AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D Processor with 3D V Cache technology vs Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245KF - 14 cores
Updated August 2026 — The AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D offers superior performance and features, making it the better choice for high-demand tasks. However, the Intel Core Ultra 5 is a more budget-friendly option.
The AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D offers superior performance and features, making it the better choice for high-demand tasks. However, the Intel Core Ultra 5 is a more budget-friendly option.
Why AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D Processor with 3D V Cache technology is better
Price
AMD is a premium option with advanced features.
Core Count
AMD has higher thread count for multi-threaded tasks.
Cache Size
AMD has a larger L3 cache for improved performance.
Why Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245KF - 14 cores is better
Price
Intel is significantly cheaper.
Core Count
Intel has more cores for parallel processing.
Power
Intel has specified power consumption.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D Processor with 3D V Cache technology | Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245KF - 14 cores |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Price | £299.49 | £139.99 |
| Cores | 8 | 14 |
| Threads | 16 | 14 |
| Base Clock | 4.2GHz | N/A |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB | N/A |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D Processor is priced at £299.49, whereas the Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245KF is significantly cheaper at £139.99. This price disparity of £159.50 could be a determining factor for budget-conscious buyers. The AMD processor is positioned as a premium option, likely due to its advanced features like 3D V Cache technology, which enhances performance in demanding tasks. In contrast, the Intel processor, while more affordable, still offers considerable capabilities, making it an attractive option for those seeking value without compromising performance.
Core and Thread Count
When it comes to core and thread count, the AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D boasts 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 offers a more impressive 14 cores but only 14 threads. This difference indicates that while the Intel processor can handle more simultaneous tasks, the AMD can better manage multi-threaded applications due to its higher thread count. The choice between these two processors may depend on the specific use case; gamers and content creators may favour the AMD for its better multi-threading capabilities, while users needing raw core count for parallel processing might lean towards the Intel option.
Clock Speed Performance
The AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D features a base clock speed of 4.2GHz, with a maximum boost clock of up to 5.0GHz. In contrast, the Intel Core Ultra 5’s specifications do not include explicit clock speeds in the provided features. However, the Intel series is known for its efficient performance across various workloads. The AMD processor’s boost clock capability suggests it can handle intensive tasks exceptionally well, providing enhanced performance during peaks in demand. Gamers and professionals who require high-speed processing for tasks such as video rendering may find the AMD's superior clock speeds to be more beneficial.
Cache Size
The AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D is equipped with a substantial total L3 cache of 96 MB, alongside an L2 cache of 8 MB. In comparison, the Intel Core Ultra 5 does not specify its cache sizes in the information provided. The larger cache size in the AMD processor suggests improved performance in scenarios requiring rapid data access, such as gaming and heavy computational tasks. For users who prioritise speed and efficiency, the AMD's extensive cache could lead to better performance outcomes, particularly in memory-intensive applications.
Memory Support
The AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D supports DDR5 memory, which is the latest standard for RAM, promising higher speeds and efficiency. Similarly, the Intel Core Ultra 5 also supports DDR5 memory, making both processors future-proof in terms of memory technology. However, details about maximum supported memory speeds or configurations are not provided for either processor. This compatibility with DDR5 indicates that both options are well-suited for high-performance builds, allowing users to benefit from the latest advancements in memory technology.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D is not specified in the provided features, but it is known that the processor operates with a maximum temperature threshold of 89°C. In contrast, the Intel Core Ultra 5 has a base power of 125W. This suggests that while the power consumption for the AMD may be less clear, the Intel processor requires more power, which could lead to higher electricity costs over time. Users concerned about energy efficiency might consider how these power requirements align with their usage patterns and system configurations.
Target Audience
The AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D is likely aimed at gamers and professionals who demand high performance for intensive tasks, as indicated by its robust specifications and higher price point. On the other hand, the Intel Core Ultra 5, with its more affordable price and sufficient capabilities, is geared towards mainstream users who require solid performance for everyday applications and gaming. Consequently, the choice between these two processors may hinge on the user’s specific needs, budget constraints, and the type of tasks they intend to perform.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the AMD Ryzensets 7 7800X3D and the Intel Core Ultra 5 ultimately depends on your budget and performance requirements. If you are looking for higher performance with advanced features and are willing to invest more, the AMD processor is the clear winner, especially for tasks that benefit from its multi-threading and cache advantages. Conversely, if you are after a more economical option that still delivers solid performance for general use or gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 5 presents a compelling choice. Thus, your decision should align with your specific needs, whether they lean towards premium performance or budget-friendly efficiency.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

