vsversusfinder

Intel 20 Core i7 14700F Raptor Lake Refresh CPU/Processor vs INTEL Core Ultra 5 225 3.3GHz Box CPU

Updated August 2026The Intel 20 Core i7 14700F offers superior performance for demanding tasks, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a budget-friendly option for everyday use.

The Intel 20 Core i7 14700F offers superior performance for demanding tasks, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a budget-friendly option for everyday use.

Why Intel 20 Core i7 14700F Raptor Lake Refresh CPU/Processor is better

core count

20 cores vs 10 cores

performance

Optimized for high-performance tasks

memory support

Supports both DDR5 and DDR4

Why INTEL Core Ultra 5 225 3.3GHz Box CPU is better

price

Lower cost at £190.85

integrated graphics

Includes Intel Graphics

power efficiency

Hybrid architecture for better energy management

Overall score

Intel 20 Core i7 14700F Raptor Lake Refresh CPU/Processor
85
INTEL Core Ultra 5 225 3.3GHz Box CPU
70

Specifications

SpecIntel 20 Core i7 14700F Raptor Lake Refresh CPU/ProcessorINTEL Core Ultra 5 225 3.3GHz Box CPU
Cores2010
Threads2014
Max GHz5.44.9
Integrated GPUNoYes
Base Power65WNo thermal solution

Dimension comparison

Intel 20 Core i7 14700F Raptor Lake Refresh CPU/ProcessorINTEL Core Ultra 5 225 3.3GHz Box CPU

Overview of the Intel 20 Core i7 14700F and Intel Core Ultra 5 225

The Intel 20 Core i7 14700F Raptor Lake Refresh CPU is priced at £298.99, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is more budget-friendly at £190.85. Both processors are designed for desktop use but cater to slightly different needs and budgets within the computing market.

The i7 14700F features 20 cores, optimised for gamers and productivity, while the Ultra 5 225 offers a hybrid architecture with 10 cores, including both performance and efficiency cores. This comparison will delve into their specifications, performance capabilities, compatibility, and pricing to help potential buyers make an informed decision.

Core Architecture and Performance

The i7 14700F boasts a robust 20 cores, making it a formidable option for multitasking and demanding applications. In contrast, the Ultra 5 225 features a hybrid architecture with 10 cores, comprising 6 performance (P) cores and 4 efficiency (E) cores, which allows it to excel in energy management while still providing significant performance capabilities.

While the i7 14700F is tailored for high-performance scenarios, the Ultra 5 225 can reach up to 4.9 GHz, optimising workloads effectively. The i7 14700F, however, leverages Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 to maximise its performance potential, making it particularly appealing for intensive gaming and productivity tasks.

Graphics and Integrated Solutions

One of the notable differences between the two processors is their approach to graphics. The i7 14700F does not include integrated graphics, necessitating a discrete graphics card for any visual output. This can lead to additional costs for buyers needing to invest in a separate GPU.

Conversely, the Ultra 5 225 includes integrated Intel Graphics, which can significantly reduce the overall build cost for users who do not require high-end graphical performance. This makes the Ultra 5 225 a more versatile choice for casual users or those building a system without a dedicated GPU, saving an additional investment.

Memory Support and Compatibility

The i7 14700F supports both DDR5 and DDR4 memory types, making it highly adaptable to different system configurations. This dual support is particularly beneficial for users looking to upgrade their memory without overhauling their entire system.

On the other hand, the Ultra 5 225 is compatible with Intel’s 800 series chipset-based motherboards, aligning it with the latest technology standards in terms of connectivity and performance. While it does not specify memory support types, its inclusion of PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 support ensures it can handle the latest peripherals and storage solutions effectively.

Power Consumption and Thermal Management

Power consumption is another critical factor where these processors differ. The i7 14700F operates with a base power of 65W, which is efficient for a high-core count processor. This efficiency can translate to lower cooling requirements, although a discrete cooling solution is still necessary due to its lack of integrated graphics.

In comparison, the Ultra 5 225 does not come with a thermal solution included, which could mean additional costs for buyers needing to purchase a cooling system separately. However, its architecture is designed to manage power effectively, potentially leading to lower overall system heat output compared to traditional designs.

Pricing and Value Proposition

At £298.99, the i7 14700F is positioned as a premium offering, justifying its price with high core counts and advanced technologies aimed at performance enthusiasts. This price point reflects its capabilities and the performance it delivers, appealing to gamers and professionals who require top-tier processing power.

Meanwhile, the Ultra 5 225 is priced at £190.85, making it a more accessible option for budget-conscious consumers seeking a competent CPU for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The inclusion of integrated graphics adds value, especially for those who may not need the high performance of a dedicated graphics card.

Use Cases and Target Audiences

The i7 14700F is particularly suited for gamers, content creators, and professionals working with demanding applications requiring substantial processing power. Its high core count and advanced features make it ideal for tasks that can leverage multiple threads effectively, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and high-end gaming.

Conversely, the Ultra 5 225 targets casual users, students, and those looking for a balanced performance for everyday computing tasks. Its integrated graphics and hybrid architecture make it a suitable choice for general use and light gaming, providing a good performance-to-price ratio for non-demanding applications.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Intel 20 Core i7 14700F and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require extreme performance for gaming or professional workloads and can invest in a separate GPU, the i7 14700F is the superior option with its high core count and advanced features.

However, if you’re looking for a cost-effective solution for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, the Ultra 5 225 offers excellent value with its integrated graphics and hybrid architecture at a significantly lower price. In summary, assess your performance requirements and budget constraints to determine the best fit for your computing needs.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Intel 20 Core i7 14700F Raptor Lake Refresh CPU/Processor vs INTEL Core Ultra 5 225 3.3GHz Box CPU | versusfinder