AIRTOK Air Purifiers vs Aircillin Air Purifier AP070B

Price Comparison

Airtok Air Purifiers is about 7% cheaper than Aircillin Air Purifier AP070B at current pricing. While Airtok is priced at £36.99, Aircillin costs £39.99, making the difference £3.00. Over the past 30 days, both products have maintained a consistent price of £39.99 for Aircillin, while Airtok has seen a slight dip from £39.99 to its current £36.99 — suggesting better value on offer. Airtok’s average price over the last 90 days sits at £40.67, which is higher than its current listing, indicating a recent discount. For budget-conscious buyers, Airtok offers a more attractive entry point without sacrificing core functionality.

Filtration Efficiency

Both Airtok Air Purifiers and Aircillin Air Purifier AP070B feature a 4-stage H13 HEPA filter system capable of capturing particles as small as 0.1 microns. Airtok claims to remove 99.97% of airborne contaminants like dust, smoke, pollen, and odor, while Aircillin asserts a slightly stronger 99.99% removal rate for particles down to 0.1 microns. The filtration layers are similar: pre-filter, nano fabric, HEPA, and activated carbon. However, Aircillin specifies that its HEPA filter captures 99.99% of particles, a marginal but measurable improvement in filtration efficacy. This suggests Aircillin may offer marginally superior air cleaning performance, particularly for allergy sufferers or those sensitive to microscopic irritants.

Noise Levels and Sleep Mode

Aircillin Air Purifier AP070B operates at a quieter 23 dB in sleep mode, compared to Airtok’s 25 dB at the lowest fan speed. This 2 dB difference may be imperceptible to most users, but it places Aircillin ahead in ultra-quiet operation. Both models allow users to disable the internal night light entirely, with Aircillin offering brightness control (full, 50%, off), while Airtok only allows turning the light off completely. Aircillin’s lower noise level and adjustable LED settings make it slightly better suited for those who prioritise absolute silence during sleep, especially in shared or sensitive environments.

Energy Consumption

Aircillin Air Purifier AP070B consumes just 6W of power, significantly less than Airtok’s 0.01 kWh per hour on highest speed. Though Airtok claims “only consume 0.01 kWh” on high, this equates to 10W — a 67% increase over Aircillin’s rated 6W. Over time, this difference translates into meaningful energy savings. At typical usage, Aircillin uses half the electricity of Airtok when operating at maximum capacity. For eco-conscious users or those aiming to reduce long-term electricity costs, Aircillin presents a clear advantage in energy efficiency, despite both being low-power devices.

Room Coverage and Air Circulation

Aircillin Air Purifier AP070B is designed for spaces up to 765 square feet, with a stated ability to clean such an area in one hour. In contrast, Airtok does not specify room size coverage. However, both models use a 360° air intake design to enhance circulation. Aircillin highlights faster purification — claiming a 153 sq ft room can be cleaned in just 12 minutes — which implies superior airflow dynamics. Without official coverage figures, Airtok lacks comparable performance benchmarks. For larger rooms or open-plan living areas, Aircillin’s defined coverage range gives it a practical edge, particularly for users seeking a scalable solution.

Feature Controls and Usability

Airtok offers three fan speeds, a 2/4/8 hour timer, and a child lock function, providing basic yet effective controls. Aircillin also features three fan speeds and a timer, but adds a dedicated LED touch screen with brightness adjustment options and a night mode button that toggles between full, 50% brightness, and off. The ability to adjust LED visibility enhances user experience, especially in darkened bedrooms. Additionally, Aircillin includes a filter replacement indicator that flashes when filter life drops below 10%, helping users maintain optimal performance. These refined interface features give Aircillin a usability edge over Airtok’s more straightforward control layout.

Filter Replacement and Maintenance

Both Airtok and Aircillin recommend replacing their filters every 3 to 4 months, though Aircillin extends the upper limit to 6 months under normal conditions. Aircillin’s filter reminder system activates when remaining life is ≤10%, prompting timely replacement. Airtok provides a similar alert via a red indicator when filter service time falls below 10%. Neither product specifies filter lifespan beyond these general ranges. However, Aircillin’s broader maintenance window and automated reminder system suggest greater flexibility and reliability in long-term upkeep. Users seeking hassle-free maintenance will find Aircillin slightly more optimised.

Which should you buy?

Choose Aircillin Air Purifier AP070B if you prioritise quieter operation (23 dB vs 25 dB), lower energy use (6W vs 10W), and enhanced usability with adjustable LEDs and a clearer filter reminder. It also boasts a higher filtration claim (99.99% vs 99.97%) and larger room coverage (up to 765 sq ft). While it costs £3.00 more at £39.99, the performance and efficiency gains justify the premium. Opt for Airtok Air Purifiers only if you seek a lower initial cost (£36.99) and don’t require advanced features like brightness control or extended filter life. For most users, Aircillin delivers better value through superior quietness, efficiency, and smart design.