vsversusfinder

AZDelivery NodeMCU WiFi Lolin V3 ESP8266 ESP-12F Internet Development Board Modu vs diymore 1pcs for ESP32-CAM-MB WiFi Bluetooth Development Board

Updated August 2026The AZDelivery NodeMCU is a cost-effective choice for basic WiFi applications, while the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB offers superior processing power and Bluetooth capabilities.

The AZDelivery NodeMCU is a cost-effective choice for basic WiFi applications, while the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB offers superior processing power and Bluetooth capabilities.

Why AZDelivery NodeMCU WiFi Lolin V3 ESP8266 ESP-12F Internet Development Board Modu is better

lower price

AZDelivery NodeMCU costs £7.78 compared to £10.98 for diymore

compact size

NodeMCU is smaller, making it ideal for tight spaces

ease of use

NodeMCU comes with an E-Book for beginners

Why diymore 1pcs for ESP32-CAM-MB WiFi Bluetooth Development Board is better

higher performance

diymore has a main frequency of 240MHz and 600 DMIPS

Bluetooth support

diymore includes Bluetooth functionality

more memory

diymore has 520 KB SRAM and supports 8MB PSRAM

Overall score

AZDelivery NodeMCU WiFi Lolin V3 ESP8266 ESP-12F Internet Development Board Modu
75
diymore 1pcs for ESP32-CAM-MB WiFi Bluetooth Development Board
85

Specifications

SpecAZDelivery NodeMCU WiFi Lolin V3 ESP8266 ESP-12F Internet Development Board Modudiymore 1pcs for ESP32-CAM-MB WiFi Bluetooth Development Board
MicrocontrollerESP8266ESP32
WiFi Standard802.11 b/g/n802.11 b/g/n
BluetoothNoYes
Processing Power80 MHz240 MHz
SRAM4Mbit520 KB
Price£7.78£10.98

Dimension comparison

AZDelivery NodeMCU WiFi Lolin V3 ESP8266 ESP-12F Internet Development Board Modudiymore 1pcs for ESP32-CAM-MB WiFi Bluetooth Development Board

Overview of the AZDelivery NodeMCU and diymore ESP32-CAM-MB

The AZDelivery NodeMCU WiFi Lolin V3 is priced at £7.78, while the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB is available for £10.98. Both boards are designed for development purposes but cater to different project requirements. The NodeMCU is centred around the ESP8266, known for its ease of use in WiFi applications, while the diymore board harnesses the more powerful ESP32, offering Bluetooth capabilities and enhanced processing power.

The NodeMCU features the ESP-12F microcontroller, which provides reliable WiFi connectivity with a maximum output of 20Bm. Its compact design, measuring 58 mm by 31 mm, is ideal for home automation projects such as temperature and humidity monitoring. Conversely, the diymore board boasts a main frequency of up to 240MHz and a computing power of 600 DMIPS, making it suitable for more demanding applications requiring both WiFi and Bluetooth functionalities.

Performance Comparison

When it comes to performance, the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB takes the lead. With a main frequency of 240MHz and a computing power of 600 DMIPS, this board is optimised for applications requiring higher processing capabilities. In contrast, the AZDelivery NodeMCU operates on the ESP8266 and, while adequate for basic tasks, does not match the performance metrics of the ESP32.

The NodeMCU is designed for simpler projects, leveraging its powerful on-board storage and processing capabilities in a user-friendly environment. However, for projects that require more advanced features, such as camera integration or multiple interface support, the diymore board is better suited, given its support for a variety of communication protocols and external components.

Connectivity Features

Connectivity is another critical aspect where these two boards differ significantly. The AZDelivery NodeMCU is equipped with robust WiFi capabilities, supporting the 802.11 b/g/n WLAN standard. This makes it a straightforward choice for projects focused solely on wireless networking.

On the other hand, the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB not only supports WiFi but also includes Bluetooth functionality. This versatility allows it to operate in various modes, such as STA, AP, or a combination of both. For developers looking to create applications that require both WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity, the diymore board presents a more comprehensive solution.

Development and Programming Ease

When evaluating ease of development and programming, the AZDelivery NodeMCU shines with its user-friendly approach. It comes with an E-Book that guides users through the setup process, making it ideal for beginners or those looking to prototype quickly. The NodeMCU also supports Lua scripting, simplifying the programming experience for users.

In contrast, the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB is designed with a more complex architecture that offers greater flexibility but may require a deeper understanding of programming and hardware interfacing. While it supports various interfaces such as UART, SPI, and I2C, users may need to invest more time in learning how to utilise these features effectively.

Size and Form Factor

In terms of size and form factor, the AZDelivery NodeMCU is compact, measuring 58 mm in length and 31 mm in width. This small footprint makes it suitable for tight spaces in embedded applications. Its design is specifically optimised for breadboarding, which is a significant advantage for hobbyists and developers needing to prototype quickly.

The diymore ESP32-CAM-MB, while not excessively large, has a more complex layout due to additional components such as camera support. This may affect how it is integrated into certain projects. However, for applications requiring a camera, the added size is a beneficial trade-off for the capabilities provided.

Memory and Storage Capabilities

Memory and storage are pivotal in determining the performance of development boards. The AZDelivery NodeMCU features a flash memory chip of 32 Mbit (4M), which is adequate for many basic applications. The powerful processing capabilities of the ESP8266 enable efficient operation within this memory constraint.

Conversely, the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB is equipped with 520 KB of built-in SRAM and supports an external 8MB of PSRAM. This expanded memory availability allows it to handle more complex tasks and larger data sets, making it a better option for projects that require significant data processing or storage, such as image or video handling.

Intended Use Cases

The intended use cases for these two boards highlight their differences. The AZDelivery NodeMCU is particularly well-suited for home automation projects, such as temperature and humidity monitoring. Its ease of programming and compact size make it appealing for enthusiasts and those new to electronics.

In contrast, the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB is ideal for more demanding applications that require both WiFi and Bluetooth, such as IoT projects involving real-time data processing and communication with multiple devices. Its support for various interfaces and camera compatibility opens up a broader range of possibilities for developers.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the AZDelivery NodeMCU WiFi Lolin V3 and the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB ultimately depends on your specific project needs. If you are looking for a cost-effective, user-friendly board for basic WiFi applications, the NodeMCU at £7.78 is an excellent choice. However, if your projects require higher processing power, Bluetooth connectivity, and more extensive memory capabilities, the diymore ESP32-CAM-MB at £10.98 is worth the investment. Consider your project requirements carefully to select the board that best fits your development goals.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

AZDelivery NodeMCU WiFi Lolin V3 ESP8266 ESP-12F Internet Development Board Modu vs diymore 1pcs for ESP32-CAM-MB WiFi Bluetooth Development Board | versusfinder