ARCTIC MX-4 vs 6 Pack Assorted Thickness 0.5 1.0 1.5 mm Thermal Conductive Silicone Pads with 6
Updated August 2026 — The ARCTIC MX-4 is the better choice for high thermal performance and safety, while the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness pads offer versatility and a lower price.
The ARCTIC MX-4 is the better choice for high thermal performance and safety, while the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness pads offer versatility and a lower price.
Why ARCTIC MX-4 is better
thermal conductivity
MX-4 guarantees efficient heat dissipation
application safety
MX-4 is metal-free and non-electrically conductive
durability
MX-4 lasts at least 8 years once applied
Why 6 Pack Assorted Thickness 0.5 1.0 1.5 mm Thermal Conductive Silicone Pads with 6 is better
price
6 Pack pads are slightly cheaper at £5.55
versatility
6 Pack pads can be used in various applications
ease of installation
6 Pack pads come in multiple sizes for different needs
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC MX-4 | 6 Pack Assorted Thickness 0.5 1.0 1.5 mm Thermal Conductive Silicone Pads with 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ARCTIC | Adwits |
| Price | £5.68 | £5.55 |
| Thermal Conductivity | High | 6.0 W/Mk |
| Durability | 8 years | Not specified |
| Application Type | Thermal Paste | Thermal Pads |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When considering price, the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness thermal pads slightly edge out the ARCTIC MX-4. Priced at £5.55, they offer a more economical choice compared to the ARCTIC MX-4, which costs £5.68. The difference of just 13 pence may seem minor, but for those on a tight budget, this can impact purchasing decisions. Both products are affordable options for anyone looking to improve their thermal management, but the thermal pads provide a marginally cheaper solution.
Thermal Conductivity
The thermal conductivity of a product is crucial for effective cooling, and here the ARCTIC MX-4 shines. It is designed with carbon microparticles that ensure extremely high thermal conductivity, although the exact value is not specified. In contrast, the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness thermal pads boast a thermal conductivity of 6.0 W/Mk. While the pads have a clearly defined metric, the ARCTIC MX-4's performance is noted to guarantee efficient heat dissipation. This makes the MX-4 a reliable choice for users prioritising high thermal performance.
Application Safety
In terms of safety, the ARCTIC MX-4 is metal-free and non-electrically conductive, significantly reducing the risk of short circuits. This feature adds an extra layer of protection to sensitive components such as CPUs and VGA cards. On the other hand, the thermal pads are also safe, with high stability and electrical insulation, capable of functioning in temperatures from -40 to 200 degrees Celsius. Both products prioritise user safety, but the MX-4 offers specific assurances against electrical risks.
Durability
Durability is another vital aspect to consider when choosing between these two products. The ARCTIC MX-4 is noted for its longevity, lasting at least 8 years once applied. This means that users will not need to worry about reapplication for a significant duration. In contrast, while the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness pads are designed to be wear-resistant and stable, their longevity in comparison to a thermal paste like the MX-4 is not specified. Those looking for a long-term solution may find the MX-4 more appealing.
Ease of Use
The ease of application is a crucial factor for both novices and seasoned users. The ARCTIC MX-4 is praised for its ideal consistency, making it simple to apply even for beginners. In contrast, the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness thermal pads come in three different sizes (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm), allowing users to select the most suitable thickness for their specific needs. This versatility can make installation easier for some applications, though it may require cutting to fit. Both products offer user-friendly application methods, but the MX-4 may appeal more to those who prefer a paste over pads.
Versatility
When it comes to versatility, the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness thermal pads take the lead. These pads can be used in various applications, including control panels, automotive mechanics, and electronics cooling. Their adaptability makes them suitable for a wide range of devices. In contrast, the ARCTIC MX-4 is primarily designed for use with CPUs and GPUs. While it excels in its specific application, the thermal pads’ broader usability makes them a more versatile choice for users with different thermal management needs.
Performance Under Load
The performance under load is critical for ensuring optimal cooling during high-demand scenarios. The ARCTIC MX-4's formulation ensures that heat from the CPU or GPU is dissipated quickly and efficiently, which is crucial during intensive tasks such as gaming or rendering. The thermal pads, while having good thermal conductivity, do not explicitly mention performance under load in the same way. The MX-4’s assurance of excellent performance in these situations makes it a strong contender for high-performance systems.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the ARCTIC MX-4 and the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness thermal pads depends on your specific needs. If you prioritise high thermal conductivity, safety against electrical risks, and long-term durability, the ARCTIC MX-4 at £5.68 is a solid choice. However, if you are looking for versatility and a slightly lower price point, the 6 Pack Assorted Thickness pads at £5.55 might be the better option. Ultimately, both products can enhance thermal management effectively, but your choice should align with your particular applications and preferences.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

