ARCTIC MX-4 vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
Updated August 2026 — The ARCTIC MX-4 offers great value and durability, while the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut excels in performance and thermal conductivity.
The ARCTIC MX-4 offers great value and durability, while the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut excels in performance and thermal conductivity.
Why ARCTIC MX-4 is better
cost-effective
ARCTIC MX-4 is cheaper at £5.68
durability
lasts at least 8 years
ease of application
ideal consistency for beginners
Why Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is better
thermal conductivity
Kryonaut has 12.5W/mK rating
performance
designed for demanding applications
application tools
includes spatula for even spreading
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC MX-4 | Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ARCTIC | Thermal Grizzly |
| Price (GBP) | £5.68 | £6.95 |
| Thermal Conductivity | Not stated | 12.5W/mK |
| Durability | 8 years | Not specified |
| Application Tool | None | Spatula included |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the ARCTIC MX-4 is the more budget-friendly option at £5.68, while the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is priced at £6.95. This difference of £1.27 may seem modest, but for those on a tight budget, every penny counts. The lower cost of the ARCTIC MX-4 makes it an attractive choice for users looking for effective thermal paste without breaking the bank. However, some might argue that the slightly higher price of the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is justified by its advanced performance capabilities, especially for high-end applications.
Thermal Conductivity
The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut boasts an impressive thermal conductivity rating of 12.5W/mK, which positions it as a top-tier choice for those seeking maximum heat dissipation. In contrast, the ARCTIC MX-4's thermal conductivity is not explicitly stated but is described as being "extremely high." While the exact figures for the MX-4 are not provided, it is essential to note that the Kryonaut is specifically designed for demanding configurations, making it a preferred option for overclocking and industrial applications.
Application Ease
Both products are designed with user-friendliness in mind, but they approach ease of application differently. The ARCTIC MX-4 is noted for its ideal consistency, making it easy to apply, even for beginners. On the other hand, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut comes with a specially designed spatula to ensure even spreading and optimal coverage. This added tool can be beneficial for achieving better application results, particularly for users who may not be as experienced with thermal paste application.
Safety Features
Safety is a crucial consideration when applying thermal paste, and both products excel in this regard. The ARCTIC MX-4 is metal-free and non-electrically conductive, eliminating the risk of short circuits, which adds an extra layer of protection. Similarly, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is also designed to be neither electrically conductive nor capacitive, ensuring safe application and safeguarding valuable hardware. This makes both options reliable choices for users concerned about potential damage during installation.
Durability
Durability is another area where the ARCTIC MX-4 stands out, as it is designed to last for at least eight years once applied. This longevity means that users can apply it once and forget about it for nearly a decade, making it a low-maintenance option. In comparison, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut does not specify a durability period, which could imply a need for reapplication sooner than the MX-4. This significant difference may influence users who prefer a long-lasting thermal solution.
Versatility
In terms of versatility, both the ARCTIC MX-4 and the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut are suitable for a variety of applications, including CPUs and GPUs. However, the Kryonaut is particularly highlighted for its effectiveness in "even the most demanding configurations and industrial applications." This suggests that while both pastes can be used across various components, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut may perform better under extreme conditions, appealing to enthusiasts and professionals alike.
Brand Reputation
Brand reputation can significantly influence purchasing decisions, and both ARCTIC and Thermal Grizzly have established themselves as reputable names in the cooling solutions market. ARCTIC is known for delivering consistent quality and reliable performance, while Thermal Grizzly has built its reputation on providing high-performance products tailored for serious gamers and overclockers. Choosing between these brands may depend on personal experiences or specific needs, such as the level of performance required.
Which should you buy?
The choice between the ARCTIC MX-4 and the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut ultimately depends on your specific requirements and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective, durable solution that is easy to apply and offers reliable performance, the ARCTIC MX-4 at £5.68 is a strong contender. However, if you need a high-performance thermal paste for demanding applications and are willing to invest a bit more at £6.95, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut with its exceptional thermal conductivity might be the better choice.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

