vsversusfinder

Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 Black p/n 570-AAMH vs HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse

Updated August 2026The HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse excels in design, battery life, and compatibility, making it the better choice despite a higher price.

The HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse excels in design, battery life, and compatibility, making it the better choice despite a higher price.

Why Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 Black p/n 570-AAMH is better

price

Dell is cheaper at £13.03

basic functionality

Dell offers essential features without frills

simple design

Dell has a straightforward design for practical use

Why HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse is better

battery life

HP lasts up to 16 months on a single battery

design

HP has a sleek and fashionable look

compatibility

HP supports multiple operating systems

Overall score

Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 Black p/n 570-AAMH
70
HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse
85

Specifications

SpecDell Wireless Mouse WM126 Black p/n 570-AAMHHP Z3700 Wireless Mouse
BrandDellHP
Current Price£13.03£14.61
Battery TypeAAAA
Wireless TypeStandard2.4GHz
Buttons33
Surface TechStandardBlue LED

Dimension comparison

Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 Black p/n 570-AAMHHP Z3700 Wireless Mouse

Design and Aesthetics

The Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 has a straightforward design, while the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse is crafted for style. The HP Z3700 stands out with its sleek and fashionable look, designed to complement your favourite HP devices. In contrast, the Dell mouse focuses on functionality without frills, providing a comfortable grip in either hand. Both mice are portable, fitting easily into bags for on-the-go work, but the HP Z3700’s design might appeal more to users looking for a stylish accessory.

Wireless Performance

Both the Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 and the HP Z3700 offer reliable wireless connections, but the HP Z3700 enhances this with its 2.4GHz technology. This ensures a robust link that is less prone to interference compared to standard wireless mice. The Dell mouse, while dependable, does not specify any advanced wireless technology. Users seeking a consistently strong connection may find the HP Z3700's offering more appealing, particularly in environments with multiple wireless devices.

Battery Life

Battery longevity is a notable feature of both mice, but the HP Z3700 takes the lead with an impressive battery life of up to 16 months on a single AA battery. The Dell Wireless Mouse WM126, while still commendable, provides up to 1 year of battery life. This significant difference means that users of the HP Z3700 can enjoy a longer period without the hassle of changing batteries, making it a more convenient choice for those who want to minimise maintenance.

Ease of Use

Both mice are designed for ease of use, featuring a plug-and-play setup that requires no additional software. The Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 includes three clickable buttons and a scroll wheel, which makes navigation straightforward. The HP Z3700, on the other hand, incorporates Blue LED technology, allowing it to work on a variety of surfaces, enhancing its versatility. Users who frequently switch locations may appreciate the HP's ability to function effectively on different surfaces.

Portability

When it comes to portability, the HP Z3700 offers a distinct advantage with its USB receiver that conveniently fits inside the mouse itself. This feature ensures that the receiver is always with the mouse, reducing the risk of losing it. The Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 is also portable, but it does not mention any specific storage solution for the USB receiver. If you are often on the move and prioritise convenience, the HP Z3700’s design makes it easier to carry.

Compatibility

In terms of compatibility, the HP Z3700 supports a wider range of operating systems, including Windows 7, 8, 10, 11, Mac OS 10.3 or later, and Chrome OS. This multi-OS support makes it a versatile choice for users with different devices. The Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 does not specify its compatibility beyond general use, which may limit its appeal for those who use multiple operating systems. For users who switch between different platforms, the HP Z3700 is the more adaptable option.

Pricing

The Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 is priced at £13.03, making it a budget-friendly choice for users seeking a reliable wireless mouse. Meanwhile, the HP Z3700 is slightly more expensive at £14.61. The price difference of £1.58 may be justified for those who value the additional features offered by the HP model, such as its superior battery life, stylish design, and compatibility with various operating systems. However, budget-conscious consumers might find the Dell model to be a more economical option without compromising much on essential functionality.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 and the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritise style, battery life, and multi-OS compatibility, the HP Z3700 is the better choice despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a solid, no-frills mouse at a lower price, the Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 still offers great functionality. Consider what features matter most to you to make the best decision for your computing needs.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Dell Wireless Mouse WM126 Black p/n 570-AAMH vs HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse | versusfinder