Philips HomeRun 7000 Series Robot Vacuum and Mop vs Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop with Self-charging Base - Deep-cle
Updated August 2026 — The Philips HomeRun 7000 Series offers great value with solid performance, while the Shark Matrix Plus excels in advanced technology and cleaning capabilities. Choose based on your budget and cleaning needs.
The Philips HomeRun 7000 Series offers great value with solid performance, while the Shark Matrix Plus excels in advanced technology and cleaning capabilities. Choose based on your budget and cleaning needs.
Why Philips HomeRun 7000 Series Robot Vacuum and Mop is better
price
Philips is significantly cheaper at £201.10
auto-empty
Philips has a 30-day auto-empty feature
quiet operation
Philips operates quietly during cleaning
Why Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop with Self-charging Base - Deep-cle is better
cleaning technology
Shark uses sonic mopping for deep cleaning
mapping capability
Shark features 3D 360° LiDAR vision mapping
self-cleaning
Shark has a self-cleaning brush roll for pet hair
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Philips HomeRun 7000 Series Robot Vacuum and Mop | Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop with Self-charging Base - Deep-cle |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Philips | Shark |
| Price | £201.10 | £499.99 |
| Mopping | Yes | Yes |
| App Control | Yes | Yes |
| Obstacle Detection | 3D ToF | 3D LiDAR |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to Robotic Cleaning
When it comes to robotic vacuums, the Philips HomeRun 7000 Series Robot Vacuum and Mop and the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop are two standout options. Each model offers unique features catered to different cleaning needs, with the Philips priced at £201.10 and the Shark at £499.99. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each can help you make a more informed decision about which one suits your home best.
Cleaning Performance
The cleaning performance of both robotic vacuums is impressive but tailored to different users. The Philips HomeRun features a powerful 5000 PA suction capability, adept at removing pet hair, crumbs, and deep-seated dirt from various surfaces. In contrast, the Shark Matrix boasts sonic mopping technology that deep cleans in a precise grid pattern, ensuring thorough dirt removal with multiple passes. This makes the Shark particularly suitable for homes with a variety of floor types, as it excels in corners and edges, thus offering a more versatile cleaning experience.
Smart Technology
Smart technology is a key feature in both products, but they differ in sophistication. The Philips HomeRun is equipped with advanced 3D ToF sensors for obstacle detection, allowing it to navigate around small objects effectively, even in low light. It also supports app-controlled cleaning flexibility, enabling users to customise cleaning modes and sequences. Conversely, the Shark Matrix employs 3D 360° LiDAR vision mapping, which not only maps your home but allows for customisable no-go zones via an app. This tech advantage makes the Shark more suitable for larger homes or those with complex layouts.
Maintenance and Convenience
Maintenance is a critical factor in robotic vacuum performance. The Philips HomeRun features a 3L auto-empty station that holds dust and hair for up to 30 days, enhancing user convenience significantly. This means less frequent emptying is required. On the other hand, the Shark Matrix offers a self-cleaning brush roll, which is particularly beneficial for pet owners as it removes hair from the brush while cleaning. Additionally, it has a 60-day-capacity dustbin, showcasing a commitment to convenience but requiring more maintenance than the Philips.
Noise Levels
While specific decibel ratings are not provided, the cleaning systems of both vacuums imply different noise experiences. The Philips HomeRun is designed to operate quietly, allowing for cleaning without disrupting daily life. In contrast, the Shark Matrix, with its sonic mopping and advanced cleaning capabilities, may produce more noise during operation due to its multiple passes and air blasts for cleaning edges. If noise is a concern in your household, the Philips might be the preferable choice.
Design and Build Quality
Both models exhibit thoughtful design, but they cater to different stylistic preferences. The Philips HomeRun features an elegant and modern appearance that seamlessly fits into contemporary homes. Its design is not only aesthetically pleasing but also functional, with a focus on efficient cleaning. The Shark Matrix, however, prioritises practicality with a robust build that includes a self-charging base. This makes it an excellent choice for households prioritising durability alongside style.
Price Point Analysis
Price is a significant factor when choosing between these two robotic vacuums. The Philips HomeRun is priced at £201.10, making it a budget-friendly option that still offers robust cleaning features. In contrast, the Shark Matrix is priced at £499.99, reflecting its advanced technology and additional features. For those on a tighter budget or without extensive cleaning needs, the Philips represents excellent value for money. However, if you are seeking cutting-edge technology and advanced cleaning capabilities, the investment in the Shark may be justified.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Philips HomeRun 7000 Series Robot Vacuum and Mop and the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you prefer a more affordable option that provides solid cleaning performance and convenience, the Philips HomeRun is the way to go. However, if your home requires advanced technology for comprehensive cleaning and you are willing to invest more, the Shark Matrix is likely the better choice. Each vacuum excels in its own right, ensuring that there's a suitable option for varying household requirements.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

