications.
Memory and Storage
The memory architecture of both boards is significantly different and impacts their usability. The Waveshare ESP32-S3 features a robust combination of 512KB SRAM and 16MB Flash memory, allowing developers to store larger programs and handle more data simultaneously. This extensive memory is beneficial for applications involving video capture and image processing, where larger datasets are common.
Conversely, the Raspberry Pi Pico, with its 264KB SRAM and 2MB Flash, is best suited for simpler applications where memory demands are lower. While this may suffice for basic tasks, developers looking to implement more complex functionalities may find the Pico's memory limiting, especially when compared to the more capable Waveshare board.
Development and Usability
Both boards provide unique development experiences tailored to their respective target audiences. The Waveshare ESP32-S3 Development Board features an onboard USB Type-C port for easy power supply and program downloading, which simplifies the development process. Its compatibility with multiple peripheral interfaces and the Pico header further enhances its expandability for various projects.
In contrast, the Raspberry Pi Pico excels in its straightforward programming approach with drag-and-drop functionality using mass storage over USB. This user-friendly feature can significantly benefit beginners or those who prefer a simpler workflow. However, the overall development experience may be more limited compared to the versatility offered by the Waveshare board.
Target Audience and Applications
The ideal audience for each board varies significantly based on their capabilities. The Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board is designed for developers needing robust performance for IoT applications, particularly those involving network connectivity, image processing, or other resource-intensive tasks. Its high price point reflects its advanced features, making it suitable for professionals and hobbyists willing to invest in a powerful tool.
On the other hand, the Official Raspberry Pi Pico Board targets beginners and educators who require an accessible entry into microcontroller programming. Its lower cost and ease of use make it a popular choice for simple projects, educational purposes, and rapid prototyping without the need for extensive resources.
Community and Support
Both products benefit from strong community support, although the nature of that support varies. The Raspberry Pi Pico, being part of the Raspberry Pi ecosystem, enjoys extensive documentation and a thriving community of users and developers. This can be particularly beneficial for newcomers looking for tutorials and assistance.
Conversely, the Waveshare ESP32-S3 also has a dedicated user base, but the resources may not be as extensive as those available for the Raspberry Pi Pico. Nevertheless, Waveshare provides documentation and support for their products, catering to a more specialized audience with specific project needs.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Waveshare ESP32-S3 ETH Development Board and the Official Raspberry Pi Pico Board largely depends on your project requirements and budget. If you need a powerful development board with advanced connectivity features and higher performance for demanding applications, the Waveshare board at C$42.99 is the better choice. However, if you're looking for a cost-effective solution for simpler projects or educational purposes, the Raspberry Pi Pico at C$19.96 is an excellent option. Ultimately, both boards have their strengths, making them suitable for different user needs and scenarios.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon.ca Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

