vsversusfinder

ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 - AIO CPU Cooler vs Noctua NH-U12S redux

Updated August 2026The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 offers superior cooling performance, while the Noctua NH-U12S redux excels in quiet operation and ease of installation. Choose based on your specific needs.

The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 offers superior cooling performance, while the Noctua NH-U12S redux excels in quiet operation and ease of installation. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 - AIO CPU Cooler is better

Cooling Performance

Liquid cooling design allows for better heat dissipation under heavy loads.

Integrated Features

Includes integrated VRM fan for improved performance.

Price

More budget-friendly option at £56.49.

Why Noctua NH-U12S redux is better

Noise Levels

Operates near silently at idle.

Installation

Simplified installation with SecuFirm2 mounting system.

Brand Reputation

Noctua is known for its commitment to low noise and reliability.

Overall score

ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 - AIO CPU Cooler
85
Noctua NH-U12S redux
78

Specifications

SpecARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 - AIO CPU CoolerNoctua NH-U12S redux
Cooling TypeLiquidAir
Fan Speed2000 RPM1700 RPM
Socket CompatibilityIntel LGA1700, AMD AM4Intel LGA1700, AMD AM5
Thermal PasteNot specifiedNT-H1 included
Warranty6 years6 years

Dimension comparison

ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 - AIO CPU CoolerNoctua NH-U12S redux

Overview of the Products

In this comparison, we will look at two prominent CPU coolers: the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 and the Noctua NH-U12S redux. The ARCTIC cooler is priced at £56.49, while the Noctua variant is slightly more expensive at £65.68. Both products are designed to enhance CPU cooling efficiency, but they do so through different mechanisms and designs, catering to varying user needs.

Cooling Performance

The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 offers superior cooling performance due to its liquid cooling design, which typically allows for better heat dissipation under heavy loads. It features ARCTIC's P12 PRO fan, known for its higher maximum speed, which is particularly beneficial when the CPU is under stress. In contrast, the Noctua NH-U12S redux utilises a traditional air-cooling approach with its NF-P12 redux-1700 fan, which operates quietly, especially at idle. While the NH-U12S redux provides reliable cooling, it may not match the cooling efficiency of a liquid cooler like the ARCTIC under sustained high workloads.

Installation and Compatibility

When it comes to installation and compatibility, both coolers have their strengths. The Noctua NH-U12S redux is designed to fit most tower cases without blocking RAM slots or PCIe slots, making it a versatile choice for various builds. It includes the SecuFirm2 mounting system, which simplifies the installation process on a range of Intel and AMD sockets. On the other hand, the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 features a native offset mounting system that enhances heat transfer efficiency by aligning the cold plate with the CPU hotspot. However, being a liquid cooler, it may require more careful handling during installation compared to the more straightforward air cooler.

Noise Levels

Noise levels are a critical factor for many users, especially for those who prioritise a quiet computing environment. The Noctua NH-U12S redux excels in this area, featuring a quiet fan that operates near silently at idle. The use of PWM technology allows it to adjust speeds automatically based on cooling demand, maintaining a quieter operation under lighter loads. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240, while also designed for lower noise operation, is noted for its more powerful fan that may generate more noise under high speeds. Therefore, those seeking a quieter solution may lean towards the Noctua.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 presents a modern and sleek aesthetic with its liquid cooling setup. It includes an integrated cable management system that reduces visible cables, leading to a cleaner look in the PC case. Meanwhile, the Noctua NH-U12S redux maintains a classic air cooler appearance, which is well-regarded for its understated elegance and high-quality finish. The choice between these designs will largely depend on personal preference, but both units are visually appealing in their own right.

Thermal Paste and Accessories

Both coolers come with high-quality thermal paste, which is essential for optimal thermal conductivity between the CPU and cooler. The Noctua NH-U12S redux includes NT-H1 thermal paste, which is well-known for its performance and ease of application. In contrast, the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 does not specify a thermal paste but is designed to work effectively with the integrated cooling solutions it offers. Users may want to consider the included accessories and ease of application when making their choice, as this can impact overall installation satisfaction.

Brand Reputation and Reliability

Both ARCTIC and Noctua are reputable brands in the cooling market, known for their high-quality products. Noctua, in particular, has garnered a loyal following over the years, thanks to its commitment to performance and low noise levels. The NH-U12S redux is a continuation of this legacy, offering reliability and solid performance. ARCTIC, while perhaps less established in the air cooler segment, has made significant strides with its liquid coolers, aiming to provide efficient cooling solutions at competitive prices. User reviews and brand loyalty may influence buyers' decisions in this category.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two coolers is noteworthy, with the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 retailing at £56.49 and the Noctua NH-U12S redux at £65.68. The ARCTIC cooler offers a more budget-friendly option while providing advanced cooling technology. However, the slightly higher price of the Noctua cooler may be justified by its renowned quiet operation and ease of installation. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether users prioritise performance and budget or are willing to invest a bit more for the quiet and reliability that Noctua promises.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 and the Noctua NH-U12S redux comes down to specific user needs. If you require superior cooling performance for high-load situations and appreciate modern liquid cooling technology, the ARCTIC option is an excellent choice at £56.49. However, if you prefer a quieter operation, straightforward installation, and a reliable air cooler, the Noctua NH-U12S redux at £65.68 may be worth the extra investment. Ultimately, both coolers offer unique benefits, making them strong contenders in the CPU cooler market.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 - AIO CPU Cooler vs Noctua NH-U12S redux | versusfinder