ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse vs HP Z3700 Dual Black Wireless Mouse
Updated August 2026 — The ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse excels in ergonomic design and multi-device connectivity, while the HP Z3700 offers superior battery life and sustainability. Choose based on your primary needs.
The ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse excels in ergonomic design and multi-device connectivity, while the HP Z3700 offers superior battery life and sustainability. Choose based on your primary needs.
Why ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse is better
Ergonomic Design
ProtoArc focuses on comfort for prolonged use.
Multi-Device Support
ProtoArc connects to three devices simultaneously.
Adjustable DPI
ProtoArc offers customizable sensitivity settings.
Why HP Z3700 Dual Black Wireless Mouse is better
Battery Life
HP Z3700 lasts up to 16 months on one AA battery.
Sustainability
HP Z3700 is made from 50% recycled materials.
Portability
HP Z3700 has a slim, pocket-sized design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse | HP Z3700 Dual Black Wireless Mouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £18.69 | £19.49 |
| Brand | ProtoArc | HP |
| DPI | 1000/1600/2400 | 1600 |
| Battery Type | Rechargeable | AA |
| Multi-OS Support | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Design and Comfort
When it comes to design and comfort, the ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse stands out with its ergonomic shape tailored for extended use. Its design features an extended wrist rest that supports a natural hand position, which can help reduce strain during long work hours. Conversely, the HP Z3700 Dual Black Wireless Mouse offers a sleek and portable design that prioritises convenience, making it ideal for on-the-go use. While both mice are designed for comfort, the ProtoArc's ergonomic focus may appeal more to users who spend prolonged periods at their desks, whereas the HP mouse suits those who require mobility and versatility.
Connectivity Options
The ProtoArc EM11 NL provides flexible connectivity options with its ability to connect up to three devices via Bluetooth 5.0 and 2.4G USB dual modes. This feature allows users to switch effortlessly between devices, enhancing productivity. In contrast, the HP Z3700 also supports dual-mode wireless connectivity, allowing for easy switching between a USB-A dongle and Bluetooth 5.0. While both mice offer dual connectivity, the ProtoArc's capability to connect to three devices at once gives it an edge for multi-device users.
Battery Life
Battery performance is a crucial consideration for wireless mice, and here, the HP Z3700 excels with its impressive one AA battery lasting up to 16 months. This extended battery life means less frequent replacements, providing a hassle-free experience for users. On the other hand, the ProtoArc EM11 NL features a rechargeable battery with a capacity of 500mAh. Although it offers the convenience of recharging, users may find themselves needing to recharge more frequently compared to the HP’s long-lasting battery.
DPI Settings and Sensitivity
For users who require precision, the ProtoArc EM11 NL features adjustable DPI settings at 1000, 1600, and 2400, allowing for enhanced tracking and responsiveness. This feature is particularly beneficial for tasks that demand high accuracy, such as graphic design or gaming. Meanwhile, the HP Z3700 has a fixed DPI of 1600, which provides smooth tracking but lacks the versatility of adjustable settings. Therefore, users prioritising customisation in sensitivity may prefer the ProtoArc, while those satisfied with standard precision may find the HP adequate.
Usability and Features
Both mice offer unique usability features that cater to different needs. The ProtoArc EM11 NL includes practical forward and backward buttons for web browsing, enhancing productivity during internet use. However, it’s important to note that these buttons are not compatible with Mac OS systems. The HP Z3700 also boasts features like quieter clicks and a multi-surface sensor, making it versatile across various environments. While both mice enhance user experience, the choice may depend on the specific operating system and the types of tasks users engage in.
Material and Sustainability
Sustainability is an important factor for many consumers today. The HP Z3700 stands out with its construction from 50% post-consumer recycled plastic, which may appeal to environmentally conscious users. Additionally, it comes in 100% recyclable packaging, aligning with eco-friendly values. The ProtoArc EM11 NL does not mention any sustainability features, which may be a drawback for users prioritising green materials. Thus, for those looking to make a more sustainable choice, the HP Z3700 presents a compelling option.
Price Consideration
In terms of pricing, the ProtoArc EM11 NL is currently available for £18.69, making it a budget-friendly ergonomic option. The HP Z3700, however, is priced slightly higher at £19.49. When considering the features offered, such as connectivity options and battery life, users may find the price difference justifiable depending on their specific needs. The ProtoArc may appeal more to those seeking ergonomic comfort at a lower price, while the HP offers a blend of portability and longevity at a slightly higher cost.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse and the HP Z3700 Dual Black Wireless Mouse ultimately hinges on individual preferences and use cases. If ergonomic design and multi-device connectivity are your top priorities, the ProtoArc is the better choice. Conversely, if you value portability, sustainability, and an impressive battery life, the HP Z3700 may be the ideal fit. Each mouse has its strengths, so consider your primary use to make the best decision.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

