ARCTIC MX-4 vs Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste
Updated August 2026 — The ARCTIC MX-4 offers excellent value and longevity, while the Corsair XTM70 is tailored for high-performance needs.
The ARCTIC MX-4 offers excellent value and longevity, while the Corsair XTM70 is tailored for high-performance needs.
Why ARCTIC MX-4 is better
price
ARCTIC MX-4 is significantly cheaper at £5.68.
durability
ARCTIC MX-4 lasts at least eight years.
safety
ARCTIC MX-4 is metal-free and non-electrically conductive.
Why Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste is better
performance
Corsair XTM70 is designed for high-performance CPUs up to 250W TDP.
application tools
Corsair XTM70 includes an applicator kit and cleaning wipes.
thermal transfer
Corsair XTM70 provides peak thermal transfer for demanding applications.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC MX-4 | Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ARCTIC | Corsair |
| Current Price | £5.68 | £14.99 |
| Thermal Conductivity | High | Very High |
| Application Kit | No | Yes |
| Lifespan | 8 years | Not specified |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the ARCTIC MX-4 is significantly more affordable than the Corsair XTM70. The ARCTIC MX-4 is priced at £5.68, while the Corsair XTM70 is available for £14.99. This means that the Corsair XTM70 is more than two and a half times the cost of the ARCTIC MX-4. For budget-conscious consumers or those looking to apply thermal paste on multiple components, the ARCTIC MX-4 offers a more economical solution without sacrificing quality.
Performance Capabilities
Both the ARCTIC MX-4 and Corsair XTM70 are designed to provide excellent thermal conductivity, but they target different performance levels. The ARCTIC MX-4 utilises carbon microparticles to ensure extremely high thermal conductivity, making it suitable for general-purpose use across CPUs and GPUs. In contrast, the Corsair XTM70 is specifically designed for high-performance processors up to 250W TDP and higher, catering to users with demanding cooling needs. This distinction makes the Corsair a better choice for users running high-end gaming rigs or overclocked systems.
Application Ease
The ARCTIC MX-4 is lauded for its ease of application, particularly for beginners, due to its ideal consistency. It ensures a straightforward application process without the need for extensive experience. On the other hand, the Corsair XTM70 features low viscosity, allowing it to spread evenly and cleanly with the included applicator kit. This thoughtful design aids in achieving peak thermal transfer. While both products offer user-friendly application methods, the added tools that come with the Corsair can enhance the experience for those who may be less confident in their thermal paste application skills.
Durability and Longevity
In terms of longevity, the ARCTIC MX-4 boasts a remarkable lifespan, lasting at least eight years once applied. This durability means users can install it and forget about reapplication for a significant period, which is especially advantageous for those who prefer minimal maintenance. Conversely, the Corsair XTM70 does not specify a longevity claim, leaving uncertainty regarding its reapplication frequency. For users prioritising long-term reliability without frequent upkeep, the ARCTIC MX-4 presents a clear advantage.
Safety Features
Safety is a critical consideration when choosing thermal paste, and the ARCTIC MX-4 excels in this area. It is metal-free and non-electrically conductive, which mitigates the risk of short circuits during application. This feature adds a layer of protection for both CPUs and VGA cards. The Corsair XTM70 does not highlight specific safety features, potentially leaving users with concerns about application risks. For those prioritising safety in their thermal paste choice, the ARCTIC MX-4 is a more reassuring option.
Versatility
The versatility of a thermal paste can significantly impact its utility across different systems. The ARCTIC MX-4 is designed for a wide range of applications, making it suitable for both CPUs and GPUs alike. In comparison, while the Corsair XTM70 is excellent for high-performance CPUs, it is primarily targeted at users with specific high-TDP needs, such as gaming or workstations. If you need a versatile thermal paste that can adapt to various uses, the ARCTIC MX-4 is a more flexible choice for general applications.
Packaging and Extras
When it comes to packaging, the Corsair XTM70 includes an applicator kit and three cleaning wipes for easy application and preparation of the surfaces. This added value can be beneficial for users who need a complete solution, especially when removing old thermal paste. The ARCTIC MX-4, while having a reliable packaging design, does not come with additional accessories, which may be a consideration for those looking for a comprehensive kit. The inclusion of extras with the Corsair can be appealing, making it a more attractive option for those who appreciate a full-service product.
Which should you buy?
In summary, your choice between the ARCTIC MX-4 and Corsair XTM70 should be guided by your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for an economical, versatile, and long-lasting thermal paste that is easy to apply and safe, the ARCTIC MX-4 at £5.68 is an excellent choice. However, if you are using a high-performance CPU that requires optimal thermal transfer and are willing to invest more for that capability, the Corsair XTM70 at £14.99 provides superior performance, especially for demanding applications. Ultimately, both products excel in their own right, but your requirements will dictate the best fit for you.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

