vsversusfinder

ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse vs HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse

Updated August 2026The ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse excels in ergonomic design and connectivity, while the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse offers superior portability and battery life. Choose based on your specific needs.

The ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse excels in ergonomic design and connectivity, while the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse offers superior portability and battery life. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse is better

Ergonomics

ProtoArc prioritizes comfort with an extended wrist rest.

Connectivity

ProtoArc connects to three devices simultaneously.

DPI Settings

ProtoArc offers adjustable DPI for precise tracking.

Why HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse is better

Price

HP is more affordable at £14.61.

Battery Life

HP lasts up to 16 months on a single AA battery.

Portability

HP has a USB receiver that fits inside the mouse.

Overall score

ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse
85
HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse
75

Specifications

SpecProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic MouseHP Z3700 Wireless Mouse
BrandProtoArcHP
ConnectionBluetooth & USB2.4GHz
RechargeableYesNo
Multi-DeviceYesNo
Design FocusErgonomicStylish

Dimension comparison

ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic MouseHP Z3700 Wireless Mouse

Price Comparison

When considering price, the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse is the more economical choice at £14.61, while the ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse is priced at £18.69. This represents a difference of £4.08, making the HP option more appealing for budget-conscious consumers. Despite the price difference, both mice offer unique features that may justify their respective costs depending on user needs. If affordability is your primary concern, the HP Z3700 provides substantial value without compromising on essential functionality.

Design and Ergonomics

In terms of design, the ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse prioritises ergonomic comfort with its extended wrist rest, promoting a more natural hand position. This feature aims to reduce the risk of strain during prolonged use, particularly for individuals working long hours at a computer. Conversely, the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse showcases a sleek, portable design that emphasizes style and convenience. Although it lacks the ergonomic focus of the ProtoArc, it fits comfortably in various settings, appealing to users who value aesthetics alongside functionality.

Connectivity Options

Connectivity is a significant aspect where the ProtoArc EM11 NL stands out, featuring dual connection modes with Bluetooth 5.0 and a 2.4G USB receiver. This allows users to connect up to three devices simultaneously, making it a versatile choice for those who switch between devices often. In contrast, the HP Z3700 offers a reliable 2.4GHz wireless connection but does not support multiple simultaneous connections. This could be a limiting factor for users with multiple devices, making the ProtoArc a better option for multitaskers.

Battery Life

Battery life is another important consideration. The HP Z3700 boasts an impressive battery life of up to 16 months with a single AA battery, making it highly convenient for those who prefer minimal maintenance. On the other hand, the ProtoArc EM11 NL features a rechargeable 500mAh Li-ion battery, which can be charged via a Type-C cable. While the ProtoArc requires periodic charging, it does come with a low battery indicator to alert users when it’s time to recharge. For users prioritising long-lasting battery life without the need to recharge frequently, the HP Z3700 is a strong contender.

User Experience and Features

User experience varies significantly between the two mice. The ProtoArc EM11 NL is designed with usability in mind, offering adjustable DPI settings of 1000, 1600, and 2400 for precise tracking, along with convenient forward and backward buttons for web browsing. However, it is worth noting that the forward and back buttons are not compatible with Mac OS systems. In comparison, the HP Z3700 focuses on straightforward functionality with its plug-and-play setup, allowing users to get started immediately without installation. This simplicity can be appealing to those who prefer a hassle-free experience.

Portability

Portability is an essential factor for many users, especially those who work on the go. The HP Z3700 excels in this area, as its USB receiver conveniently fits inside the mouse for easy transport. This feature makes it an excellent choice for frequent travellers or those who need a mouse for different locations. The ProtoArc EM11 NL, while not lacking in portability, does not have the same integrated storage for its USB receiver, which could be a slight inconvenience for users who often move between workspaces.

Compatibility

Compatibility is crucial when choosing a mouse, and both options cater to a wide range of operating systems. The ProtoArc EM11 NL is compatible with Windows 8, 10, Mac OS X 10.12 or higher, and Android 4.3 or higher. The HP Z3700 offers similar support, functioning with Windows 7, 8, 10, 11, Mac OS 10.3 or later, and Chrome OS. This broad compatibility ensures that both mice can be used across various devices, making them versatile options for different user preferences and setups.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse and the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse ultimately depends on your specific needs and usage patterns. If you prioritise ergonomic design and the ability to connect multiple devices, the ProtoArc EM11 NL is likely the better fit, despite its higher price. However, if you seek a stylish, portable mouse with excellent battery life and a straightforward setup, the HP Z3700 presents a compelling option at a lower cost.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

ProtoArc EM11 NL Ergonomic Mouse vs HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse | versusfinder