ARCTIC MX-4 vs ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB- Single-tower CPU cooler with push-pull
Updated August 2026 — The ARCTIC MX-4 offers excellent thermal conductivity and longevity at a low price, while the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB provides advanced cooling performance with aesthetic appeal. Choose based on your specific needs.
The ARCTIC MX-4 offers excellent thermal conductivity and longevity at a low price, while the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB provides advanced cooling performance with aesthetic appeal. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why ARCTIC MX-4 is better
affordable price
MX-4 is priced at £5.68
long-lasting
MX-4 lasts at least 8 years without reapplication
easy application
MX-4 is easy to apply for beginners
Why ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB- Single-tower CPU cooler with push-pull is better
high performance
Freezer 36 A-RGB is designed for high-end CPUs
aesthetic appeal
Freezer 36 A-RGB features RGB lighting
efficient cooling
Freezer 36 A-RGB has advanced fan technology
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC MX-4 | ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB- Single-tower CPU cooler with push-pull |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ARCTIC | ARCTIC |
| ASIN | B07L9BDY3T | B09VH22MT1 |
| Material | Carbon | Aluminum |
| Fan Size | N/A | 120 mm |
| Heat Pipes | N/A | 4 |
| RGB Lighting | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Thermal Solutions
When considering thermal management for your PC, two products from ARCTIC stand out: the ARCTIC MX-4 thermal paste and the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB CPU cooler. The MX-4 is priced at £5.68 and is designed for efficient heat transfer between the CPU or GPU and their heatsink, while the Freezer 36 A-RGB, at £27.49, is a complete cooling solution that combines a single-tower design with advanced fan technology. Each product serves a distinct purpose in the realm of cooling, appealing to different user needs.
Performance and Efficiency
The ARCTIC MX-4 excels in thermal conductivity, featuring a formula made of carbon microparticles, which guarantees extremely high thermal conductivity, ensuring heat is dissipated quickly. This is crucial for maintaining optimal CPU or GPU performance during demanding tasks. In contrast, the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB utilises a unique design with four offset heat pipes and pressure-optimised 120 mm fans, enabling it to manage heat efficiently from high-end CPUs. This cooler is engineered for fast heat transfer, making it suitable for those pushing their systems to the limit.
Application and Installation
Ease of application is a key feature of the ARCTIC MX-4. Its ideal consistency makes it suitable even for beginners, allowing users to apply it without hassle. The MX-4 also has a long-lasting formula that does not need reapplication for at least eight years. On the other hand, the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB features an innovative Click-installation system, simplifying the mounting process. However, users must ensure they have the appropriate AMD mounting screws or request replacements, which could complicate installation for some.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a significant factor when selecting thermal solutions. The ARCTIC MX-4 stands out with its promise of longevity, lasting at least eight years without needing reapplication. This durability is crucial for users who prefer a low-maintenance approach to thermal management. In comparison, while the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB’s build quality is designed for efficient cooling, the longevity of its effectiveness largely depends on the maintenance of its fans and overall system cleanliness, which may require more frequent attention.
Compatibility and Versatility
In terms of compatibility, the ARCTIC MX-4 is a versatile thermal paste that can be applied to a variety of CPUs and GPUs without concerns of electrical conductivity. This makes it a safe choice for users across different systems. Conversely, the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB has specific installation requirements, particularly for AMD setups where users must have the original mounting screws. While it is compatible with most 120 mm fans, this requirement may limit its versatility compared to the MX-4.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetics play a role in modern PC building, and the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB includes RGB lighting, which can enhance the visual appeal of a gaming setup. This cooler not only optimises thermal performance but also adds a stylish element to your build. In contrast, the ARCTIC MX-4 focuses solely on performance and does not offer any visual enhancement. Users seeking a visually striking build may lean towards the Freezer 36 A-RGB, while those prioritising thermal efficiency may prefer the MX-4.
Price Consideration
The ARCTIC MX-4 is considerably more affordable at £5.68, making it an economical choice for enhancing thermal management without breaking the bank. It delivers excellent performance for its price point, especially for users looking to improve their existing cooling setup. The ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB, priced at £27.49, represents a more significant investment but offers a comprehensive cooling solution that integrates both performance and aesthetics. This price difference highlights the distinct market positions of each product.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ARCTIC MX-4 and the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are seeking a long-lasting thermal paste that provides excellent heat transfer and ease of application, the MX-4 is a solid choice at a low price point. However, if you require a high-performance cooler for a powerful CPU and appreciate the added aesthetic of RGB lighting, the Freezer 36 A-RGB justifies its higher price with its advanced design and capabilities. Your choice should align with your performance requirements and personal preferences in thermal management.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

