vsversusfinder

ARCTIC MX-4 vs Corsair Hydro X Series

Updated August 2026The ARCTIC MX-4 is a reliable and easy-to-use thermal paste, while the Corsair Hydro X Series offers advanced liquid cooling with customization options. Choose based on your cooling needs.

The ARCTIC MX-4 is a reliable and easy-to-use thermal paste, while the Corsair Hydro X Series offers advanced liquid cooling with customization options. Choose based on your cooling needs.

Why ARCTIC MX-4 is better

Price

ARCTIC MX-4 is significantly cheaper at £5.68.

Ease of Use

ARCTIC MX-4 is user-friendly, ideal for beginners.

Longevity

ARCTIC MX-4 lasts at least 8 years without reapplication.

Why Corsair Hydro X Series is better

Customization

Corsair Hydro X Series offers vibrant color options.

Liquid Cooling

Corsair Hydro X Series provides advanced cooling performance.

Component Protection

Corsair Hydro X Series includes anti-corrosion inhibitors.

Overall score

ARCTIC MX-4
85
Corsair Hydro X Series
75

Specifications

SpecARCTIC MX-4Corsair Hydro X Series
BrandARCTICCorsair
TypeThermal PasteLiquid Cooling
Price£5.68£14.99
Durability8 yearsN/A
ConductivityHighN/A

Dimension comparison

ARCTIC MX-4Corsair Hydro X Series

Overview of ARCTIC MX-4 and Corsair Hydro X Series

The ARCTIC MX-4 and Corsair Hydro X Series are both designed to improve cooling performance, but they cater to different needs and types of users. The ARCTIC MX-4 is a thermal paste priced at £5.68, while the Corsair Hydro X Series is a liquid cooling solution available for £14.99. Users should consider their specific requirements for cooling to determine which product meets their expectations.

Performance Comparison

In terms of performance, the ARCTIC MX-4 boasts high thermal conductivity due to its carbon microparticle composition, ensuring efficient heat dissipation from CPUs and GPUs. This allows for consistent performance over time, making it suitable for users looking for reliable thermal paste. On the other hand, the Corsair Hydro X Series also offers excellent cooling performance with its pre-mixed coolant that is ready to use right out of the bottle. However, it is designed for a more elaborate liquid cooling setup rather than just thermal paste application.

Application Ease

When it comes to ease of application, the ARCTIC MX-4 is noted for its ideal consistency, making it user-friendly even for beginners. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who may not have experience with thermal pastes. Conversely, the Corsair Hydro X Series requires a more complex setup due to its liquid cooling system, which may be daunting for novice users. Therefore, the ARCTIC MX-4 excels in terms of straightforward application compared to the more intricate process of setting up the Hydro X Series.

Safety Features

The safety characteristics of both products differ significantly. The ARCTIC MX-4 is metal-free and non-electrically conductive, which mitigates the risk of short circuits, offering additional protection for CPUs and VGA cards. In contrast, the Corsair Hydro X Series features advanced anti-corrosion and anti-bacterial inhibitors, ensuring that the coolant does not tarnish or damage components like copper, brass, and nickel. Each product provides its own type of safety, appealing to different user preferences.

Longevity and Durability

Durability is a key feature of the ARCTIC MX-4, as it claims to last at least eight years once applied, eliminating the need for frequent reapplications. This long lifespan makes it a cost-effective choice for users who prioritise longevity. Meanwhile, the Corsair Hydro X Series is designed for long-lasting performance with its pre-mixed coolant, but specific longevity claims were not provided. Users seeking a reliable and lasting solution may find the ARCTIC MX-4 more appealing based on its explicit durability promise.

Customisation Options

The Corsair Hydro X Series stands out in terms of customisation, offering a vibrant range of translucent colours for users to enhance their liquid cooling loops. This feature allows users to personalise their setups aesthetically, something that the ARCTIC MX-4 does not provide, as it is a standard thermal paste without any visual customisation options. Gamers and PC builders looking for an eye-catching cooling solution will likely gravitate towards the Corsair Hydro X Series for its visual appeal.

Target Audience

The target audience for these products varies significantly. The ARCTIC MX-4 is ideal for gamers or PC builders looking for an effective and straightforward thermal paste that offers excellent performance at a low price of £5.68. Alternatively, the Corsair Hydro X Series appeals to more experienced users interested in building a custom liquid cooling system. At £14.99, it is designed for those who value aesthetics and advanced cooling solutions over simplicity and cost.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ARCTIC MX-4 and the Corsair Hydro X Series ultimately depends on your cooling needs and expertise. If you require a reliable, easy-to-apply thermal paste with a long lifespan, the ARCTIC MX-4 at £5.68 is the clear choice. However, if you are looking to invest in a custom liquid cooling system with vibrant colours and advanced performance, then the Corsair Hydro X Series, priced at £14.99, would be more suitable. Consider your specific requirements and budget to determine the best product for your cooling solution.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

ARCTIC MX-4 vs Corsair Hydro X Series | versusfinder