ARCTIC MX-4 vs Thermalright TF4 4g Thermal Compound Paste for Coolers
Updated August 2026 — The ARCTIC MX-4 offers superior longevity and brand reputation, while the Thermalright TF4 is more budget-friendly with impressive performance. Choose based on your specific needs.
The ARCTIC MX-4 offers superior longevity and brand reputation, while the Thermalright TF4 is more budget-friendly with impressive performance. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why ARCTIC MX-4 is better
Longevity
Lasts at least 8 years once applied
Brand Reputation
ARCTIC is well-known for quality
Safety Features
Metal-free and non-conductive
Why Thermalright TF4 4g Thermal Compound Paste for Coolers is better
Price
Lower cost at £3.69
Thermal Conductivity
Rated at 9.5 W/m·K
Application Design
Needle-type design for easy application
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC MX-4 | Thermalright TF4 4g Thermal Compound Paste for Coolers |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ARCTIC | Thermalright |
| Thermal Conductivity | High | 9.5 W/m·K |
| Longevity | 8 years | Not specified |
| Metal-Free | Yes | Yes |
| Application Type | Easy | Needle-type |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ARCTIC MX-4 is priced at £5.68, while the Thermalright TF4 is more budget-friendly at £3.69. This difference of £1.99 may influence buyers looking for the best value for money. Despite the higher cost, the premium ARCTIC MX-4 is known for its consistent quality and durability, lasting up to eight years once applied. In contrast, the Thermalright TF4 offers excellent performance at a lower price, making it a compelling option for those who want effective thermal conductivity without breaking the bank.
Performance Analysis
When it comes to thermal conductivity, the Thermalright TF4 boasts impressive specifications with a thermal conductivity rating of 9.5 W/m·K. This high performance ensures excellent cooling for CPUs and GPUs, which is critical for maintaining optimal operating temperatures. The ARCTIC MX-4, on the other hand, is made from carbon microparticles, providing high thermal conductivity as well. Although the exact rating is not specified, users can expect effective heat dissipation, particularly given its reputation for excellent performance in the market.
Application Ease
Both the ARCTIC MX-4 and Thermalright TF4 are designed for easy application, but they have different approaches. The ARCTIC MX-4 features a consistency that is ideal for beginners, making it straightforward to apply. In contrast, the Thermalright TF4 comes with a needle-type design that simplifies application and storage, along with a spatula for achieving a homogeneous thin layer. This design detail can make a significant difference for users who may not have prior experience with thermal paste application.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a prominent feature of the ARCTIC MX-4, which claims not to degrade over time and can last for at least eight years once applied. This long lifespan means users won't need to frequently replace it, saving time and effort. The Thermalright TF4 also emphasises durability, with a long service life and low volatility, ensuring that its thermal conductivity remains effective across various electronic components. However, it does not specify a longevity duration like the MX-4, which may be a consideration for those prioritising longevity.
Safety Features
Safety is a crucial aspect when selecting thermal paste, and both products excel in this area. The ARCTIC MX-4 is metal-free and non-electrically conductive, significantly reducing the risk of short circuits that could damage CPUs or GPUs. Similarly, the Thermalright TF4 does not contain metal particles and is non-corrosive, making it safe for use on electronic components. Both products provide peace of mind for users concerned about potential damage from thermal paste application.
Temperature Stability
The Thermalright TF4 operates effectively within a wide temperature range of -50℃ to +240℃, showcasing its adaptability in various environmental conditions. This is particularly beneficial for users who may encounter extreme temperatures. The ARCTIC MX-4 does not specify a temperature range, which could be a disadvantage for those specifically looking for performance under extreme conditions. However, the overall stability of both products under normal operating temperatures is commendable, ensuring reliable performance.
Brand Reputation
ARCTIC is well-known in the cooling solutions market for producing high-quality thermal compounds and has established a strong reputation over the years. The MX-4 is often regarded as a go-to option for enthusiasts and professionals alike. Thermalright also has a good standing and is recognised for delivering effective cooling solutions, but may not be as widely acclaimed as ARCTIC. Brand reputation can play a significant role in the purchasing decision for many consumers, particularly those who value reliability and proven performance.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ARCTIC MX-4 and Thermalright TF4 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a product that offers excellent longevity and a strong reputation, the ARCTIC MX-4 may be the better choice despite its higher price of £5.68. However, if you are seeking an effective thermal compound at a lower price point, the Thermalright TF4 at £3.69 provides great value with solid performance. In summary, both thermal pastes deliver reliable cooling, but your decision should hinge on factors like budget, application ease, and brand preference.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

