Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste vs ARCTIC MX-6
Updated August 2026 — The Corsair XTM70 offers superior performance and convenience, while the ARCTIC MX-6 is a budget-friendly option with good versatility.
The Corsair XTM70 offers superior performance and convenience, while the ARCTIC MX-6 is a budget-friendly option with good versatility.
Why Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste is better
performance
Designed for high-performance processors up to 250W TDP.
cleaning convenience
Includes cleaning wipes for easy surface preparation.
application ease
Low viscosity formula with applicator kit for precise application.
Why ARCTIC MX-6 is better
price
More budget-friendly at £6.99.
versatility
Suitable for various applications including direct-die cooling.
safety features
Non-conductive and non-capacitive for safer application.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Corsair XTM70 Extreme Performance Thermal Paste | ARCTIC MX-6 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Corsair | ARCTIC |
| Current Price | £14.99 | £6.99 |
| TDP Support | Up to 250W | Not specified |
| Cleaning Wipes | Included | Not included |
| Conductivity | Not specified | Non-conductive |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Thermal Pastes
When it comes to thermal pastes, both the Corsair XTM70 and ARCTIC MX-6 present themselves as strong contenders in the cooling market. The Corsair XTM70 is priced at £14.99, while the ARCTIC MX-6 offers a more budget-friendly option at £6.99. Both products aim to enhance thermal transfer between processors and heatsinks, ensuring that high-performance CPUs, GPUs, and consoles maintain optimal operating temperatures.
Performance Comparison
In terms of performance, the Corsair XTM70 is designed for high-performance processors with a thermal design power (TDP) of up to 250W and higher, making it suitable for serious gaming rigs or intensive workstations. The ARCTIC MX-6, on the other hand, boasts a 20% improvement in thermal performance over its predecessor, the MX-4. This reduction in thermal resistance indicates that MX-6 can effectively handle various applications, including direct-die cooling scenarios, which is vital for modern graphics cards and gaming consoles.
Application Ease
When it comes to ease of application, the Corsair XTM70 features a low viscosity formula that allows for an even and clean spread, facilitated by an included applicator kit. This attention to application ensures peak thermal transfer performance. Conversely, the ARCTIC MX-6 is praised for its easy-to-use consistency, allowing it to be applied efficiently across a diverse range of setups. Both products are designed to simplify the application process, though the inclusion of specific applicators with the Corsair may provide an edge in precision.
Cleaning Convenience
The Corsair XTM70 includes three cleaning wipes for removing old paste, an essential feature for maintaining optimal thermal transfer between applications. This added convenience helps users to prepare their surfaces effectively before applying new thermal paste. The ARCTIC MX-6 does not mention any cleaning accessories, which may require users to source their own cleaning solutions. The inclusion of cleaning wipes with the Corsair XTM70 indicates a more comprehensive package for those concerned about surface preparation.
Safety Features
In terms of safety, the ARCTIC MX-6 is designed to be neither electrically conductive nor capacitive, significantly reducing the risk of short circuits or discharges during application. This feature makes it a safer choice for users who may be concerned about damaging sensitive components. The Corsair XTM70 does not explicitly mention its conductivity properties, which could leave some users seeking additional reassurance regarding its safety during application.
Versatility of Use
Both thermal pastes showcase versatility, but in different contexts. The Corsair XTM70 is ideal for high-performance applications, specifically tailored for CPUs and AIO cold plates. Meanwhile, the ARCTIC MX-6 is adaptable for a variety of scenarios, including direct-die cooling on GPUs and console processors. This versatility could make the ARCTIC MX-6 a more attractive option for users with mixed usage scenarios, while the Corsair XTM70 is clearly aimed at high-end performance.
Brand Reputation
Corsair and ARCTIC both have established reputations in the cooling market, with ARCTIC boasting over 20 years of experience in PC cooling. This legacy brings a certain level of assurance regarding the quality and effectiveness of their products. Corsair is also known for its premium components, and the XTM70 reflects this commitment to high performance and customer satisfaction. The choice between brands may ultimately depend on personal preference and past experiences with either manufacturer.
Which should you buy?
When it comes to choosing between the Corsair XTM70 and ARCTIC MX-6, the decision largely depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a high-performance thermal paste for demanding applications and appreciate added convenience with cleaning wipes and an applicator kit, the Corsair XTM70 at £14.99 may be worth the investment. However, if you are looking for a cost-effective solution that still offers impressive thermal performance and versatility for various applications, the ARCTIC MX-6 at £6.99 is a compelling choice. Ultimately, both products offer unique advantages, making them suitable for different user profiles in the realm of thermal management.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

