vsversusfinder

Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows vs Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver for Wireless Keyboard or Mouse

Updated August 2026The Logitech MK120 offers a comprehensive and user-friendly experience, while the Arteck receiver is a budget option with limited functionality. Overall, the Logitech MK120 is the better choice.

The Logitech MK120 offers a comprehensive and user-friendly experience, while the Arteck receiver is a budget option with limited functionality. Overall, the Logitech MK120 is the better choice.

Why Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows is better

complete solution

Logitech MK120 includes both keyboard and mouse

build quality

Logitech MK120 features durable keys and spill resistance

user experience

Logitech MK120 offers plug-and-play setup

Why Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver for Wireless Keyboard or Mouse is better

price

Arteck receiver is significantly cheaper

portability

Arteck receiver is compact and easy to carry

specific use

Arteck receiver is suitable for existing Arteck devices

Overall score

Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows
85
Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver for Wireless Keyboard or Mouse
55

Specifications

SpecLogitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo for WindowsArteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver for Wireless Keyboard or Mouse
BrandLogitechArteck
TypeWired ComboUSB Receiver
ConnectionUSBUSB
Weight1.2 kg0.1 kg
Dimensions45 x 15 x 3 cm3 x 1 x 1 cm

Dimension comparison

Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo for WindowsArteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver for Wireless Keyboard or Mouse

Overview of the Logitech MK120 and Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver

The Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows is a durable and reliable choice at £17.00, while the Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver for Wireless Keyboard or Mouse is a budget-friendly option priced at £5.99. Both products cater to different user needs, with the Logitech combo providing an all-in-one solution and the Arteck receiver serving as an accessory that requires manual pairing.

The Logitech MK120 offers a spill-resistant design and an ergonomic layout that enhances typing comfort. In contrast, the Arteck receiver is intended for use with compatible Arteck wireless products, necessitating an additional setup process for pairing. These fundamental differences highlight the distinct target audiences for each product.

Design and Build Quality

The Logitech MK120 boasts a robust build quality, featuring a spill-resistant design and durable keys that can withstand up to 10 million keystrokes. This construction is particularly advantageous for users who require a reliable keyboard and mouse setup for prolonged use. The full-size layout, including a number pad and standard F-keys, enhances its usability for both casual and professional environments.

On the other hand, the Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver is designed with portability in mind, being a compact accessory rather than a complete keyboard and mouse system. While it does not have its own build quality attributes, it is specifically engineered to work seamlessly with Arteck wireless devices. However, it lacks the extensive features and durability found in the Logitech MK120.

User Experience

When it comes to user experience, the Logitech MK120 excels with its comfortable, familiar typing feel provided by deep-profile keys. The adjustable tilt legs allow for enhanced ergonomics, making it suitable for long hours of work. The optical USB mouse included in the combo ensures smooth and accurate tracking, accommodating various user preferences.

In contrast, the Arteck receiver necessitates a manual pairing process with Arteck devices, which might be a deterrent for some users. The pairing instructions can be complex for those unfamiliar with the process, potentially leading to frustration. This difference in user experience is significant, as the Logitech MK120 offers a plug-and-play setup that requires minimal effort.

Compatibility

The Logitech MK120 is compatible with Windows 7, 8, 10, and later versions, making it a versatile option for a wide range of PC users. Its USB connection ensures easy compatibility with most desktop and laptop systems. This broad compatibility is a key selling point, particularly for users who may switch between devices.

Conversely, the Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver is specifically designed for Arteck wireless products and is not compatible with devices from other brands. This limitation means that users must already own or plan to purchase Arteck devices for the receiver to be useful. The exclusivity of compatibility may restrict the Arteck receiver's appeal compared to the Logitech MK120.

Price Point

At £17.00, the Logitech MK120 represents a more substantial investment compared to the Arteck receiver, which is priced at £5.99. However, the price difference is justified by the all-in-one nature of the Logitech combo, which offers both a keyboard and a mouse. For individuals seeking a comprehensive solution, the higher price of the Logitech MK120 may be more appealing.

The Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver, while more affordable, serves a specific purpose and lacks the functionality of a full keyboard and mouse setup. Its lower price point may be attractive for budget-conscious buyers or those who already possess Arteck peripherals and need a replacement receiver.

Features and Functionality

The Logitech MK120 comes equipped with features that enhance its functionality, including spill resistance, a full-size layout, and durable keys. The high-definition optical mouse included in the combo provides reliable tracking and comfort for extended use, making it a well-rounded option for various tasks.

In contrast, the Arteck receiver's functionality is limited to establishing a wireless connection with compatible Arteck keyboards or mice. The requirement for manual pairing complicates its use and may deter those looking for a straightforward, hassle-free experience. This disparity in features significantly impacts the overall usability of each product.

Sustainability

Logitech has incorporated sustainability into the MK120, with 72% of the plastic in the mouse and 54% in the keyboard being certified post-consumer recycled plastic. This commitment to reducing the carbon footprint, which is noted at 5.03 kg CO2e, makes the Logitech MK120 a more environmentally friendly choice.

The Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver does not specify any sustainable practices or materials used in its design, which may be a consideration for environmentally conscious consumers. As sustainability becomes increasingly important, the Logitech MK120's eco-friendly approach could sway buyers towards its purchase.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo and the Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver ultimately depends on your needs. If you require a complete and durable solution with comfort and ease of use, the Logitech MK120 is worth the investment at £17.00. It offers features, compatibility, and sustainability that cater to a wide range of users.

On the other hand, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option and already own Arteck devices, the Arteck receiver priced at £5.99 may suffice. However, its manual pairing process and limited compatibility might not appeal to everyone. Therefore, for most users seeking a reliable and user-friendly experience, the Logitech MK120 stands out as the superior choice.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows vs Arteck 2.4G Nano USB Receiver for Wireless Keyboard or Mouse | versusfinder