ARCTIC MX-4 vs ARCTIC P12 Pro PST - 5 Pack - Powerful Premium Fan
Updated August 2026 — The ARCTIC MX-4 excels in thermal conductivity, while the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST offers superior airflow management. Choose based on your cooling needs.
The ARCTIC MX-4 excels in thermal conductivity, while the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST offers superior airflow management. Choose based on your cooling needs.
Why ARCTIC MX-4 is better
price
MX-4 is cheaper at £11.49
application
MX-4 is easier for beginners to apply
silence
MX-4 operates silently as a thermal paste
Why ARCTIC P12 Pro PST - 5 Pack - Powerful Premium Fan is better
airflow
P12 Pro PST generates higher airflow at 3000 rpm
versatility
P12 Pro PST comes in a pack of five for multiple uses
build quality
P12 Pro PST features advanced engineering for reduced vibrations
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC MX-4 | ARCTIC P12 Pro PST - 5 Pack - Powerful Premium Fan |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ARCTIC | ARCTIC |
| Type | Thermal Paste | Fan |
| Conductivity | High | N/A |
| Pack Size | 1 | 5 |
| PWM Control | No | Yes |
| Material | Carbon | Plastic |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Products
When considering cooling solutions for your PC, the ARCTIC MX-4 thermal paste and the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST fan pack offer distinct benefits tailored to specific needs. The MX-4, priced at £11.49, is ideal for enhancing thermal conductivity, while the P12 Pro PST, available for £38.98 for a pack of five, focuses on efficient airflow and cooling performance. Understanding their core differences can help you decide which product aligns better with your requirements.
Performance Comparison
The performance metrics of the ARCTIC MX-4 and ARCTIC P12 Pro PST reveal their respective roles in thermal management. The MX-4 boasts high thermal conductivity, attributed to its carbon microparticle composition, ensuring heat from the CPU or GPU dissipates quickly and efficiently. In contrast, the P12 Pro PST fan generates a maximum airflow speed of 3000 rpm, providing significant cooling capabilities even under heavy resistance. This makes the MX-4 excellent for direct heat transfer, while the P12 Pro PST excels in airflow management, particularly in dense setups.
Application Ease
Ease of application is a crucial factor for many users, especially those new to PC building. The ARCTIC MX-4 thermal paste features an ideal consistency, making it user-friendly for beginners. Its non-metallic and non-electrically conductive properties further ensure safe application, reducing the risk of short circuits. Conversely, the P12 Pro PST fan utilises a 4-pin PWM connection, allowing for easy integration into most systems, with the fan stopping completely at less than 5% PWM. While both products are designed for straightforward use, the MX-4 stands out for its simplicity in application.
Build Quality and Design
Build quality significantly influences the longevity and effectiveness of cooling products. The ARCTIC MX-4's formulation has remained unchanged despite alterations in packaging, indicating a commitment to quality over time. The P12 Pro PST, on the other hand, features precision manufacturing techniques that reduce vibrations and enhance smoothness during operation. Its redesigned fan blades are specifically crafted for optimal performance at low noise levels. Both products reflect ARCTIC's dedication to high-quality designs, but the P12 Pro PST appears to have an edge regarding advanced engineering.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are a vital consideration for users seeking a quiet computing experience. The ARCTIC MX-4, being a thermal paste, operates silently as it does not produce noise during use. In contrast, the P12 Pro PST fan is designed with a smooth-running fluid dynamic bearing that minimises noise, making it ideal for quiet operation. While the fan may produce sound, its design aims to keep it to a minimum, ensuring that users can enjoy a quieter environment when in use. Thus, if silence is a priority, the MX-4 is the clear choice, while the P12 Pro PST offers a balanced approach with reduced noise levels.
Versatility
Versatility is essential when choosing cooling solutions, as users often require products that can adapt to various systems and setups. The ARCTIC MX-4 is suitable for multiple applications, including CPUs and GPUs, making it a versatile thermal paste for various builds. The P12 Pro PST, sold in a pack of five, is designed for efficient cooling across multiple fans in a single setup or can be used to replace older or less efficient fans. This flexibility allows users to customise their cooling solutions effectively, catering to both small and large builds.
Price Consideration
Price is always a significant factor when making purchasing decisions. The ARCTIC MX-4 is priced at £11.49, making it an affordable option for those looking to improve their thermal management without breaking the bank. In contrast, the P12 Pro PST is priced at £38.98 for a five-pack, which equates to approximately £7.80 per fan. While the initial investment is higher, the number of fans included offers a compelling value for users needing multiple cooling solutions. Ultimately, the choice may depend on whether you prioritise a singular, effective thermal solution or multiple fans for broader airflow management.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ARCTIC MX-4 and the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST hinges on your specific cooling needs. If you require an efficient thermal paste that ensures quick heat dissipation, then the MX-4 is the better option at £11.49. However, if your focus is on overall airflow management and you appreciate the benefits of multiple fans, the P12 Pro PST, priced at £38.98 for a five-pack, would be the more suitable choice. Assess your priorities—whether it’s direct heat transfer or comprehensive cooling—and decide accordingly.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

