vsversusfinder

ARCTIC MX-6 vs Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste

Updated August 2026The ARCTIC MX-6 offers better value for money with proven performance and safety features, while the Corsair XTM70 excels in ease of use and application versatility.

The ARCTIC MX-6 offers better value for money with proven performance and safety features, while the Corsair XTM70 excels in ease of use and application versatility.

Why ARCTIC MX-6 is better

price

ARCTIC MX-6 is £6.99 compared to Corsair XTM70 at £14.99

safety

MX-6 is non-conductive and non-capacitive, reducing risk of damage

performance

MX-6 boasts 20% better performance than its predecessor

Why Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste is better

ease of use

Corsair XTM70 includes cleaning wipes for easier application

quantity

XTM70 provides enough paste for multiple applications

high performance

XTM70 is suitable for high-performance CPUs up to 250W TDP

Overall score

ARCTIC MX-6
85
Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste
75

Specifications

SpecARCTIC MX-6Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste
BrandARCTICCorsair
Current Price£6.99£14.99
Thermal ResistanceLowerStandard
Included ToolsNoneCleaning Wipes
TDP SupportN/AUp to 250W

Dimension comparison

ARCTIC MX-6Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste

Price Comparison

When considering budgetary constraints, the ARCTIC MX-6 is significantly more affordable at £6.99 compared to the Corsair XTM70, which costs £14.99. This price difference of £8.00 makes the ARCTIC MX-6 an attractive option for users looking to save money without compromising on quality. The lower price point of the MX-6 may appeal to casual gamers or PC builders who are mindful of their expenditure, while the higher cost of the XTM70 could be justified for users requiring extreme performance and reliability in demanding applications.

Performance Evaluation

The ARCTIC MX-6 boasts a 20% better performance compared to its predecessor, the MX-4, thanks to its improved composition and lower thermal resistance. This enhancement is particularly relevant for users seeking efficient heat transfer, especially in high-performance computing scenarios. In contrast, the Corsair XTM70 is designed to keep high-end CPUs and GPUs cool effectively, making it suitable for processors with a thermal design power (TDP) of up to 250W and higher. While both products aim to improve thermal performance, the MX-6 is specifically marketed as having measurable performance improvements, which could be a decisive factor for performance-oriented users.

Application Versatility

The ARCTIC MX-6 is designed for versatile application, suitable for multiple scenarios, including direct-die cooling for GPUs and console processors. This adaptability is a significant advantage for users who may need to apply thermal paste in various configurations. Conversely, the Corsair XTM70 also emphasises ease of application with low viscosity, allowing it to spread evenly and cleanly using an included applicator kit. While both pastes are versatile, the MX-6's focus on diverse application scenarios may provide an edge for users with different types of hardware.

Ease of Use

In terms of ease of application, the Corsair XTM70 comes equipped with three included cleaning wipes, making it simpler to prepare surfaces for new thermal paste. This feature can be particularly beneficial for users who frequently upgrade or maintain their systems. The ARCTIC MX-6, while also easy to use, does not mention any additional cleaning tools included in the package. For those who value a streamlined application process, the XTM70 may offer a more user-friendly experience due to these supplementary aids.

Safety Features

The ARCTIC MX-6 is noted for its safety, being neither electrically conductive nor capacitive, which significantly reduces the risk of short circuits or discharges during application. This feature is crucial for users concerned about damaging sensitive components during installation. While the Corsair XTM70 does not explicitly mention safety features, it focuses on effective heat transfer, which implies a level of reliability. However, the explicit safety assurances of the MX-6 give it a notable advantage for cautious users.

Brand Reputation

Both ARCTIC and Corsair have established strong reputations in the PC cooling market. ARCTIC boasts over 20 years of experience, emphasising its focus on quality and performance. Corsair is also a well-respected brand, particularly in the gaming and high-performance computing sectors. Users may be influenced by brand loyalty or past experiences; however, ARCTIC's longstanding presence in the market may provide an added layer of trust for those prioritising proven quality.

Packaging and Quantity

The Corsair XTM70 includes a substantial amount of thermal paste, described as sufficient for multiple applications, which can be a considerable advantage for users who frequently upgrade or maintain their systems. In contrast, the ARCTIC MX-6 does not specify the quantity or number of applications, which may leave users wondering about its longevity. For individuals who value getting the most out of their investment, the XTM70’s ample supply may be more appealing.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the ARCTIC MX-6 and the Corsair XTM70 will depend on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective solution with proven performance and safety features, the ARCTIC MX-6 at £6.99 is a compelling choice. However, if you require high-end performance for demanding applications and value ease of use with included cleaning tools, the Corsair XTM70 at £14.99 could justify its higher price. Each product has its merits, so consider what features are most important to your computing needs before making a decision.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

ARCTIC MX-6 vs Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste | versusfinder