Logitech M330 SILENT PLUS Wireless Mouse vs TECKNET Wireless Mouse
Updated August 2026 — The Logitech M330 SILENT PLUS Wireless Mouse offers superior comfort and advanced features, making it the better choice for serious users, while the TECKNET Wireless Mouse is a budget-friendly option for casual use.
The Logitech M330 SILENT PLUS Wireless Mouse offers superior comfort and advanced features, making it the better choice for serious users, while the TECKNET Wireless Mouse is a budget-friendly option for casual use.
Why Logitech M330 SILENT PLUS Wireless Mouse is better
Battery Life
Logitech M330 has 18 months battery life compared to TECKNET's 12 months.
Noise Level
Logitech M330 features SilentTouch Technology for quieter operation.
Build Quality
Logitech M330 uses post-consumer recycled plastic, enhancing sustainability.
Why TECKNET Wireless Mouse is better
Price
TECKNET Wireless Mouse is significantly cheaper at £11.69.
Weight
TECKNET Wireless Mouse is lighter at 56g.
DPI Settings
TECKNET offers adjustable DPI settings for cursor sensitivity.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Logitech M330 SILENT PLUS Wireless Mouse | TECKNET Wireless Mouse |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Logitech | TECKNET |
| Design | Right-handed | Ambidextrous |
| Tracking | Advanced Optical | Standard Optical |
| Wireless Range | 10m | 10m |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Logitech M330 SILENT PLUS Wireless Mouse is priced at £25.99, while the TECKNET Wireless Mouse is significantly cheaper at £11.69. This represents a price difference of £14.30, making the TECKNET option a more budget-friendly choice. However, the price difference reflects not just the brand but also the features and performance inherent to each model. While the Logitech mouse offers advanced technology and comfort for a premium price, the TECKNET mouse provides basic functionality suitable for casual users.
Design and Comfort
When it comes to design, the Logitech M330 SILENT PLUS boasts a crafted, contoured shape specifically designed for right-handed users, ensuring long-lasting comfort during extended usage. In contrast, the TECKNET Wireless Mouse features an ambidextrous design, enabling comfortable use for both right and left-handed users. The Logitech model emphasises ergonomic support with soft rubber contours, ideal for those who spend hours at the computer. Meanwhile, the TECKNET mouse is compact and lightweight at just 56g, making it portable and easy to handle in various environments.
Performance and Functionality
The performance of the Logitech M330 is marked by its advanced optical tracking capabilities, allowing for precise cursor control across various surfaces. It has a wireless range of up to 10 metres, ensuring flexibility during use. The TECKNET Wireless Mouse also offers a 10-metre range; however, it includes three adjustable DPI settings (800/1200/1600) for tailored cursor sensitivity. This feature is beneficial for users seeking greater control over their pointer accuracy, while the Logitech mouse focuses on delivering a quieter clicking experience via its SilentTouch Technology, reducing clicking sounds by over 90%.
Battery Life
The Logitech M330 shines with an impressive battery life of 18 months on a single AA battery, supported by a power-saving auto-sleep mode. This longevity means users can concentrate on their work without the frequent interruption of battery changes. Conversely, the TECKNET Wireless Mouse offers a respectable 12-month battery life, also utilising an intelligent sleep mode to conserve power. While both options excel in battery efficiency, Logitech's offering provides a longer-lasting solution, making it a more reliable option for heavy users.
Connectivity
Both mice utilise plug-and-play technology, facilitating easy setup with their included USB receivers. The Logitech M330 is compatible with a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, macOS, ChromeOS, and Linux, ensuring versatility across different devices. Similarly, the TECKNET Wireless Mouse supports various platforms, making it adaptable for users with different systems. However, the Logitech's compatibility is reinforced by its extensive warranty, adding an extra layer of consumer confidence.
Noise Level
A defining feature of the Logitech M330 is its Quieter Click technology, which significantly reduces clicking noise, making it an excellent choice for quiet environments such as offices or libraries. In contrast, while the TECKNET Wireless Mouse also promotes silent operation with its minimised clicking noise, it does not specify a percentage reduction in noise levels like its Logitech counterpart. For users prioritising a quieter workspace, the Logitech M330 clearly stands out as the superior option.
Overall Build Quality
The Logitech M330 emphasizes quality with its use of post-consumer recycled plastic, boasting 76% recyclability in some colours. This commitment to sustainability enhances its appeal for environmentally conscious consumers. The TECKNET Wireless Mouse, while well-built for its price point, does not highlight similar eco-friendly credentials. Logitech’s focus on both durability and sustainability positions it as a premium choice for those who value long-lasting products and environmental responsibility.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Logitech M330 SILENT PLUS Wireless Mouse and the TECKNET Wireless Mouse hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a mouse that offers superior comfort, advanced tracking, and a quieter operation for a premium price of £25.99, the Logitech M330 is the clear winner. However, if you need a basic, cost-effective solution for casual use, the TECKNET Wireless Mouse at £11.69 provides excellent value. Your decision should reflect how much you value features like battery life, ergonomic design, and noise reduction in your daily computing experience.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

