ARCTIC MX-7 vs Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM
Updated August 2026 — The ARCTIC MX-7 offers better value and longevity, while the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM provides ease of application with its unique phase change material.
The ARCTIC MX-7 offers better value and longevity, while the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM provides ease of application with its unique phase change material.
Why ARCTIC MX-7 is better
Price
ARCTIC MX-7 is cheaper at £7.29
Longevity
MX-7 offers long-term stability without frequent reapplication
Versatility
MX-7 is suitable for a wider range of devices
Why Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM is better
Ease of Use
PhaseSheet PTM liquefies at 45°C for easy application
Thermal Conductivity
PhaseSheet PTM features phase change material for efficient cooling
Thickness
PhaseSheet PTM allows for minimal thickness upon application
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC MX-7 | Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ARCTIC | Thermal Grizzly |
| Type | Thermal Paste | Thermal Pad |
| Current Price | £7.29 | £11.40 |
| Non-Conductive | Yes | Yes |
| Application Method | Pressure Application | Phase Change |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Thermal Pastes and Pads
In the realm of thermal management, both the ARCTIC MX-7 and Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM stand out for their unique approaches. The ARCTIC MX-7, priced at £7.29, positions itself as a high-performance thermal paste, while the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM, at £11.40, offers a thermal pad solution. Understanding their differences helps in selecting the right product for effective cooling.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal conductivity is vital for efficient heat transfer, and both products excel in this area. The ARCTIC MX-7 boasts a performance-optimised formulation with a high filler content designed for exceptional heat transfer. In contrast, the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM features phase change material that provides excellent thermal conductivity, particularly effective for CPUs and GPUs. Ultimately, while both products promise strong thermal performance, the MX-7 relies on its paste consistency, whereas the PhaseSheet PTM employs a unique phase change mechanism for optimal cooling.
Application Method
The application methods of these products differ significantly, impacting user experience. The ARCTIC MX-7 is designed to be applied under pressure, spreading naturally without manual spreading, which prevents air bubbles from forming. On the other hand, the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM is solid at room temperature and liquefies at 45°C, making it easy to apply without the risk of making a mess. This distinction may appeal to users who prefer a straightforward application process, with the PhaseSheet PTM possibly offering a more user-friendly experience.
Longevity and Stability
Longevity is a critical factor when choosing thermal solutions, and both products offer impressive stability. The ARCTIC MX-7 claims long-term stability, preventing common issues such as pump-out or bleeding, even through repeated thermal cycles. It promises consistent performance without the need for frequent reapplication. Conversely, the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM maintains stable thermal conductivity for up to ten thermal cycles, making it reliable over time. While both options provide durability, the MX-7 leans towards a longer-lasting paste solution.
Safety Features
Safety is paramount when dealing with thermal compounds, especially around sensitive electronics. The ARCTIC MX-7 is electrically non-conductive and non-capacitive, ensuring it is safe for use on CPUs, GPUs, laptops, and consoles without the risk of short circuits. Similarly, the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM is also non-electrically conductive, making it suitable for sensitive components. While both products are safe to use, the MX-7’s design specifically targets a wide range of devices, appealing to varied user needs.
Consistency and Texture
The texture and consistency of thermal compounds can significantly influence their performance. The ARCTIC MX-7 features a dense and highly viscous consistency, optimised for effective application and performance. This specific formulation helps it to create a reliable bond line under cooler pressure. In contrast, the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM has a very low viscosity in its liquid state, allowing for minimal thickness upon application. This difference in texture may lead to varied user preferences, with some favouring the paste's density while others may appreciate the thin layer offered by the pad.
Versatility
Versatility is another critical consideration when comparing these products. The ARCTIC MX-7 is designed for use across a wide range of devices, including CPUs, GPUs, and other electronics, ensuring broad compatibility. The Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM, while versatile, is particularly noted for its performance in different cooling systems and its phase change properties. Therefore, while both products cater to different user needs, the MX-7’s broader application potential may make it a more flexible choice for users with multiple devices.
Price Point
Price can heavily influence purchasing decisions, and there is a notable difference between these two products. The ARCTIC MX-7 is priced at £7.29, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers looking for high-quality thermal paste. In contrast, the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM comes in at £11.40, reflecting its premium design and performance features. This price difference may make the MX-7 appealing for those seeking value, while the PhaseSheet PTM may attract users willing to invest more for its unique benefits.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ARCTIC MX-7 and Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prefer a thermal paste with a proven track record of longevity, safety, and versatility at a lower price, the ARCTIC MX-7 is an excellent choice. However, if you seek a thermal pad with unique phase change material and easy application, the Thermal Grizzly - PhaseSheet PTM may be worth the additional cost. Consider your cooling requirements, application method preferences, and budget to determine the best fit for your system.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

